My lengthy thread on test, trace and isolate in light of Sir Patrick Vallance’s comments and the Public Accounts Committee Report committees.parliament.uk/committee/127/… (1)
Yesterday, when asked about his assessment of TTI by Greg Clark, Sir Patrick Vallance said ” Test and trace is working very well at the moment” (March 9 Science Select Committee, 11.32am) (2) parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/36…
Sir Patrick agreed that “The isolate bit is very important (at all levels of cases)..TTI is more important as case numbers fall”. He also identified the importance of backward contact tracing i.e finding which contacts caused the case infection in order to identify clusters.(3)
Is TTI WORKING? Greg Clark MP chair of the Select Committee then asked: 'Unlocking depends upon the vaccine and reducing transmission, but how important is TTI to rate of unlocking? (4)
"The Test, trace isolate programme (Baroness Harding evidence to committee) assesses the impact of TTI on R value is up to 0.8. Have you assessed their assessment? Sir Patrick: No. "I dont know which of the modelling groups may have been linked in with JBC assessment.” (5)
PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE VIEW? Did they share Sir Patricks sanguine view of test, trace and isolate? No. Their report states "The Department of Health & Social Care (DHSC) justified the scale of investment, in part, on the basis that an effective test and trace system...(6)
"...would help avoid a second national lockdown - but since its creation we have had two more lockdowns...The “unimaginable” cost of Test & Trace has failed to deliver the central promise of averting a second - and third - lockdown. (7)
The Chair of PAC said “British taxpayers cannot be treated by Government like an ATM machine...(The TTI programme) must now “wean itself off its persistent reliance on consultants” (8)
"In early Feb 2021 NHST&T said it was still employing around 2,500 consultants, at an estimated average daily rate of around £1,100, with the highest daily rate paid of £6,624. It is concerning that the DHSC is still paying such amounts... (9)
– which it considers “very competitive rates - to so many consultants." (From Boston Consulting Group, Deloittes, PWC and others) (10)
TESTING "The percentage of total laboratory testing capacity used in Nov/Dec 2020 remained under 65%, and even with the spare capacity, NHST&T has never met the target to turn around all tests in face-to-face settings in 24 hours." (11)
TRACING "NHST&T had also contacted over 2.5 million people testing positive for COVID-19 in England and advised more than 4.5 million of their associated contacts to self-isolate.” That's a ratio of 2 contacts to 1 case, most of them in the same household. (12)
A Nature review nature.com/articles/d4158… reported "The number of contacts identified for each COVID-19 case varies wildly, from an average of 17 per case in Taiwan, to 2 in the United Kingdom” Boots on the ground+ local second and third order testing was secret of success (13)..
.. in countries like Vietnam, Taiwan, together with use of local apps to monitor compliance with isolation. "Wealthy nations struggled to hire enough contact-tracers, marshal them efficiently or make sure that people do self-isolate when infected or that they quarantine.” (14)
Another China study showed "The spread of COVID-19 was effectively controlled in Wanzhou by breaking the transmission chain through social distancing, extensive contact tracing, mass testing and strict quarantine of close contacts.” nature.com/articles/s4159… (15)
An recent pre-print review which modelled data in China concluded : stringent lockdown with broad (self- and contact tracing) quarantine interventions reduced the pool of susceptible individuals, effective contact rate and secondary transmissions. medrxiv.org/content/10.110… (16)
"For example, if the estimated time for 50% of initial susceptible population of China to be self-quarantined (∼2 weeks from Jan. 21) had been delayed by just one week, then the total number of cases would be approximately 10 times larger” (17)
MASS TESTING PAC Report "In reality full compliance with self-isolation rules can be low. NHST&T plans to increase the proportion of cases identified through the mass testing of people without symptoms. (18)
"However, the interim report on the Liverpool mass testing pilot did not find clear evidence that the pilot reduced positive COVID-19 cases or hospital admissions." (19)
EFFECTIVENESS of TTI? "NHST&T publishes a lot of performance data but these do not demonstrate how effective test and trace is at reducing transmission of COVID-19. For NHST&T to be effective in breaking chains of COVID-19 transmission, it must identify.. " (20)
"..as many people as possible who are infected with or exposed to the virus, as quickly as possible, within 48-72 hours of the original case developing symptoms, i.e. from ‘cough to contact’." (21)
ISOLATION? "effectiveness relies on people self-isolating .. “independent verified analysis” suggested that its activities in October 2020 contributed to a reduction in the “R number” provided that people with the virus start self-isolating once they develop symptoms..(22)
"... i.e. before even engaging with the test and trace system. They assume that people self-isolate as required..in particular between developing symptoms and receiving their test results. In reality full compliance with self-isolation rules can be low.” (23)
"NHST&T weekly performance data.. do not provide an overview of the speed of the process from beginning to end (“cough to contact”) and thus do not allow readers to understand the overall effectiveness of the programme." (24)
SUMMARY. In contrast to Sir Patricks view, PAC believes testing is not rapid enough, nor sustainable, tracing is not local + numbers way too low, claimed effectiveness is simply wrong + self-isolation way too low. Financial support for poor people is not effective.
After a year, we have not produced an isolation system that works. And we have committed eye-watering sums (£37,000 billion) to a failed system. Surely senior people should now consider their positions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Sorry George. Only just seen this. Thanks for the references to hypothesis papers. I don't disagree with Lavine et al’s model when she suggests "SARS-CoV-2 could join the ranks of mild, cold-causing endemic HCoVs in the long run”. Depends upon what is meant by the long run. (1)
Nor that vaccines could slow or accelerate this process depending upon the type of immunity they induce. I certainly agree with her that "These results reinforce the importance of behavioral containment during pandemic vaccine rollout”. (2)
I also agree with Veldhoen and Simas that the "question is whether the vaccines will be effective against reinfection or even eradicate SARS-CoV-2. Here, we suggest both answers are most probably no”. (3)
There is a lot of nonsense about Zero Covid being an extreme position, only possible in repressive states (er..S Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Norway, Finland, NZ??) and our UK strategy reflects a more sensible centrist view. So compare the UK with successful countries...(1)
In fact we had a clear statement for proper public health control of the epidemic from WHO on Jan 29 2020, and the China Report from WHO on Feb 24 2020. All measures were not controversial and not based on rocket science or modelling. (2)
A new paper from Anhui province (pop 64 million, almost same as UK) in China shows how control was achieved without any severe or prolonged lockdown. sciencedirect.com/science/articl… (3)
Today we lost 1820 of our citizens. Many of these deaths could have been prevented. I plead with our Secretary of State @MattHancock and @CMO_England to make changes to our community protective shield as follows: (1)
Face the data with humility. Latest data show only 32% of in-person test results were received within 24 hours...Way too slow. For all routes combined, 18.3% of tests from all test sites were received within 24 hours of a test. (2)
Since Test and Trace launched, 97.8% of all contacts managed by local health protection teams have been successfully reached. Performance of call centres is much worse. The % reached within 24h of the case that reported them reaching the contact tracing system fell to 67.7%. (3)
SAGE Minutes Dec 22: "It is highly unlikely that measures with stringency + adherence in line with the measures in England in November (i.e. with schools open) wd be sufficient to maintain R below 1 in the presence of the new variant. R would be lower with schools closed"
SAGE Minutes Dec 22 "It is not known whether measures with similar stringency and adherence as Spring, with both primary and secondary schools closed, would be sufficient to bring R below 1 in the presence of the new variant." google.com/search?client=…
SAGE Minutes Dec 22 "ACTION: PHE to share information on new variant and South Africa variant with policymakers and ministers for consideration of action".
The PM says all frontline workers, people aged 70+ and people with serious underlying conditions will be vaccinated by mid-February. That’s 13 million, so 2 million per week. Potentially doable if GPs are supported with staff, volunteers funding and supplies. (1)
We must see a generous allowance funded by Treasury for isolation when infected or a contact. Without it, transmission will remain high increasing the risk of vaccine resistance. If not, could be the costliest mistake of the whole pandemic. (2)
Border screening must be made much tighter. Especially to identify new aggressive strains from other countries. (3)
Modellers believe that spreading out our limited supply of vaccine as single doses for 3 months will save up to 6000 lives. One concern though is whether single doses might lead to 'vaccine resistance' through virus mutation. (1)
If we assume that over the next 12 weeks 12-20 million people get one dose of a vaccine and are told or believe it gives 90% protection what % will actually go for a second jab? We might assume second dose coverage is at best 70%. (2)
That means between 4 and 6.7 million people might have fading protection. Will the risk of creating a vaccine resistant mutant in this group of people, which could spread rapidly to 7 billion people around the world, outweigh the benefits of 6000 deaths prevented. (3)