“News feeds on @Facebook or @Twitter operate on a business model of commodifying the attention of billions of people per day. They have led to narrower and crazier views of the world.”
"the internet has taken us back to the (American) 1890s: Once again, we have a small class of enormously wealthy and economically powerful people whose obligations are to themselves, and perhaps to their shareholders, but not to the greater good."
We "cannot ignore the existence of “organized structures aimed at sowing mistrust, undermining democratic stability.” Action must be taken against “inauthentic use” and “automated exploitation” if they harm “civic discourse,” according to the EU’s Digital Services Act".
"The Nazis introduced the Volksempfänger, a cheap wireless transistor set, to broadcast Hitler’s speeches... In America, radio was taken over not by the state but by private media companies chasing ratings—and one of the best ways to get ratings was to promote hatred."
'In Britain, radio was controlled neither by state, as it was in dictatorships, nor by polarizing, profit-seeking companies. Public radio, funded by taxpayers but independent of the govt, would “inform, educate & entertain” AND facilitate democracy by bringing society together'.
'Instead of making people angry, participation in online forums should give the same civic thrill that town halls or social clubs once did. We need to relearn how to run an organization, how to handle disagreement, how to be civilized people who don’t storm out of an argument.'
Polis is a platform that lets people make tweet-like statements & lets others vote on them. There's no “reply” function. The system identifies those that generate the most agreement among different groups. Instead of favoring outrageous views, its algorithm highlights consensus.
A “self-sovereign identity” system would allow individuals to accrue a connective tissue of trusted sources that proves you are real. You could still be anonymous, but it would assure everyone else that you are an actual human, making it possible for platforms to screen out bots.
Twitter 'super-users' rate the platform highly for making them “feel connected,” but give it low marks for “encouraging the humanization of others,” ensuring safety, & producing reliable information. People are eager to embrace reliable, humanizing & less polarizing alternatives.
Nobody wants to live in a city where everything is owned by a few giant corporations, with nothing but malls & billboards—yet that is essentially what the internet is. Democratic cities need parks & libraries & street markets, schools & police stations, sidewalks & art galleries.
'Our future online cities should inhabited by real people sharing ideas & opinions free of digital manipulation or distortion. In this city, government would cede power to citizens who use digital tools to get involved in budgets & building projects, schools & the environment.'
'It would mean being in charge of your own data eg you could give medics all the info they need to help fight diseases but data couldn’t be repurposed. You'd know not only who was behind advertising, political or otherwise, but how your data were used to target you specifically.'
By 1789, its authors knew exactly how bad confederation had been, and they understood what needed to be fixed. Our new internet would also embrace all of the lessons we have so bitterly learned, not only in the past 20 years but over the last few centuries.
We are back into an environment resembling the worst excesses of the past, compete with financial bubbles, exploitative commercialization, vicious polarization, attacks from dictatorships, lying politicians, & organised crime & corruption.
'But these are problems democracies have solved before. The solutions are in our history, in our DNA, in our own memories of how we have fixed broken systems in other eras. The internet was the future once, and it can be again, if we apply the best of the past to the present.'
This THREAD is edited text from this article by ANNE APPLEBAUM, a staff writer at @TheAtlantic , a fellow at the SNF Agora Institute at Johns Hopkins University, and the author of 'Twilight of Democracy: The Seductive Lure of Authoritarianism'.
Labour voters tend to feel more strongly about fairness, public services, & the need for collective action to tackle Britain’s problems.
They tend to be more liberal on gender & race equality & gay rights, are less hostile to Europe & to immigrants, & want a more equal society.
Tory voters tend to feel more strongly about the private sector, entrepreneurialism, crime & punishment, and taking individual rather than collective responsibility.
They tend to be less liberal on gender & race equality & gay rights & are more hostile to Europe & to immigrants.
In 2011, asked to pick the proudest year in Britain’s history, most @UKLabour voters’ chose 1948, the year the #NHS was founded; among @Conservatives it was 1940, the year when Britain stood alone against Hitler.
Voting intention is now much more to do with values than class.
THREAD on Cory Wimberly's book, 'How #Propaganda Became Public Relations'.
Imho, his book contains new & useful insights into why progressives have failed to progress democracy in meaningful ways, & reconceptualizes 'corporate propaganda' to help us forge new approaches.
To start, a few quotes from two of the 'founding fathers' of public relations:
“The significant revolution of modern times is not industrial or economic or political, but the revolution which is taking place in the art of creating consent among the governed".
- Walter Lippmann
“The basic elements of human nature are fixed as to desires and instincts and innate tendencies. The directions, however, in which these basic elements may be turned by skillful handling are infinite.”
"So Tim, what was it about British Asian satirist Nish Kumar that made you cancel his show?"
Welcome to all the trolls taking time out of their busy day to reply. I have no problem with you not finding Nish funny, as sense of humour is entirely subjective.
"What is it about British Asian satirist Nish Kumar that inspired you to share with us how much you dislike him?"
FAO dimwits: I'm parodying Mrs Merton's interview with Paul Daniels' wife Debee McGee “So what first attracted you to the millionaire Paul Daniels?” It was funny NOT because McGee is or isn't a 'gold-digger' (she may or may not be) but because of the construction of the question.
The "war on woke" is just a re-run of the "war on PC" from the 80s/90s, when people realised society would be improved if we reduced or stopped the use of grotesquely offensive terms to describe women & minorities - & Britain IS infinitely better off without those words.
The term “Political Correctness” is an “exonym”: a term for another group, which signals that the speaker does not belong to it, & it's helped the Right to drive a wedge between working-class people & the political parties who claimed to speak for them.
1970s National Front:
It’s an old trick, used by dictators, for the powerful to encourage the less powerful to vent their rage against those who have been their allies, & then to persuade them into thinking that they have been 'liberated'.
It costs the powerful nothing, & it pays frightful dividends.
So Laurence Fox is "honoured" to talk with far-right media group 'Epoch Times', which promotes far-right politicians in Europe, spreads anti-vax & other conspiracy theories, was the second-largest funder of pro-Trump Facebook ads, & is affiliated with the Falun Gong movement.
Epoch Times became a close media ally of Trump, & spread the far-right, pro-Trump QAnon conspiracy theory. It created a network of YouTube channels to pump out election disinformation, one of which claimed the Capitol Hill riot was a "false flag" operation orchestrated by antifa.
Epoch Times has spread #COVID19 misinformation, & has promoted anti-China rhetoric & conspiracy theories around the #coronavirus outbreak, for example through an 8-page special edition called "How the Chinese Communist Party Endangered the World".