This piece by @_KarenHao is a must read if you care about how Facebook effects democracy, and why the company has (intentionally) not tackled the core problems. I was hired just after the Cambridge Analytica scandal to help "fix it". A few observations 1/ technologyreview.com/2021/03/11/102…
When I was at Facebook, I couldn't understand why none of the things I tried to ask/do/explore--combating disinfo in political ads, building voter suppression plan--and was specifically hired to do were rejected or ignored. This paragraph confirms what I've been saying since. 2/
Those of us (and there are many) who argue that Facebook's engagement obsession fuels division and, as my TED talk claims, is helping radicalize people at a speed not seen before, have often been discounted or painted as misguided. Looks like Facebook knew this as well. 👇🏽3/
Again, Facebook knew it prioritized harmful content, including misinformation about the election, and didn't take appropriate steps to fix it. Why? Because, as I've repeatedly said, they didn't want to harm their own growth or anger those with the power to regulate them. 4/
Bottom line: we have left it to Facebook to “self-regulate” again and again, despite scandal after scandal. When will we learn? Currently, there is nothing incentivizing them to put democracy+society+health above power+growth+profit. This must change. The constant... 5/
...“we know we have to do better” PR points…none of it ever addresses the core issue: It’s the business model. It always has been. And it's government’s job to impose costs on those externalities. How much more proof do we need? When will we demand that our representatives...6/
...prioritize this? Yes, there are positive things Facebook does. But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t protect against the bad. There're no easy, magical fixes, but that’s no excuse. It's time for government to step up and incentivize a healthier information ecosystem. Enough. 7/
ergh. *affects.... the nerd in me is cringing at that spelling error.
Really Facebook, this is your response to @_KarenHao's comprehensive piece? Obvious question: why ISN'T your Responsible AI team working on misinformation? But beyond that, clearly her investigation and reporting took her to this conclusion, as opposed to what FB was hoping. 8/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yael Eisenstat

Yael Eisenstat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @YaelEisenstat

22 Feb
Important piece by @CraigSilverman & @RMac18. Facebook’s decisions on far-right content are political, not some grand defense of free speech or democracy. I’ve tried to point this out in pieces about my time working on election integrity at FB. (Thread)
buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanma…
Facebook hired me in 2018 to head a new elections integrity team for ads. I put protecting democracy first, not political preservation. Sharing below pieces not to pat myself on the back, but to show how efforts failed because, as Buzzfeed shows, there was no political will. 2/
In my 1st piece after leaving Facebook, I intentionally wrote about asking my team to prove if we had an anti-conservative bias (we didn’t) as a subtle way of pointing to that issue. I was testing the waters but was much more explicit in future pieces. 3/ wired.com/story/the-real…
Read 11 tweets
6 Aug 20
So much to unpack here, (a thread): 1/ Facebook is being used by our current President to undermine trust in the electoral process, and they continue to allow it to happen, unchecked. And their own employees are speaking up about the real dangers to our democracy. Bravo to them.
2/ Election results could take weeks, so we are in for a very dangerous period after Nov 3. How will FB react if Trump+his allies claim the results are rigged or lie about the results? If they refuse to fact check him now, why should we believe they will react differently then?
3/ "a senior engineer collected internal evidence that showed FB was giving preferential treatment to prominent conservative accounts to help them remove fact-checks... (FB) responded by removing his post... the engineer was fired." If true, this is extremely disturbing.
Read 5 tweets
25 Sep 19
A few thoughts on the #WhistleblowerComplaint, from my former #CIA and #NationalSecurity lens, and having served three Presidents, both Democrat and Republican, (without any comment on this #POTUS, the actual allegations against him, or moves on #impeachment) :
1/Being a #Whistleblower in the Intel Community is never easy, & it almost certainly will affect your future. But we swear an oath to “support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic”, & all Americans should be thankful to those who uphold that oath.
2/Deciding that threat comes from within and merits possibly destroying your own career and personal life to fulfill your oath to the #Constitution has to be the most difficult predicament an Intel Officer will ever face. The #whistleblower never personally wins.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!