Seven incredibly non-intuitive things about growing your career, a thread π
The people whose careers you admire and study the most are the ones your own career starts to emulate.
This seems like a great thing, until you realize along the way the downsides that come with that kind of career.
Every glamour has its price.
(1/7)
We think the most confident person in the room is the one who sounds the most polished and certain.
In reality, the most confident person is the one who most readily admits and accepts *all* their flaws / mistakes.
Imagine how secure one must feel to do that.
(2/7)
It's easy to worship at the alter of productivity and focus.
But the more focused you are on something, the less creative you become. Focus is by definition narrowing. You block out serendipitous connections.
If you want to innovate, you must make the space for it.
(3/7)
Worrying about asking dumb questions or saying the wrong thing leads us to bite our tongues.
But managers usually think most highly of reports who proactively ask questions and share their perspectives.
You have far more to gain than lose in using your voice.
(4/7)
In an effort to not impose on others, we don't ask for help or we make our asks vague ("Can I get time with you?")
In fact, many people do want to help, and it's easier for busy folks to say yes if your ask is specific ("Could I ask for 30 min to get your take on NFTs?")
(5/7)
The mistakes you're most worried about are unlikely to be the ones you make. You'll err on the opposite end instead.
For example, if you're incredibly worried about offending people, you'll rarely do that, but you'll probably avoid giving critical, honest feedback.
(6/7)
We think strength is self-sufficiencyβ achievement without reliance on others.
We think that if someone else gains, we lose.
But intertwined, we all go further. This is the secret of Silicon Valley.
Help others, ask for help, and collective strength multiplies.
(7/7)
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My co-founder Chandra Narayanan's quote has become something of a product-builder's mantra for us: Diagnose with data and treat with design.
There is so much packed into those sentences! Thread going deeper π (1/15)
First: "diagnose with data." The job of data is to help you understand the ground truth of what is going on (with your product, user behavior, the market, etc.)
Typically, we humans run on intuition, a rudimentary kind of pattern-matching. This is insufficient in many cases.
Intuition works if you've studied something deeply (think Serena playing tennis.) But it does not serve you well in:
1) Making decisions for contexts you don't understand 2) Generalizing predictions at huge scale / complexity 3) Optimizing the impact of many tiny decisions
Who is doing art NFTs but in a Patreon / Substack-like way, with subscriptions? Because I'd love to invest in that :D
To expand, what I mean is that today many NFT marketplaces are about collecting the ONLY (or very limited) version of a piece of art, and hence prices can be super high for that. Some number of artists + collectors will benefit from that model, but I suspect a very small %.
A subscription-style model where one can say, "Hey I love Artist X, and now I can subscribe for, say, $30 a month and get an NFT of Artist X's art every month which I know is limited only to subscribers" would allow way more artists and fans to participate.
Do you struggle with "office politics," like when Colleague got a promotion because they seem to have the same hobbies as the boss?
Do you have no idea how to play the game?
Do you recoil at the very word?
Then this thread is for you π
First, what exactly is "office politics?"
The definition I'll go with is that it's the actions people take to advance the things they care about in the workplace.
These can be:
1) The company hitting its goals 2) The success of one's projects and initiatives 3) A promotion 4) A plum assignment or leadership role 4) A change in workplace culture, values or process 5) The advancement of a colleague / group of people 6) Personal reputation