Last year, someone turned the HBO series "Euphoria" on, and I was seriously disgusted within 30min by the graphic sexual interaction that was portrayed as between underage characters:
not b/c it corrupts teens, but b/c it's a thinly veiled replacement for child porn for adults.
not b/c it corrupts teens, but b/c it's a thinly veiled replacement for child porn for adults.
https://twitter.com/ndtv/status/1370240669374029826
I don't know if #BombayBegums has the same degree of fictional exploitation of underage characters as Euphoria did, but there's a reason that it's against the law for actors in porn to pretend to be under 18 -
because it normalizes the desire to rape children.
because it normalizes the desire to rape children.
Discussion is fine. Making out? Whatever.
But if there's full frontal "child" nudity or simulated sex w/ underage characters, any other sexual content that might stimulate arousal _below_ the waist, seriously.
But if there's full frontal "child" nudity or simulated sex w/ underage characters, any other sexual content that might stimulate arousal _below_ the waist, seriously.
That shit could start someone down the road to sexual radicalization.
Any kind of portrayal of sexual activity in those under 18 should be treated as child pornography, unless approved by... some independent child welfare org.
Any kind of portrayal of sexual activity in those under 18 should be treated as child pornography, unless approved by... some independent child welfare org.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
