“the monarchy’s defenders...claim that a queen...stands above politics &...is able to unite the nation in ways a mere president never could. 1 week after The Interview, the BRF themselves have become the fracture line along which the nation has disunited.” theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
“The young and people of colour are overwhelmingly supportive of #MeghanMarkle, perfectly able to recognise the racism within the campaign of tabloid harassment that helped to drive her and Harry into Californian exile.”
“Older people, the demographic super-served by the tabloid press, are far more likely to be both hostile to Markle and blithely dismissive of her racism accusations.”
“The tabloids & what we might call “tabloid TV”, charged by Markle as being the source & the delivery system for much of that racism,have been determined to focus attn on allegations of racism w/in the BRF. It’s not hard to see why they preferred this to standing by their record”
“To most black ppl, the racism of the tabloids is manifest. Yet the industry that spouts racist motifs plucked from gangster rap proclaims its innocence. Part of the problem is that in the Venn diagram that incl those 2 groups–black ppl & tab journos–the circles barely overlap.”
“The press...has an appalling record on diversity & inclusion. Black people make up 3% of the UK pop yet account for just 0.2% of journos. This failure means black Britons simply aren’t in the tabloid newsrooms to pt racism out; they...aren’t in the editor’s chair to weed it out”
“Blind to their own biases and insulated from communities they do not encounter or understand, journalists and editors feel entitled to make judgments about what is and what is not racism.”
“Black people familiar with this kangaroo-court dynamic recognise a no-win situation when they see one. What could be more disingenuous than demanding a black woman prove the existence of racism to people who have just demonstrated their inability to see it?”
“This lack of self-awareness goes some way to explaining the tabloid’s failure of self-interest. For both the press and the palace, the marriage of #MeghanMarkle into the British royal family had the potential to be the greatest rebranding opportunity in marketing history”
“a once in a century opportunity to refresh their reputations and reach new young audiences. Not since Kurt Cobain briefly made the cardigan fashionable in the 1990s has the possibility for such a radical image makeover presented itself. Yet both institutions completely blew it.”
“For a monarchy that places much of its case for relevance on its role at the centre of the Commonwealth – 2.4B mostly black & brown ppl–their inability to embrace & later defend Markle represents a breathtaking ability to fumble a reputational windfall.” theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
“A near slapstick level of PR ineptitude. The tabloids, unable to wean themselves off their addictions to casual racism and instinctive misogyny, were just as blundering.” #HighlySkilledPR
“One reason the royals and the tabloids were unable to grasp the opportunities was that this would have required them to look squarely to the future but, like so many British institutions, they are trapped in a fantasy version of Britain’s past.”
“This is why so many debates in modern Britain eventually become debates about history. We talk the talk about the future...visions of “Global Britain”...but we’re constantly dragged back to face difficult facts that erupt from histories we have papered over & refused to process”
“Take #BlackLivesMatter, a campaign sparked by contemporary racism. Here in Britain...it became primarily a battle over statues & what’s taught in school history lessons.This is b/c defending the imaginary “Little England” version of our past lies w/in the tabloids’ comfort zone”
“Acknowledging contemporary racism does not. [...] Our never-ending festival of backwards-looking ahistoricism continued last week when the all-white, all-male inner priesthood of the outrage industry rushed to defend the monarchy against Markle.”
“While Morgan imploded, Farage claimed that “nobody in the world, in history, has done more for ppl of colour than the BRF”. Even if he was referring only to the current monarch, this still represents something of a kick in the teeth for Nelson Mandela, Rosa Parks & MLK.”
“Trapped in a make-believe past, we’re unable to recognise how our real history shapes our culture & our attitudes. Fearful of confronting that true past, we struggle to reshape our institutions for the future even when gifted an extraordinary opp for renewal” #BestRoyalReads
An incredible piece of writing from @DavidOlusoga. Glad to have his voice on this topic.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Calling out UK journalists for cyber bullying...familiar themes.
“It felt like much of the media’s reporting of the issue played down the defamation, racism & harassment in favour of framing me as part of the woke mob – & Burchill as its victim.” theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
“Last week, the Society of Editors was embroiled in a row after its then-executive director, Ian Murray, claimed that the UK media “is most certainly not racist” in response to Meghan’s criticism of how she’d been treated by the press.”
“But what my experience with Burchill shows is that not only is there racism from journalists themselves, there’s also a lack of accountability more broadly within the industry.”
“So when Olivia Crellin, the founder of the PressPad Charitable Foundation (@PressPadUK), heard that Prince #HarryAndMeghan were interested in supporting her cause to diversify the media, it was only natural that her reaction was one of disbelief.” hellomagazine.com/royalty/202103…
"It's been so surreal," Olivia told HELLO! shortly after it was announced that #HarryAndMeghan's #Archewell Foundation had teamed up with @PressPadUK as one of its donors. "I'm still in total disbelief, just thrilled.”
“"It's been such a crazy week for so many people who have been touched by the issues that came up in the Sussexes' Oprah interview, & here we are at @PressPadUK, doing our thing as a small social enterprise...”
“Britain’s greatest enemy is apparently an outspoken Black woman. [...] In her descriptions of racist treatment by the public and the palace, it calls to question where in society Black women are safe if a Black member of the Royal Family wasn't.” teenvogue.com/story/meghan-m…
“If a Black woman isn’t protected even when she’s under the family’s wing, how can our non-royal citizens ever feel safe? And, how can these citizens feel safe speaking up against power? Well, maybe that’s the point.”
“The British press’s hatred toward Meghan and the Crown’s refusal to protect her seems like a sign of society’s desire to silence Black women and reveals a very painful truth about the racism embedded deep within British society: that it’s still very much alive.”
“The details revealed in Oprah’s interview with the Sussexes underscore the long and unacknowledged history of colonial slavery, white privilege, and racism in Britain, particularly within the royal family.” spiegel.de/international/…
“Royal protocol dictates that the British monarchy avoid expressing political opinions. But the addition of Meghan Markle to the royal family offered a readymade opportunity for the institution to embrace change and signal a willingness to make amends for past sins.”
“As a young, mixed-race royal couple, the Sussexes were uniquely positioned to assist the British monarchy to strengthen ties with the Commonwealth nations and offer moral leadership as Britain reckons with its brutal imperial past.”
.@valentinelow shared that he knew Meghan was distraught during the summer of 2019 & had met with HR. Let’s talk about all the ways this is wrong...
- Pvt convo w/ HR is leaked to press
- Press abuse escalated
- Series of pvt jet articles about a vacay that Meghan clearly needed
He has the caucasity to suggest there’s a way in which someone could express concern over how dark #HarryAndMeghan’s child might be that wouldn’t be racist. He’s more concerned about the reputational damage to an unnamed member of the BRF from the allegation than the actual act.
He appears to be laughing during the discussion of racism. Maybe he was aghast vs. incredulous which is what it sounds like here. I’d be willing to give him the benefit of the doubt but since he doesn’t believe #HarryAndMeghan were trying to protect family members maybe I won’t.
“Last wk judgment was handed down in the case of HRH #DuchessOfSussex v ANL. The DoS, otherwise known as #MeghanMarkle, was successful in her application for summary judgment in her privacy & copyright claims (save for 1 tech pt in relation to the latter)” holdthefrontpage.co.uk/2021/news/law-…
The starting pt is clear enough: we have known for a long time that personal correspondence Btwn individuals is private and there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of it. That reasonable expectation of privacy can only be overcome if it is in the public interest”
“Some legal commentators are hailing this judgment as a disastrous ruling for the press & a win for PR specialists...Others...are pointing out that the correspondence in question would always have been deemed to be pvt, subject to the public interest overriding that assumption.””