As over 100,000 people sign our petition opposing The Police, Crime and Sentencing Bill, convincing a Tory government with an 80-seat majority is tough. That’s why Netpol is also making equally tough demands on @PoliceChiefs who lobbied for new legislation netpol.org/2021/03/15/tho…
We need to #KillTheBill but we need more. We've two simple demands on the police. Either set out what "respecting international human rights standards" for policing protests means in practice or say why you won't. Enough guessing what restrictions you'll impose on our rights next
Netpol spent many years attempting, with the support in particular of @TheGreenParty MEP Keith Taylor, to put pressure on senior officers to complete a review into the way the policing of anti-fracking protests was conducted theguardian.com/environment/20…#FreedomToProtest
After pressure from Netpol, in Sept 2019 @PoliceChiefs finally released new draft guidance. It was terrible – so hopelessly misguided in its understanding of human rights obligations that even @HMICFRS criticised it in a report last week netpol.org/2019/09/30/net…
That's why we have written our own set of standards, based on the experience and feedback of campaigning groups. It focuses not only on public order laws but on police tactics like kettling and dispersal and on intrusive surveillance. Find out more at netpol.org/charter/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@SistersUncut 2/ House said the tweet was a “typical preparatory tweet before a demonstration, but not before a vigil”.
There is so much wrong with this arguement it is staggering. *Takes a deep breath.*
@SistersUncut 3/ Those preparing for the vigil were right to share information about what to do when faced with police repression. The Met had clearly indicated that they were going to crack down on the vigil.
Threats to set social services onto women protesters with children, or report disabled protesters to the Department for Work & Pensions, were reported to us many times by the anti-fracking movement. These were all attempts to disrupt their campaigns
Salford Social Service employee at the Barton Moss anti-fracking camp in 2013
As the government seeks to push through new draconian public order laws, thousands of people are demanding a fundamental change. So what does our Charter for Freedom of Assembly Rights actually say? netpol.org/2021/03/15/tho…#FreedomToProtest
1. Public assemblies need not only facilitation, but also protection
2. Public assemblies need protection based on equality and non-discrimination
Today we are helping students from @OfficialUoM publicise their "Report on Police Harassment on Manchester University Campus 2020-2021" and their call for #copsoffcampus. Read their guest post and download the report netpol.org/2021/03/12/cop…
This report is written by a group of students in #CopsOffCampus, all of whom have witnessed first-hand the treatment of students by the authorities on campus.
The government has just announced new legislation restricting #FreedomToProtest. The Police, Crime and Sentencing bill introduces a raft of repressive changes + buried in it are new powers for policing protests
This vindictive piece of legislation comes from Priti Patel's fury over the Black Lives Matter uprisings, +the struggle to police XR protests. These new police powers will affect all of our movements.
Protests are disruptive. That's the POINT of them. But proposed changes to the law make it an offence to cause "annoyance" or "inconvenience". That's most forms of public protest actions.....
Today @HMICFRS launched its report on policing protests, which provides a green light to more surveillance on campaigners and confirms the new name for "domestic extremist" is "aggravated activist".
HMICFRS reports that a new policing unit has “provided good-quality and useful intelligence in relation to protest activity, including from Black Lives Matter and Extinction Rebellion” #GettingTheBalanceWrong
The new definition says aggravated activism is "activity that seeks to bring about political or social change but does so in a way that involves unlawful behaviour or criminality, has a negative impact upon community tensions, or causes an adverse economic impact to businesses"