As the government seeks to push through new draconian public order laws, thousands of people are demanding a fundamental change. So what does our Charter for Freedom of Assembly Rights actually say? netpol.org/2021/03/15/tho…#FreedomToProtest
1. Public assemblies need not only facilitation, but also protection
2. Public assemblies need protection based on equality and non-discrimination
3. Potential disruption is not an automatic excuse for denying protection for assemblies
4. The use of civil disobedience and direct action tactics are not an automatic excuse for denying protection for assemblies
5. The use of police powers to collectively restrict the right to freedom of assembly is justifiable only in exceptional circumstances
6. Although public assemblies are collective activities, protesters are individually rather than collectively responsible for their actions
7. Choosing to take part in a public assembly is not an invitation to surveillance and denial of privacy
8. Organisers of public assemblies, not the police, must decide their level of communication and dialogue
9. Independent monitoring of the policing of protests is essential for defending the right to organise and participate in public assemblies
10. Imposing financial burdens on organisers restricts the right to freedom of assembly
11. The police have a particular duty to protect the rights of vulnerable or disabled people wishing to exercise their rights to freedom of assembly
In the absence of any other meaningful guidance available to local forces, we are calling on the National Police Chiefs Council and the College of Policing to adopt these eleven statements by endorsing the Charter for Freedom of Assembly Rights.
If they refuse to, then they need to tell us why?
Because every one of these 11 statements is based on international human rights guidelines and case law
Download our detailed briefing setting out the case for transparency and accountability in the policing of rights to freedom of assembly #RightToProtestnetpol.org/wp-content/upl…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@SistersUncut 2/ House said the tweet was a “typical preparatory tweet before a demonstration, but not before a vigil”.
There is so much wrong with this arguement it is staggering. *Takes a deep breath.*
@SistersUncut 3/ Those preparing for the vigil were right to share information about what to do when faced with police repression. The Met had clearly indicated that they were going to crack down on the vigil.
Threats to set social services onto women protesters with children, or report disabled protesters to the Department for Work & Pensions, were reported to us many times by the anti-fracking movement. These were all attempts to disrupt their campaigns
Salford Social Service employee at the Barton Moss anti-fracking camp in 2013
As over 100,000 people sign our petition opposing The Police, Crime and Sentencing Bill, convincing a Tory government with an 80-seat majority is tough. That’s why Netpol is also making equally tough demands on @PoliceChiefs who lobbied for new legislation netpol.org/2021/03/15/tho…
We need to #KillTheBill but we need more. We've two simple demands on the police. Either set out what "respecting international human rights standards" for policing protests means in practice or say why you won't. Enough guessing what restrictions you'll impose on our rights next
Netpol spent many years attempting, with the support in particular of @TheGreenParty MEP Keith Taylor, to put pressure on senior officers to complete a review into the way the policing of anti-fracking protests was conducted theguardian.com/environment/20…#FreedomToProtest
Today we are helping students from @OfficialUoM publicise their "Report on Police Harassment on Manchester University Campus 2020-2021" and their call for #copsoffcampus. Read their guest post and download the report netpol.org/2021/03/12/cop…
This report is written by a group of students in #CopsOffCampus, all of whom have witnessed first-hand the treatment of students by the authorities on campus.
The government has just announced new legislation restricting #FreedomToProtest. The Police, Crime and Sentencing bill introduces a raft of repressive changes + buried in it are new powers for policing protests
This vindictive piece of legislation comes from Priti Patel's fury over the Black Lives Matter uprisings, +the struggle to police XR protests. These new police powers will affect all of our movements.
Protests are disruptive. That's the POINT of them. But proposed changes to the law make it an offence to cause "annoyance" or "inconvenience". That's most forms of public protest actions.....
Today @HMICFRS launched its report on policing protests, which provides a green light to more surveillance on campaigners and confirms the new name for "domestic extremist" is "aggravated activist".
HMICFRS reports that a new policing unit has “provided good-quality and useful intelligence in relation to protest activity, including from Black Lives Matter and Extinction Rebellion” #GettingTheBalanceWrong
The new definition says aggravated activism is "activity that seeks to bring about political or social change but does so in a way that involves unlawful behaviour or criminality, has a negative impact upon community tensions, or causes an adverse economic impact to businesses"