Don’t ostracise drugs users – empathise with them: Dr Gabor Maté was recently awarded the Order of Canada for his work on trauma and addiction. The following is adapted from his book ‘In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts: Close Encounters with Addiction’: 1/37 #March4Justice
“From Abraham to the Aztecs, ancient cultures exacted human sacrifices to appease the gods – that is, to soothe their own anxieties and to placate false beliefs. Today, we have our own version of this, as evidenced by the overdose crisis sweeping North America. 2/37
These lost lives are offered up, we might say, for the appeasement of our own false beliefs and denial. Addicted people are victimised by our society’s disinclination to come to terms with the root sources, psychology and neurobiology of addiction, 3/37
especially of substance dependence. We could stem the fatal tide, end the sacrificial cycle, if we grasped what drug use is really all about, recognised the universality of addictions throughout our culture and adopted practices that reflected reality rather than prejudice: 4/37
In other words, if, instead of ostracising drug users, we grounded our approach in science and empathy. 5/37
These “ifs” have never been more urgent than now, and not only because of opioids and other substances of addiction. The World Health Organization has declared “gaming disorder” to be a significant threat to mental health and social functioning. 6/37
Need we mention the devastating prevalence of addictive overeating, sexual compulsion, pathological gambling or shopping? Or the lethality of perfectly legal habits such as
cigarette smoking or excessive drinking. 7/37
We shame and marginalise drug users to camouflage our discomfort with the broad reach of addiction in our culture. The essence of all addictive habits was succinctly expressed by former heroin user, Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards: 8/37
“It was a search for oblivion, I suppose, though not intentionally,” he writes. “The convolutions you go through just not to be you for a few hours.” 9/47
Why are people so uncomfortable in their own skins that they need to escape themselves, even at the risk of self-harm? What engenders such unbearable pain in human beings that they would knowingly risk their very lives to escape it? 10/37
“We need to talk about what drives people to take drugs,” the famed trauma psychiatrist Bessel van der Kolk has said, pointing out that there is almost a direct correlation between childhood trauma and addiction. 11/37
“People that feel good about themselves don’t do things that endanger their bodies… Traumatised people feel agitated, restless, tight in chest. You hate the way you feel. They take drugs in order to stabilise their bodies.” 12/37
“I’m not going to ask you what you were addicted to,” I often say to people, “nor when, nor for how long. Only –whatever your addiction – what did you like about it? What, in the short term, did it give you that you craved so much?” 13/37
Universally, the answers are: “It helped me escape emotional pain… it numbed me… helped me deal with stress… gave me peace of mind… a sense of connection with others… a sense of control.” 14/37
Such responses illuminate that addiction is neither a choice nor primarily a disease, genetic or acquired. It originates in a person’s attempt to solve genuine human problems: those of emotional loss, of overwhelming stress, of lost connection. 15/37
Hence my mantra: the first question is not, “Why the addiction?” but “Why the pain?” In my 12 years of work in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside, the answer could not have been more stark. Every single one of my female patients had suffered sexual abuse as a child. 16/47
None of my patients – male or female – had been spared major trauma of some kind. Not all addictions stem from such severe hurt, but all are rooted in sorrow, helplessness, and alienation. 17/37
“Even the most harmful addictions serve a vital adaptive function for dislocated individuals,” Bruce Alexander writes in his seminal work, The Globalization of Addiction: A Study in the Poverty of the Spirit. 18/47
“Only severely dislocated people are vulnerable to addiction.” By dislocation he means “an enduring lack of psychosocial integration.” Whether we call it dislocation or trauma, there is no effective way of addressing addiction without addressing its fundamental origins. 19/37
As a society we are far from embracing this inescapable truth, in face of all the scientific, narrative and epidemiological evidence for it. 20/37
Forty years ago, I graduated from medical school at the University of British Columbia without ever, in four years, hearing a single mention of psychological trauma and its impact on human health and development. 21/37
Disturbingly, nor do most medical students even today, despite the voluminous and persuasive research linking trauma to mental and physical illness and addiction. 22/37
“What the data look like is a society gripped by despair, with a surge of unhealthy behaviours and an epidemic of drugs,” the Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman wrote in The New York Times back in 2015. The situation has only grown more dire since then. 23/37
How are we to address the manifestations of despair without addressing the despair itself? How are health practitioners to help people when they themselves remain ignorant – by training! – of the source of the problems their patients present with, 24/37
when academia and major treatment institutions have yet to absorb the new knowledge? How, in the absence of awareness is the legal system to address addiction? How is the political system to confront it rationally? 25/37
How, in the end, can society cope with an epidemic it misperceives? The circumstances that promote despair – and therefore, addiction – are with each decade, more and more entrenched in the global industrialized world: 26/37
more stress, more economic insecurity, more inequality, more fear, more anxiety among youth, more isolation and loneliness. As the magazine Adbusters noted: “You have 2,672 friends and an average of 30 likes per post and no one to have dinner with on a Saturday.” 27/37
If there is any positive glimmer in the current opioid crisis, it is the possibility of change. We are being forced to re-examine our assumptions. Harm-reduction practices, such as supervised drug-use sites are now being implemented across the country. 28/37
Two of our national parties are at least discussing ending the insanity of the so-called War on Drugs (really a war on traumatized people), of adopting the realism and humanism of a country such as Portugal, where the possession of substances 29/30
for personal use has been decriminalized, with remarkable results. Beyond legal questions, heartening possibilities for healing arise from a broader understanding of addiction and from an appreciation of its sources in human suffering. 30/37
Required for treatment is a multilevel approach that accepts people as they are, in which compassion replaces stigmatization and rehabilitation supplants punishment. 31/37
This would include: Supervised drug-use sites in as many communities as feasible; for those who need them, medically supervised opiates or opiate substitute maintenance, while for others, abstinence-based programs, without legal or moral coercion; 32/37
for all, personalized trauma therapy, recognizing that there is no one-size-fits-all solution. Everyone working with addicted humans needs to be trained in trauma. 33/37
We also have much to learn from the resilience and age-old teachings of those who among us who have, as a community, suffered the most from trauma, dislocation, and addiction: the people of Canada’s First Nations. Their traditional values always emphasized
communality 34/37
rather than dog-eat-dog individualism, restoration of the fallen to the community rather than retribution, inclusion rather than separation, and, most importantly, a view of human beings that balances our physical with our mental, emotional and spiritual needs. 35/37
Current social, legal and medical responses to addiction have long ago demonstrated their inadequacy. Our mounting losses, our needless human sacrifices, cry out for a radical revision. 36/37
Source: Dr Gabor Maté (2018). Special to the Globe and Mail. Human development through the lens of science and compassion: drgabormate.com 37/37
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How to Prevent Trauma from Becoming PTSD: “The good news is that the intensity of emotional pain always reduces with time. This is not just a trite sentiment, as there are neurological studies that have found the ways the brain works to heal emotional wounds. 1/19 #March4Justice
The brain is geared for survival and is always looking for new threats and information, which means old experiences eventually route to the back of the line to direct your attentional resources to what is new and potentially important. 2/19
My clients often respond to this concept by stating: “This can't be true, because I have been in the same emotional pain for so long, and my traumatic event was years and years ago.” 3/19
“A new type of survivor guilt: The term survivor guilt is usually used to describe emotional distress some people feel after surviving a traumatic event in which others have died, such as a natural disaster or terrorist attack.
It has been identified in military veterans, 1/14
those who survived the Holocaust, 9/11 survivors, and emergency first responders. COVID-19 has certainly been a traumatic experience and has had a profound impact on mental health. Around 1,000 people have died by suicide in Australia since it began and 2/14
modelling from the University of Sydney found suicide deaths could rise by 25% annually for the next five years. During COVID-19 we have witnessed the conventional type of survivor guilt associated with surviving the coronavirus when hundreds of thousands haven’t. 3/14
Disoriented-Disorganized Attachment Pattern and Increased Risk of Further Traumatization (Part 2/2): “Established insecure attachment patterns are empirically associated with a higher rate of traumatic events and subsequent trauma. 1/23
Further trauma has a disastrous impact on affective and socio-cognitive development. Sexual or aggressive exposures of abuse by a parent, for example, are particularly devastating if they are based on a previous relational context of emotional neglect. 2/23
They may promote “identification with the aggressor” and, as a result, may create intrapsychic relational representations of “perpetrators and victims” in rapid reversals. However, this dominant pattern is based on a massive obstruction of general mentalization functions. 3/23
Psychobiology of Attachment and Trauma—Some General Remarks From a Clinical Perspective (Part 1/2): “Early representatives of psychoanalysis argued that the roots of human social motivation are primarily physical and sensory (hunger, sexuality) 1/31
and that satisfaction and/or frustration of these needs lead to the infant’s initial approach to the mother. John Bowlby (1907–1990) strongly opposed this theoretical approach. Based on numerous empirical observations he developed a different theory: 2/31
the infant’s hunger for its mother’s love and presence is as great as its hunger for food. Attachment is therefore a “primary motivational system” with its own workings. Rene Spitz had made similar empirical observations with orphaned children some years earlier. 3/31
How to use ‘The Hand Model of the Brain’ to Explain our Reaction to Stress: Dr. Daniel Siegel’s hand model of the brain helps children imagine what’s happening inside their brain when they get upset so that they can identify and deal with the emotions more effectively. 1/10
First, let’s see what the hand model of the brain looks like: As its name suggests, you need to use your hand for this. Your wrist is the spinal cord upon which the brain sits, your palm is the inner brainstem, and your thumb is your amygdala (or guard dog). 2/10
If you place your thumb in the palm, you’ll form the limbic system. Your other fingers are your cerebral cortex, and the tips of your fingers are your prefrontal cortex (or wise owl). 3/10
Important Thread: What is Trauma-informed Care and Practice? What is Blue Knot’s vision for a trauma-informed world? Want to become trauma-informed? 1/28 #March4Justice#EnoughIsEnough
“Trauma-Informed Practice is a strengths-based framework grounded in an understanding of and responsiveness to the impact of trauma, that emphasises physical, psychological, and emotional safety for everyone, and that creates opportunities 2/28
for survivors to rebuild a sense of control and empowerment (Hopper et al., 2010). Trauma-informed care and practice recognises the prevalence of trauma and its impact on the emotional, psychological and social wellbeing of people and communities. 3/28