The C19 response in Canada has been a tragic debacle that will impoverish this nation. At the heart of this disaster was wild exaggeration of viral threats which now scar society. It never had to happen and the science reveals that. Let's dig a bit deeper. 1/
This recent paper looking at seroprevalence peaked my interest again. It's a clever study that argues that 90% of Canadians have pre existing co-immunity to C19. Antibodies in adult sera recognize four surface proteins on c19 including Spike. 2/
The authors argue that co-immunity results from previous coronavirus infections. Note, these values starkly contrast the now forgotten seroprevalence work of Canadian Blood Services which argued for 1-2% seroprevalence. Why the difference? ....3 cp24.com/mobile/news/mo…
It comes down to the clever use of newborn blood samples as the naive baseline control rather than pre 2020 adult blood. A baseline is essential for comparison as if antibody levels are already elevated, its harder to see a viral response. A basic mistake. ...4/
The authors carefully point out the usual caveats that co-immunity isn't as strong as true C19 infection response. Fair point but the findings seem clear enough. The majority of Canadians had reasonable protection to C19.....5/
These findings nicely parallel T-cell observations in uninfected adults. Pre existing T-cell immunity has also been attributed to previous coronavirus infections. So two layers of immunological protection. .....6/
This protection bears itself out in Canada's skewed C19 death statistics which shows the elderly with multiple comorbities are at mosy risk. They are the most immune compromised. This data has been publicly available from the beginning....7/
This protection also bears itself out in Canada's all cause mortality data which shows a very modest rise as a result of three factors.
1) C19 deaths 2) Lockdown deaths in the elderly 3) Deaths of despair in the youth and those of working age.....8/
This preceding interpretation aligns with Ontario's ongoing public inquiry into LTCs and a recent Statscan report. Note, a fourth category of death will soon emerge that being 'Death by inadequate health care access".....9/
Anyways, I digress. The data above should tell us that C19 was never a threat to Canada's general population. As such, there is no need for lockdowns, masks, social distancing or the other nonsense....10/
Focused protection as highlighted in the GBD is what we need. Resources should have been aligned with risk and it is a catastrophic mistake not to do so. Likewise, the vaccination process should have been focused. 11/
Unfortunately, our public health officials seems hell bent on ignoring science again and engaging in a wasteful mass vaccination campaign. And of course society must be held hostage until its completed. .... 12/
Perhaps, our public health officials believe this is for the best. Then again, they and our politicians could be panicking as science informs the rest of us of their mistakes. They have dug a huge hole and I mean huge......13/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Science is transformative when its power is used wisely to guide public policy. Its not easy to harness but on occasion, you find someone with the essential leadership skills. Let us consider the case of Gov Desantis of Flordia. 1/
Gov DeSantis broke from orthodoxy in Sept 2020, rejecting lockdowns, masks and social distancing to implement a traditional but enlightened public health approach to C19. It was grounded on sound epidemiological principles, later expressed in the Great Barington Declaration. 2/
The policy was implemented to the consternation of the chattering class. Risk groups were identified, focused protection applied and a risk based vaccination process put into action. Schools and businesses were opened and the state flourished. 3/
A debate rages in the British Medical Journal on the concept of "Social Murder". A firm definition has yet emerge but it entails:
A person in authority, coercing public action, under the guise of public health, that is knowingly murderous based on available evidence. ....2/
Certainly, murder in its various forms has been carefully codified by the legal profession. So why not "Social Murder"? Is their a group of enterprising lawyers who would like to take on the task? ......3/
This beautiful bit of data from Michigan, a state next to Ontario (my province) nicely shows you everything. C19 hit populated areas first in spring and more rural areas the following season. You can see, seasonality, regionality, and herd immunity. The virus is now endemic.
So, a virus will be a virus. It will spread where it wants and we see its impact when in season. You can pretend to control it with lockdowns, masks and the other silly nonsense. It doesn't care about your feelings or what you think.
2/
We were told this would happen by the likes of @FatEmperor and Anders Tegnell. But the powers to be, hired people to discredit them saying they were dangerously misinformed. They weren't but took the abuse anyways. There is a price to be paid for being right.
3/
Many have watched in horror as an undisciplined group of cloistered academics/public health officials blundered their way across the social, economic and educational landscape of the country. Edict by heresay, hunches and ignorant modeling.
2/
Blunder after blunder rolled on, no transparency or accountability, as our public health community and political class silenced dissent through crude propaganda and the regressive application of behavioral psychology. It was disgusting.
3/
The two most important things to remember about the C19 response.
1) It's the single largest social policy blunder ever in Canadian history.
2) It didn't have to be this way.
Lets break it down.
1/
What do we say about an unprepared public health community. They:
1) Badly miscalculated the threat.
2) Implemented draconian policy wildly disproportionate to the threat.
3) Had no ability to adjust.
4) Had no exit strategy other than a high risk vaccine ploy.
2/
It's been a slow motion disaster, with policy failure and weak political leadership driving it forward. Its hard not to get angry at the blundering mess public health and gov't have wrought upon a prosperous nation. The word "ineptitude" seems rather fitting.
3/
These editorial sentiments are well meaning but lets be clear. The C19 response has revealed the dark art of public health as destructive and incompatible with 21st century life. Much to criticize especially its use of behavioral psychology....1/
Canada's C19 response started with two blundering mistakes. 1) wildly inaccurate claims of a viral threat; and 2) vaccines were the only way out. Both were disturbingly naive, but moving forward it locked Canada into a dangerous narrative....2/
That narrative involves the use of behavioral psychology to raise general anxiety and to reinforce conformity of thought and action. These dangerous weapons pull apart the underpinnings of society and shattered the psychological grounding of too many Canadians....3/