Middlesbrough’s 2019/20 financial results covered a season when they finished 17th in the Championship. Neil Warnock replaced Jonathan Woodgate as manager in June. Some thoughts in the following thread #Boro
#Boro swung from £2m profit before tax to club record £36m loss, as finances hit by COVID and expiry of parachute payments. Revenue dropped £36m (65%) from £56m to £19m and profit on player sales fell £30m to £3m, partly offset by £27m (31%) cut in expenses. Loss after tax £31m.
All three #Boro revenue streams fell, especially broadcasting, which was down £32m (78%) from £41m to £9m, due to no parachute payment. Also decreases in commercial, down £2.7m (31%) from £8.6m to £5.9m, and gate receipts, down £1.6m (26%) from £6.1m to £4.5m.
#Boro partially compensated for the revenue decline by cutting costs. Wage bill fell £9m (23%) from £40m to £31m, while player amortisation and impairment were down a third (£9m) to £18m. Other expenses were £8m (56%) lower.
#Boro other operating income rose £1.7m to £1.9m, including £1.2m from the Premier League relating to the Elite Player Performance Plan (EPPP) as a contribution towards the Category 1 Academy and £0.6m for the government furlough scheme for the pandemic.
#Boro loss of £36m is the worst reported to date in the 2019/20 Championship, though this result may well look better when other clubs publish their COVID-impacted accounts. In fact, even before the pandemic, many clubs had losses above £20m.
It is also worth noting that some clubs’ figures were boosted by once-off accounting profits from the sale of stadiums, training grounds and land, especially #DCFC £40m, #SWFC £38m and #AVFC £36m, so their underlying figures were even worse than reported.
Excluding property sales, just 3 Championship clubs were profitable with only Hull City managing to make money so far in 2019/20. The sad reality is that almost all clubs in this division lose money, as they strive to remain competitive in pursuit of promotion to the top flight.
One reason for #Boro’s worse financial result is they only made £3m profit from player sales, whereas the prior year’s figures were boosted by £33m, including Traoré to #WWFC, Gibson to Burnley and Bamford to #LUFC. This was a lot less than Bristol City £26m and Hull City £23m.
Although #Boro have generated a profit twice in the last four years, including £7m in the Premier League in 2017, they have generally posted fairly large losses. In fact, their cumulative losses over the last decade add up to £145m, averaging nearly £15m a season.
One way that #Boro have tried to become more sustainable is player trading. They have increased profit on player sales to an annual average of £16m over the past 4 years. This season included the sales of Braithwaite to Leganes, Randolph to #WHUFC and Flint to Cardiff.
#Boro operating losses (i.e. excluding player sales and interest payable) widened from £30m to £38m, having been only £4m in the Premier League in 2017. In fairness, almost all Championship clubs report substantial operating losses (nearly half of them more than £30m).
#Boro revenue has fallen by £102m (84%) from £121m to £19m since relegation from the Premier League 3 years ago, very largely due to £93m decrease in broadcasting after parachute payments ended after 2 years, though also reductions in commercial £5m and gate receipts £4m.
Following the decrease, #Boro £19m revenue is firmly in the bottom half of the Championship, significantly below clubs benefiting from parachute payments, e.g. in 2018/19 these included WBA £71m, Stoke City £71m and Swansea City £68m.
Championship revenue is hugely influenced by Premier League parachute payments, making it difficult for clubs like #Boro to compete. Seven clubs benefited from these in 2019/20, led by Cardiff City, #FFC £42m and #HTAFC (£42m), followed by Stoke City, Swansea City and WBA (£34m).
If parachute payments were excluded, #Boro £19m would still be a fair way below the leading clubs. The gap to the highest placed club Leeds United (in 2018/19) would be reduced, but it would still be a chunky £30m.
#Boro broadcasting income fell £32m (78%) from £41m to £9m after parachute payments stopped, down from £102m in 2017. Most Championship clubs earn between £8m and £10m in TV money, but there is a big gap to clubs with parachute payments (over £50m for WBA, Swansea and Stoke).
#Boro match day income fell £1.6m (26%) to £4.5m, as they staged 4 fewer cup games and played 4 home games behind closed doors due to the pandemic. Has decreased 3 years in a row, so is now one of the lowest in the Championship, just ahead of Millwall.
#Boro average attendance dropped from 23,217 to 19,993 for games played with fans, down 35% from 30,449 in the top flight in 2017. This was 11th highest in the Championship, over 15,000 below #LUFC 35,322. Small ticket price increase, only second in 16 years at the Riverside.
#Boro commercial revenue fell £2.7m (31%) from £8.6m to £5.9m, comprising sponsorship & commercial, down £1.7m to £4.5m, and merchandising, down £1.0m to £1.4m. Middlesbrough’s lowest since 2014 and less than half Bristol City’s £14m in 2019/20 Championship.
In 2018/19 #Boro changed both their main sponsors. A “record-breaking three-year partnership” saw online casino 32Red become the new shirt sponsor, though long-standing Ramsdens switched to back-of-shirt, while kit supplier Adidas was replaced by a five-year deal with Hummel.
#Boro wage bill was cut 23% (£9m) from £40m to £31m, as the club “significantly reduced the size and cost of the playing squad” and made some redundancies to offset the reduction in income. Wages down 52% (£34m) from £65m peak three years ago in the Premier League.
Following the decrease, #Boro £31m wage bill is now in the bottom half of the Championship, making promotion even more difficult. Far below the likes of Aston Villa £83m, Stoke City £56m (both with parachute payments) and Norwich City £51m (promotion bonus) – all 2018/19 figures.
#Boro wages to turnover ratio shot up from 72% to 160%, the second highest to date in the Championship in 2019/20, only behind Preston 163%. This is obviously not great, but is pretty much par for the course in the Championship, where 17 of the 24 clubs are above 100%
#Boro directors remuneration was just £2k, one of the lowest in the Championship, a lot less than the likes of Reading £1.5m, WBA £953k, Birmingham City £932k and Stoke City £858k. That said, accounts note that one director was remunerated by another group company.
#Boro other expenses (i.e. excluding wages, player amortisation and depreciation) decreased by £8m (56%) from £15m to £7m without any real explanation (beyond less activity in the pandemic), though prior year was on the high side compared to other years in the Championship.
#Boro player amortisation, the annual charge to write-off transfer fees over a player’s contract, fell £8m (28%) from £26m to £18m, though up from just £4m in 2015, reflecting the investment in the squad. Still one of the highest in the Championship.
#Boro made £6m player purchases, mainly Dijksteel and Stojanovic. This was only around a tenth of the massive £66m spend of two years ago, which former manager Tony Pulis described as “the most disastrous transfer window in the club’s history”.
In the three years between 2016 and 2018 #Boro really pushed the boat out, as they averaged gross spend of £52m, compared to £6m in the preceding five years. However, in the two years since then, this has dropped to £9m with £27m sales, leading to £18m net sales.
#Boro gross debt rose £11m from £105m to £116m, all of which is owed to Steve Gibson. The debt would have been even higher if £63m had not been converted into share capital, highlighting the owner’s financial support.
#Boro £116m gross debt is the third highest in the Championship, only below #BRFC £142m & Stoke City £141m. However, like almost all debt in this division, it has been provided interest-free by the owner, so is very much of the “soft” variety.
#Boro have managed to reduce transfer debt from £29m to £8m, down from £56m in 2018. Partly offset by £2m owed to Middlesbrough by other clubs, so net £6m payable. In addition, £7m potential performance-related liabilities, based on appearances, promotion, etc.
#Boro do not include a cash flow statement in their accounts, so we do not know exactly how much interest the club actually paid, though the £1.3m shown as interest payable in the profit and loss account would place them among the highest in the Championship.
#Boro cash balance fell slightly from £210k to £167k, which is the second smallest in the Championship. In fairness, 16 clubs in this division had less than £2m cash in the bank, so this is not unusual (albeit not a great buffer in the current situation).
Despite the hefty 2019/20 loss, #Boro have no FFP issues, as their reported £40m loss over 3-year monitoring period was only £1m above the £39m limit, even before deducting allowable deductions for academy, community & infrastructure and COVID impact.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
While Manchester City have hit some bad form on the pitch recently, their financial results for the 2023/24 season were pretty impressive, featuring a new Premier League revenue record of £715m and a substantial £74m profit #MCFC
City's revenue slightly increased to £715m, which means that this has risen by more than a third (£180m) in just five years from the 2019 pre-pandemic level of £535m. Growth has been led by commercial, which now accounts for 48% of total income #MCFC
Player trading has become increasingly important to City, having made £122m in 2022/23 and £139m in 2023/24. Up until 2019/20 the club had not generated more than £40m, so they have significantly improved this area of their operations #MCFC
Review of Rangers' financial results for the 2023/24 season, when when they finished as runners-up in the SPFL Premiership for the third year in a row, were defeated in the Scottish Cup Final, but did win the League Cup. Also reached the Europa League last 16 #RangersFC
After two years of small losses, when they very nearly broke-even, Rangers lost £17m before tax, mainly because profit from player sales dropped from £24m to £6m #RangersFC
Rangers' revenue rose £4.5m (5%) from £83.8m to a club record £88.3m, which means that this has grown by an impressive £35.1m (66%) in the last five years from £53.2m #RangersFC
Review of Manchester United's financial results for the 2023/24 season. As always, #MUFC are the first Premier League club to publish their accounts.
The period included official confirmation of the deal whereby Sir Jim Ratcliffe acquired a 27.7% stake in United.
On the plus side, revenue rose £14m (2%) from £648m to a new club record of £662m, while profit from player sales increased from £20m to £37m, United's best result for 15 years #MUFC
However, the pre-tax loss quadrupled, widening by £98m from £33m to £131m, the second worst in United’s history. Club has posted a loss 5 years in a row, compared to healthy profits in five of the six years up to 2018/19 #MUFC
A deep dive into this summer's transfer window, focusing on the Premier League, but also looking at the other major leagues.
Chelsea had the highest gross transfer spend in the Premier League for the third year in a row, i.e. ever since the Clearlake Capital crew arrived, with a hefty £265m.
Lowest gross spends were at Manchester City £25m and Liverpool £43m.
#CFC #MCFC #LFC
However, Chelsea once again had the highest player sales of £186m, followed by Aston Villa £172m and Manchester City £168m.
#CFC #AVFC #MCFC
As Sunderland prepare for the new season, I took a look at the club's focus on sustainability. How close are they to achieving this and what are the implications for the performance on the pitch? #SAFC
The last available accounts from the 2022/23 season are now a full year out of date, but they still offer some indications of how well the strategy is working #SAFC
The bad news is that Sunderland have reported losses 17 years in a row, adding up to a hefty £272m. However, more positively, the club has drastically reduced the size of its losses, averaging less than £7m in the last four years, compared to £20m in the preceding decade #SAFC
A review of Ipswich Town's finances, as they return to the Premier League after 22 long years away. Focus is on the latest available accounts from 2022/23, but also has comparisons with Championship clubs and some estimates for the top flight #ITFC
Losses have been growing under the new owners, as they invested in the squad and infrastructure in an attempt to return Ipswich to former glories - which has clearly worked #ITFC
Even though they were in League One, 2022/23 was the first time that the club broke through the £20m revenue barrier since the last time that they were in the Premier League back in 2001/02 #ITFC