It's sad to hear both PM Johnson and LotO Starmer colluding with the idea that the answer to problems is longer prison sentences.
Prisons only help when people who are dangerous and cannot otherwise be prevented from harming others are sent there.
1/14
Prison is worse than useless for anything other than keeping us safe from too-dangerous-not-to-be-there people.
Prisons are unhealthy - the risk of Covid-19 in prisons demonstrates this.
2/14
People don't come out of prison reformed or changed for the better. Some come out older (and therefore changed); many come out worse.
People not already addicted get addicted.
3/14
Recidivism rates (people committing more offences) are high.
The "prisons are an expensive way of making bad people worse" adage (ironically coined by a Tory Home Secretary - Douglas Hurd) remains truer than ever.
4/14
This "arms war" of promises of escalating sentences, and the comparison of sentence lengths to suggest that one form of crime is worse than another, is dangerous posturing.
5/14
On @BBCRadio4 this morning, in answer to a question about the bill that passed its second reading this week, the person's reply said that all child murderers should get a life sentence, regardless of whether they murder a boy or a girl.
6/14
Now, ignore the bit about the sex of the victim. Does it make sense for "all child murderers" to get a life sentence? Who murders children and why? Often it will be a drug addicted stepdad or a desperate young mum.
7/14
Are such people so dangerous that other ways of dealing with it wouldn't be more proportionate and effective?
Why are we not asking more questions about the relative value of drug advice; or indeed…
8/14
…or indeed, of the reasons why people become addicted in the first place - a consequence largely of our highly unequal, divided society.
9/14
We've known for decades that prison doesn't work as a deterrent. What works is the belief that you will be caught.
Cuts to the legal system, the courts, etc mean that it takes years for a criminal case to come to court.
10/14
By the time a case comes to court, memories have faded, and witnesses and victims are less motivated.
Justice deferred truly is justice denied.
11/14
Any government - tory or labour - that truly wants to tackle sexual assaults and other crimes -
should stop posturing for the Daily Mail about (useless) harsher sentences and about inventing new laws, but should instead…
12/14
…but should instead ensure that the resources are there to:
*prevent crime in the first place (resources to help people out of poverty and addiction…)
*prosecute and, where appropriate, convict offenders PROMPTLY AND EFFECTIVELY.
And then…
13/14
…And then provide non-custodial disposal for the vast majority, from whom we can be protected with much cheaper, more effective, and humane approaches than prison.
People have been commenting that the protest shouldn't have happened on Saturday, it risked being a superspreader event and was therefore properly banned due to Coronavirus, and therefore the police had no option to ban it.
This is a non-sequitur.
1/
I would have preferred there not to be a large gathering on Clapham Common right now. The number of new cases of Covid-19 is still too high, and opening schools is likely to push this up considerably.
2/
Vaccination is going well, but the groups most likely to spread Covid-19 have largely not been vaccinated so far. (OTOH, there is increasing evidence that vaccination will decrease transmission, when enough people are fully vaccinated.)
3/
My email to my MP (Chris Grayling) about the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill…
1/6
Dear Chris,
I'm sure that, as a former Home Secretary, you will be as concerned as I am about the events of last night.
Of course, the reason why protest is not permitted at present is the Covid-19 regulations, which I broadly support.
2/6
We hope, of course, that within a year or so - possibly even within months - the restrictions necessary for the control of Covid-19 will become a distant memory. However, undue restrictions on protest look like they may continue as a consequence of…
3/6
I was pleased to hear that @theRCN calls for better PPE (specifically, for higher specification masks) were the lead item on the news this morning. This shameful andegregious failure to protect staff will no doubt feature in the eventual public enquiry.
1/8
We, at @TheBMA, have been calling for this for many months now.
There is no "low risk" patient-facing setting. I am horrified whenever I go into a hospital.
2/8
This is me, wearing the sort of mask worn by NHS staff. A "fluid-resistant surgical mask" or FRSM as the guidance calls them. This mask is better-fitting than many I've seen on staff; and I'm wearing it, correctly, properly covering my nose and chin. 3/8
@Fifino9 has managed a couple of improvements, too.
1/9
Attending her GP (family doctor) for her Covid-19 vaccine, the guy in the queue behind her wasn't wearing a mask and was coughing heavily. The volunteer receptionist was wearing a cloth mask.
2/9
Since her letter, they've changed their policies. People with symptoms (even if it's a chronic cough) and those who won't or can't wear a mask are seen separately, away from other patients. And all staff and volunteers wear proper surgical masks.
3/9
The precautionary principle seems unarguable, doesn't it? If it might be risky, don't…
But in practice, people often look at the risk that interests them. Head injuries from cycling. GI infections from streams. Zoonoses from pets or farm animals.
2/7
You can end up with disproportionate and even harmful responses.
Put people off cycling and you reduce all the benefits from cycling and do, overall, more harm.
What we (UK) most urgently need to do is to:
a) Cut transmission globally (to reduce mutation and the arrival of variants that evade the immune system and vaccines)
b) Cut the number of people in the UK who get ill enough to be admitted to hospital…
1/9
c) Cut transmission in the UK, see a) above, and to reduce eg #LongCovid
Vaccines - especially when given first to those most likely to get seriously ill and require hospital admissions - will definitely help with b). They are good at preventing serious illness.
2/9
But we still don't really know how effective vaccines are at preventing transmission. And, with variant viruses which are more transmissible than the variant that we had a year ago, it's not clear that vaccines will ever bring Re below 1 without additional restrictions.
3/9