My email to my MP (Chris Grayling) about the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill…
1/6
Dear Chris,

I'm sure that, as a former Home Secretary, you will be as concerned as I am about the events of last night.

Of course, the reason why protest is not permitted at present is the Covid-19 regulations, which I  broadly support.
2/6
We hope, of course, that within a year or so - possibly even within months - the restrictions necessary for the control of Covid-19 will become a distant memory. However, undue restrictions on protest look like they may continue as a consequence of…
3/6
…as a consequence of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill which I believe will be debated in Parliament tomorrow. Joshua Rozenberg has outlined some of the concerns with the bill.
4/6
I urge you, please - especially following yesterday's disturbances, NOT to pass this bill at this time, but to ensure there is plenty of time to ensure that peaceful protest will remain lawful. It is very concerning that the executive (the Home Secretary) would…
5/6
…(the Home Secretary) would be able to make decisions as to what sort of protest is lawful; a situation one would expect in a totalitarian state, not a liberal democracy.
6/6

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter English #FBPE

Peter English #FBPE Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @petermbenglish

15 Mar
People have been commenting that the protest shouldn't have happened on Saturday, it risked being a superspreader event and was therefore properly banned due to Coronavirus, and therefore the police had no option to ban it.

This is a non-sequitur.
1/
I would have preferred there not to be a large gathering on Clapham Common right now. The number of new cases of Covid-19 is still too high, and opening schools is likely to push this up considerably.
2/
Vaccination is going well, but the groups most likely to spread Covid-19 have largely not been vaccinated so far. (OTOH, there is increasing evidence that vaccination will decrease transmission, when enough people are fully vaccinated.)
3/
Read 17 tweets
7 Mar
I was pleased to hear that @theRCN calls for better PPE (specifically, for higher specification masks) were the lead item on the news this morning. This shameful andegregious failure to protect staff will no doubt feature in the eventual public enquiry.
1/8
We, at @TheBMA, have been calling for this for many months now.

There is no "low risk" patient-facing setting. I am horrified whenever I go into a hospital.
2/8
This is me, wearing the sort of mask worn by NHS staff. A "fluid-resistant surgical mask" or FRSM as the guidance calls them. This mask is better-fitting than many I've seen on staff; and I'm wearing it, correctly, properly covering my nose and chin.
3/8
Read 9 tweets
6 Mar
I'm so glad you managed to get positive changes, @DrJudyStone! Sounds like a dreadful experience for you :-(
twitter.com/DrJudyStone/st…

@Fifino9 has managed a couple of improvements, too.
1/9
Attending her GP (family doctor) for her Covid-19 vaccine, the guy in the queue behind her wasn't wearing a mask and was coughing heavily. The volunteer receptionist was wearing a cloth mask.
2/9
Since her letter, they've changed their policies. People with symptoms (even if it's a chronic cough) and those who won't or can't wear a mask are seen separately, away from other patients. And all staff and volunteers wear proper surgical masks.
3/9
Read 10 tweets
6 Mar
Much of my career, as a Consultant in Communicable Disease Control, has been about risk management.

So I was interested to see this paper on "the precautionary principle".

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11319454/
1/7
The precautionary principle seems unarguable, doesn't it? If it might be risky, don't…

But in practice, people often look at the risk that interests them. Head injuries from cycling. GI infections from streams. Zoonoses from pets or farm animals.
2/7
You can end up with disproportionate and even harmful responses.

Put people off cycling and you reduce all the benefits from cycling and do, overall, more harm.

Ban pets and - well,, there'd be a rebellion.
3/7
Read 7 tweets
5 Feb
Covid-19.

What we (UK) most urgently need to do is to:
a) Cut transmission globally (to reduce mutation and the arrival of variants that evade the immune system and vaccines)
b) Cut the number of people in the UK who get ill enough to be admitted to hospital…
1/9
c) Cut transmission in the UK, see a) above, and to reduce eg #LongCovid

Vaccines - especially when given first to those most likely to get seriously ill and require hospital admissions - will definitely help with b). They are good at preventing serious illness.
2/9
But we still don't really know how effective vaccines are at preventing transmission. And, with variant viruses which are more transmissible than the variant that we had a year ago, it's not clear that vaccines will ever bring Re below 1 without additional restrictions.
3/9
Read 10 tweets
5 Feb
This is a great thread with some useful-for-explaining metaphors on how immunity works and how it can be dysfunctional. It left me wanting to know more about…
… It left me wanting to know more about how an immune system, primed to recognise an antigen, is less susceptible to the "cytokine storm" overreaction which is responsible for severe Covid-19 disease.

I would also like to know more about immunity and #LongCovid.
Incidentally, @Felicea's thread gets (adequately, not perfectly) translated by Google Chrome if you use the threadreaderapp.com version threadreaderapp.com/thread/1357490… - blame Chrome where the meaning isn't entirely clear!
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!