#BombayHighCourt to continue hearing the petition filed by @republic challenging the criminal proceedings initiated against their channel and its employees in the #TRPScam case by the @MumbaiPolice.
Bench led by Justices SS Shinde had in the last hearing recorded Chief Prosecutor’s statement of not taking coercive steps against #Republic channels’ employees. The statement will continue for the next two weeks.
Justice Shinde: Concentrate on clause 12 of chargesheet (which names Republic TV employees as suspects) because your case is confined to it… Suspect.. First you address that, then go on other issues.
Mundargi: Pg 21 says Republic TV - Maalak, chaalak, and sambandhit vyakti. It covered each and everyone, and not necessarily restricted to any particular persons and they were shown as suspects.
Mundargi: The page at the bottom police ensured that anybody connected with Republic can be arrested at any point in time. Then they filed a supplementary chargesheet.
Mundargi: This names Vikas Khanchandani (CEO of ARG Outlier).. The supplementary chargesheet. He is shown as accused.
So far as our employees are concerned kindly see page 1388..
Mundargi: They have named Priya Mukharjee, COO as a suspect. And then there are remand reports of 4 people who are shown as wanted accused. Initially you can say they are suspects, but when they is chargesheet filed, they are shown as wanted accused, but in their case…
Mundargi: Sivasubramanian, CFO of Republic TV is listed as suspect. Shivendru K, Ranjit Walter, employees of ARG Outlier, shown as suspects. They are shown as wanted accused in the remand application of @MumbaiPolice
Mundargi: I will not be able to confine to it. I will just say three statements.
The company can be prosecuted, the principle of alter ego, and thereafter 2G scam case.
Mundargi: If there is material against any individual of the company showing his role, he can be considered as alter ego and he can only be prosecuted for his role and not otherwise.
Mundargi: IF after the other side arguments, the court comes to a conclusion that there is company’s role in this case, then I will make submissions for that too.
Justice Pitale: But the other side is saying there is evidence.
Mundargi submits the principle of legal fiction can be used only when it is available in law, and according to him in IPC, such a principle is not available.
Mundargi states that if there is something against the company, then there are persons who can be held responsible. But conversely if there is an individual who is not involved in that act, then he cannot be held responsible.
Justice Shinde: There is no provision in law where we can restrict their investigation where 6 months outer limit is given, and then we will tell them that stop investigation if nothing is found. Investigation goes on for months and the spirit of law is to be followed.
Mundargi: Forget the other channels, I will only focus on my channel.
You arrested one employee (Ghanshyam Singh), you arrested so many people, you interrogated them, you recorded statements of other persons.
Justice Shinde: But you were granted protection from the beginning.. This what you are seeking is something in the future… From day one, that time itself, it was made clear that they will issue summons.
Mundargi: Therefore my submission was since we are still being shown as suspects, and the investigation is not going any further, as far as we are concerned, the investigation can be quashed.
Mundargi: And if the court finds that the investigation cannot be quashed then a judicial order may be passed to finish the investigation in a reasonable time and then the protection may be extended.
Justice Shinde: We have always maintained that there has to be reasonability and objectivity in the investigation. If someone is suspected, then proceed against him, if not then don’t.
Mundargi points out that the State had been relying on the chats exchanged between BARC CEO Partho Dasgupta and #ArnabGoswami to point out which individuals were involved.
Mundargi: They have been investigating for so long. Whatever and from whichever sources they can get information they could have gotten.. There is no other, new source..
Justice Pitale: When the investigation is going on and an offence has to be committed, then under the jurisdiction of the IO, he can investigate and if in a legal manner, we cannot invetsigate.
Mundargi: At the healm of affairs, we are not saying if tomorrow something happens, we cannot say do not come after us.. Of course, we cannot ask the court for this..
Justice Shinde (to Thakare): Mundargi is not saying stay the investigation, he is saying the IO can continue investigation, but the person, the citizen should know how long will he stay under the threat of suspect.
Justice Shinde (to Thakare): This we are hearing as final hearing, but if you bring clarity on the time of the investigation then our time for this exercise of hearing can be saved.
Mundargi: They are saying that petition is not maintainable because we are not accused, but we will continue to remain suspect, because they feel I am suspect. And why I am suspect is so that they can come and arrest me or my employees at any time.
Mundargi: This chat was between two friends. There is nothing, not one text, or one message, which shows that TRP manipulation was discussed. This is chat between two friends, two close friends.
Mundargi: Beyond that I will not argue. When they start arguing, I will request Milords to direct them to go to the origin of the chat. Some of the chats are taking out of context.
Court asks him to explain the chat which discusses the LCN (Logical Channel Number).
Mundargi: When there is a network and I have been given a number and this is as per the provision of TRAI. This is permanent. They are saying this has been violated by me.
Mundargi: But this discussion between two people, they are implying is a discussion on the TRP manipulation. They cannot say that just because they are friends, they would be helping each other.
Justice Pitale: Since you are not an accused, this entire exercise is a waste of time. Day in and day out we deal with cases of accused. But you are only suspect. They are still investigating, and they may reach a stage where they find you an accused. #ArnabGoswami#MumbaiPolice
Justice Shinde: Since you are neither suspect nor an accused, what relief can we give?
Mundargi: Their actions show that I have been treated as accused.
Justice Shinde: You have to show us whether the witness statements that you have read, and whatever you are pointing out shows that it all pertains to the business of the company..
Mundargi: If this is the position in law, where the law creates a petition that the normal law relating to the vicarious liability would be reversed, then the company commits an offence and the persons in that company are all accused.
Mundargi: And it was considered in judgments, where in IPC, there is no vicarious liability. If I am accused, I have done something for the company, first I will be liable and then the company.
Justice Shinde (to Thakare): How much time will you take you have to instructions. We can understand if there are absconding accused or material from other states are required. But for you the entire material is available right here... We want from every agency some time limit.
Justice Shinde (to Thakare): There may be complicated cases when accused are abroad and you might need to travel... That we all understand... Whatever the IO feels, we are not saying 4-6 weeks..
An advocate mentions a case of bail application for a man who has to get his legs amputated
CJI: Let the doctors examine it. What will family members do here? You are saying he can only be saved if he is released. This we do not agree with. We release him for 15 days
CJI: If he is going to die why don't you release him?
Advocate for state of Maharashtra: According to us he is not going to die
CJI: Having regard to the medical opinion, we are of the view to release the prisoner for 15 days for whatever medical advice he needs. Accused will ensure that he will not visit the place where the underlying dispute is said to exist (Mumbai).
Delhi High Court begins hearing Future's appeal against Single Judge order favouring the enforcement of Emergency Award against its deal with Reliance.
5-judge Constitution bench of Supreme Court will continue hearing the challenge to Maharashtra State Reservation for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes Act which provides educational and employment reservation to #Marathas
Former Mumbai Police Commissioner Parambir Singh writes to @CMOMaharashtra Uddhav Thackrey. Alleges that home minister @AnilDeshmukhNCP to accumulate Rs. 100 Cr. / MONTH.
#ParambirSingh: "I have similarly briefed the Hon’ble Deputy Chief Minister, Maharsahtra, the President of Nationalist Congress Party, Shri Sharad Pawar and other senior Ministers also about the misdeeds and malpractices"
The Karnataka HC begins hearing two petitions moved by Amazon and Flipkart, seeking to quash the probe ordered by the CCI for alleged violations of Competition law.