Delhi High Court begins hearing Future's appeal against Single Judge order favouring the enforcement of Emergency Award against its deal with Reliance.
There's objection on maintainability: Senior Adv Rajiv Nayar for Amazon
This is a fresh appeal: Salve as he reads the Single Judge order.
I'm asking a stay on all these directions: Salve
There's a finding of breach. Theis has gone much beyond .. we were under the impression that the Single Judge would get reasons (for prima facie order): Salve
Supreme court in SLP has directed that all these (NCLT) hearings can go on .. this court's order has not been stayed : Salve
Single judge's order has to be stayed. This directions are under O39R4a : Salve
In the SLP, date is given. We either argue here or there : Salve
There was an Interim order in the special leave petition.. we can't surely argue the matter at both places. We'll seek appropriate directions from the Supreme Court: Subramanium for @amazon
SLP was against the ad interim order pending final order. The court had given Liberty to single judge to pronounce judge.. it is only right that we file an application before the Supreme Court and seek appropriate order: Subramanium
The appeal lies before this court.. my remedy lies in appeal, I've come in appeal : Salve
Further directions have been given. They have to be stayed: Salve
I'll try to persuade the Supreme Court also : Salve
I have an appeal as a right : Salve
If earlier directions were stayed, these also have to be stayed : Salve
If we're arguing maintainability.. then I'll open up the whole matter : Salve
I don't want the Supreme Court to be told that despite the matter being pending, this Court went into it : Salve
It is for him to argue in whatever fashion he wants to : Nayar
Appeal would not lie against an order which is under Arbitration Act: Subramanium
That very issue in some sense is a subject matter if SLP before the Supreme Court: Subramanium
Since matter is presently before Surpreme Court.. the matter is now listed on April 27. We will not do anything which is inconsistent with the Supreme Court order: Subramanium as he says that the Single Judge order would be brought to the Supreme Court
Future is saying that the single judge order be stayed during the pendency of the appeal : Court
Whatever order has bene passed, it is implied that it is subject to Supreme court order. It was an interim order of Supreme court which as on date governs rights of parties: Subramanium
The court extended the stay after Surpreme Court SLP : Salve
I'm before this Court. Either the same order be passed or I'll argue : Salve
I would like the Court to record that Mr Nayar insisted that maintainability be decided: Salve
Senior Adv Iqbal Chagla for Future says it is also a matter of propriety.
This has to be stayed depending on what the Supreme Court decides on April 27: Chagla
Single judge has not even referred to this court's or Supreme Court's order to make such a drastic order : Chagla
It is only right that we await Supreme Court hearing: Subramanium
So we will stay this order : Court
Since matter is before Surpreme Court, until Supreme Court decides.. : Subramanium
Court dictates the order.
Nayar continue to urge Court to hear it.
Court continues to dictate order.
Court records the submissions made by parties.
Court loses audio for a brief period.
They (Amazon) will prefer application before the Supreme Court for enforcement of order : Court
Grounds of maintainability will be raised before Surpreme Court: Court
We hereby stay the single judge order dated March 18, 2021 till next date of hearing: Court
Court issues notice.
Notice returnable on April 30 : Court
The Court may make it clear that until further orders, order of Surpreme Court be complied with : Subramanium
Subramanian urges court to record the Surpreme Court order.
We'll mention the SLP: Court
Nayar reads the February 8 order passed by the Court.
Nayar urges the point of non maintainability of the appeal.
If we're going into it, allow me to argue : Salve
Alright, we'll hear it on the next date of hearing. Till then there will be a stay : Court
Hearing over.
[BREAKING] Delhi High Court stays Single Judge order directing attachment of Future-Biyani properties, imposing 20 lakh costs
An advocate mentions a case of bail application for a man who has to get his legs amputated
CJI: Let the doctors examine it. What will family members do here? You are saying he can only be saved if he is released. This we do not agree with. We release him for 15 days
CJI: If he is going to die why don't you release him?
Advocate for state of Maharashtra: According to us he is not going to die
CJI: Having regard to the medical opinion, we are of the view to release the prisoner for 15 days for whatever medical advice he needs. Accused will ensure that he will not visit the place where the underlying dispute is said to exist (Mumbai).
#BombayHighCourt to continue hearing the petition filed by @republic challenging the criminal proceedings initiated against their channel and its employees in the #TRPScam case by the @MumbaiPolice.
Bench led by Justices SS Shinde had in the last hearing recorded Chief Prosecutor’s statement of not taking coercive steps against #Republic channels’ employees. The statement will continue for the next two weeks.
5-judge Constitution bench of Supreme Court will continue hearing the challenge to Maharashtra State Reservation for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes Act which provides educational and employment reservation to #Marathas
Former Mumbai Police Commissioner Parambir Singh writes to @CMOMaharashtra Uddhav Thackrey. Alleges that home minister @AnilDeshmukhNCP to accumulate Rs. 100 Cr. / MONTH.
#ParambirSingh: "I have similarly briefed the Hon’ble Deputy Chief Minister, Maharsahtra, the President of Nationalist Congress Party, Shri Sharad Pawar and other senior Ministers also about the misdeeds and malpractices"
The Karnataka HC begins hearing two petitions moved by Amazon and Flipkart, seeking to quash the probe ordered by the CCI for alleged violations of Competition law.