Thread by @QOrigins

There's been a BIG development in QAnon-Land in response to @CullenHoback's documentary:

The Patriots Soapbox crew (Coleman Rogers and his wife Christina Urso, aka Radix) today pivoted to claiming that QAnon is a "psyop" run by the Mossad (Radix is more than a bit anti-Semitic).

Both of them have been *huge* promoters of QAnon. Rogers, in particular, was vital to the movement's ability to spread off of 4chan, and is a prominent suspect for either Original Q or, at the very latest, Early 8chan Q.

So... why would they bail on Q now? My contact suggests:

1. Context matters. Radix claims that Rep. Paul Gosar was going to come onto her program, but bailed on it once the media caught wind.

Now that the Eye of Sauron, in the form of actual media attention, is on them, perhaps they're trying to whitewash their image. Or Q-wash it🤷

2. There DOES seem to be an element of trying to say, "Hey, it's not us! We're not Q!" -- and this seems to be in response to the documentary. My source notes:

3. I cannot stress enough how much Radix, in particular, wants to blame The Jews™ for everything. Per my source, she frequently yammers about the "Khazarian Mafia" -- which is a bullshit way of referring to Jews that I'm not gonna explain here; ask for deets if you're curious.

But what's REALLY gonna throw a grenade into The Discourse about this (though I do still have to report it, bc it's both notable and true) is that the source Radix quotes the most -- and most approvingly -- is @River_Advntures' Medium article: blog.usejournal.com/qanon-is-propa…

After an introduction (screenshot 1), Radix quotes *19 grafs* of his article -- an absolutely huge amount of text -- and concludes by saying that, while she doesn't agree with EVERYTHING the author wrote, "everyone" should read it, especially the PsyGroup and Wikistrat parts.

Indeed, Radix appears to have embraced (whether tactically or out of conviction) the core of Morrison's/RiverAdvntures' theory: that an Israeli firm named PsyGroup was a key part of starting QAnon, working with other right-wing figures to do so.

Radix adds to the theory, though.

Specifically, she turns her focus on Israel. Again, this is just how she rolls; I want to be clear that River_Advntures, though he did focus on PsyGroup and discussed it (accurately) as a firm founded by Israelis, did *not* take the same anti-Semitic turn that Radix did.

So!

Radix's additions to Daniel's theory are, in summary:

1. Bibi Netanyahu was involved

2. Bibi bad because Israel bad because Jews bad.

3. Q SAYS they're connected to military intelligence, "but what if it's Israeli military intelligence?"

4. Kushner bad because Jews bad.

So! Why is all this notable? Why have I wasted so much of your precious time on this Earth explaining it?

Because ***this is cross-over between the worldview of Q critics (well, a loud minority of Q critics) and the worldview of QAnon followers.*** That's new & VERY interesting.

BUT there is a caveat: Rogers is a chan-CHUD. Radix, a white supremacist. These are folks who lie all the time, by the very nature of their... avocations, you might say.

And they've built their reputation and following entirely off of QAnon. Are they *really* gonna break up w/Q?

Or is this just a tactical denial to sort of Q-wash themselves until the press stops paying attention and they can slink back to their usual BS?

I don't know. This is, on the surface, a BIG break with QAnon -- but conspiracy theorists aren't known for their consistency.

P.S. Oh right! The source. Beware, the site is cursed (and Twitter was right to block it --you'll have to do a bit of work to get there.)

patriotssoapbox dot com /opinion/on-psychological-influence-ops-in-the-info-age-q-in-the-crosshairs/

P.S. I didn't mention this in the thread, but should have:

Patriots Soapbox has been SO thoroughly deplatformed that the only way they can get paid is if you mail them a paper check.

Revenue has GOT to be in the toilet. So if Q's not working for them, why stay loyal to Q?