#SupremeCourt bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and R. Subhash Reddy to shortly hear plea by Former Mumbai Police Commissioner Para. Bir Singh seeking CBI probe against "corrupt malpractices" by state Home Minister Anil Deshmukh
@AnilDeshmukhNCP
@CPMumbaiPolice
Plea by Singh also challenges the order passed by the State on March 17 transferring Singh from the post of Commissioner, Mumbai Police as being violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution

barandbench.com/amp/story/news…
Hearing begins.

Senior counsel Mukul Rohatgi appears on behalf of Singh.
Two preliminary questions: Why Article 32 petition, why not 226?

Two, the person against the petition is filed is not even impleaded as party: Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul.
The plea to add him as party has been filed. Let me answer question on Art 32: Rohatgi
The entire State is rocked. Police reforms have not taken place: Rohatgi.

That is the case with all States- UP, WB, MP. Not just this State: Justice Kaul.
The parties to this case were hunky dory for a long time. Now they have fallen apart and this has come up. I agree it is serious but High Court can deal with it: Justice Kaul
This is a matter of serious public interest for whole nation. A police officer is transferred citing administrative grounds but Home minister himself said on TV that it is not an administrative transfer: Rohatgi
On much lesser issues, this Court has entertained Art 32 petitions: Rohatgi

#ParambirSinghLetter #AnilDeshmukh
The point is simple. He is making some allegations and Minister is also making some allegations. I don't see a point why you should not move HC. If you give list of cases entertained under 32, I can also give cases we have relegated to HC: Justice Kaul
We do acknowledge matter is serious. But Power of Art 226 is wide: Kaul J.
Rohatgi request that a direction be issued to High Court to take up matter tmrw since there are CCTbV evidence etc involved: Rohatgi
We have no doubt matter is quite serious affecting administration at large. In view of it, liberty to approach High Court granted: Court order
The petitioner says they will file petition in High Court today and would like the matter to be heard tomorrow. That request is to be made before High Court: Supreme Court
Matter over

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

25 Mar
#Breaking Karnataka HC sets aside a First Information report registered against Kangana Ranaut over her tweets comparing farmers protesting against the farm laws to terrorists.

@KanganaTeam

#KanganaRanaut Image
High Court: Petition is allowed, the order is set aside and remitted back to the magistrate for consideration.

Magistrate to consider matter afresh.

@KanganaTeam
High Court: Having taken note of the order passed by the magistrate, nowhere has he made any reference that he has perused averments in the complaint and whether it amounts to a cognizable offence.

@KanganaTeam
Read 6 tweets
25 Mar
Hearing where a Petitioner in person appears:

Justice AM Khanwilkar: You want the investigation to be conducted by a particular officer? This is your constitutional right?

Petitioner: I am placed under him, please

Justice Khanwilkar: What does that expression mean? Image
Justice Khanwilkar: Let this matter be placed before any other bench of which I am not a part of.

Amicus Curiae Sumeer Sodhi and Adv Vivek Tankha stands discharged.

#SupremeCourt
Petition is a matrimonial dispute which also had allegations against sitting judges of the Bombay High Court. The petitioner wanted the case to be referred to a 11 judge bench.
Read 5 tweets
25 Mar
Justices UU Lalit, Indira Banerjee and KM Joseph to hear plea by Gautam Navlakha, accused in the 2018 Bhima Koregaon violence, against the rejection of his plea for default bail by Bombay High Court
#SupremeCourt
#BhimaKoregaon Image
Senior Advocate Nitya Ramakrishnan asks if the matter will be taken up before the part heard matter today
Bench discusses among themselves
Read 8 tweets
25 Mar
A special bench of the Supreme Court Bench headed by CJI SA Bobde to shortly hear a plea filed by an NGO, Lok Prahari, seeking appointment of additional judges to the #SupremeCourt under Article 128 of the Constitution #judgesappointment #topcourtjudges
@rsprasad Image
CJI to MP HC: is it your stand that you will.not reply to ad hoc appointment suggestion since you want regular appointment?

SN Shukla: That is Uttarakhand HC

CJI: who is for Uttarakhand?
CJI repeats the same question to Uttarakhand HC

Adv Vinay Arora: There are four vacancies. We want to fill that first and then look at the backlog.

CJI: is it so that you will consider names of ad hoc appointments and send to #SupremeCourt

Arora: Yes
Read 25 tweets
25 Mar
CJI SA Bobde led bench to hear a plea by Delhi Jal Board against Haryana government seeking a direction to the state to immediately stop the discharge of untreated pollutants into the #Yamuna river and to release sufficient water to Delhi
@DelhiJalBoard
#SupremeCourt Image
Advocate: There is curtailment of water supply to Delhi. 25 percent of drinking water to Delhi will be curtailed from today. Chief Secretary has written to Punjab Haryana. Some repair work has to be carried out in a canal. DJB CEO has inspected and work can happen during monsoon
Adv Gautam Narayan: They have to atleast make an alternate drinking water route be made available

Senior Adv Shyam Divan for Haryana: we have recieved this application today. We need to reply

CJI: urgency is great. We will hear it tomorrow
Read 8 tweets
25 Mar
[Day 9] 5-judge Constitution bench of Supreme Court will continue hearing the challenge to Maharashtra State Reservation for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes Act which provides educational and employment reservation to #Marathas.

#MarathaReservation
#SupremeCourt Image
Advocate Shriram P Pingle makes submissions, he says that he is appearing for the SCBC Welfare Association in an IA.
Read 155 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!