2/Interviews with 41 persons tapered (⬇️>50% ) were open. The framework for assessing stigma allowed that it may include “societal-level conditions, cultural norms, & institutional policies that constrain the opportunities, resources, and wellbeing of the stigmatized”
3/Major finding: "Participants identified themselves as overlooked and negatively impacted by measures implemented during the pharmacovigilance period, including various tapering initiatives"
Yep, I've witnessed that.
4/Major finding: "During the course of pain treatment, dominant cultural norms reinforced the socially devalued status of people living with chronic pain and invalidated their experiences"
Yep, I've witnessed that both institutionally and interpersonally
5/Racial mistreatment was bound up with the major finding on invalidation. Black women in particular felt singled out under the tapering regime. Disbelieved and "drug seeking"
Yep: other studies show tapers target persons of color
6/Major finding: "During and after opioid tapers, institutional policies and programs further marginalized and yielded unintended consequences for people living with chronic pain"
Yep: we've been decrying the unintended consequences since 2016. Some have heard us.
7/ persons going through this feel their survival is being discounted in care that changes their lives, nonconsensually, discounting them on whole
On social media, they are falsely accused of pharma support. One particularly spiteful advocate says suicides are "a hoax"
8/As a clinician/scientist who cares for patients with pain and who has been willing to advocate, I have feared a marginal or stigmatized status from speaking up, even in scientifically defensible ways. Many barbs sent my way have featured caricature, or just anger.
9/But I will say (a) we owe it to our own ethics to take seriously the experience of patients who are undergoing a care change our health systems have imposed
(b) pushback toward me confirmed, for me, that speaking out remains absolutely necessary.
10/No person should be left believing they are simply a liability to health systems, to doctors,nurses & pharmacies.
No person should be left like feeling like "the one with the scarlet letter"
We might have to afix scarlet letters to our own chests until we can work this out
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/I'm excited that Dr. @AjayManhapra is presenting on concerns about mandatory opioid taper for VA's MAT-VA journal club, based on our shared paper... he notes Human costs of mandatory and widespread opioid taper
2/He cites @BethDarnall as the best available study, noting that even when one offers the best support system, a significant % of patients do not have a reduction in pain or pain worsens.
3/In a way that will seem controversial, he proposes that opioid therapy is not exactly an analgesic. This is daily use of an addictive substance that offers relief, where only a minority develop addiction.
1/Nice viewpoint out today: "Balancing the Risks and Benefits of Benzodiazepines" -authors note risks of these drugs and their utility, in light of @US_FDA changing the label to highlight risks jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…
2/FDA's revised warning will more thoroughly cover risks, and the authors endorse that "increased caution regarding benzodiazepine use is warranted; fewer benzodiazepine prescriptions are needed" ... with a careful stipulation...
3/Benzodiazepine risks needed to be highlighted, "However, when considered without an appropriate patient-centered context, this enhanced warning statement might lead to fewer appropriate prescriptions and unintended consequences" - this should echo what happened with opioids
“Why did so many physicians become Nazis?” – this new essay bears on us, the non-Nazi doctors. In short, “science” can be invoked by immoral agents, & science language can seduce us into societal plans that override our duties to individuals @tabletmag /1 tabletmag.com/sections/histo…
Germany was extreme, of course.
Over 50% of doctors joined the Nazi party. There, Jews, gays & disabled persons were designated a disease on the German “body”. Ridding Germany of them was seen as good science.
We need not project the US will follow that, ever /2
But the US & other nations have not been alien to an immoral use of science-based authority.
Germany’s Laws for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring were based on American laws, passed earlier. We should all know about Tuskegee
/3 cdc.gov/tuskegee/timel…
2/Opioid prescribing has ⬇️37% since its peak in 2011. Today, many agencies agree that “deprescribing” was not carried out in ways that consistently protected patients.
We ask “how can well-intended changes to care transpire in ways that are unsafe or harmful?”
3/De-implementation= “reducing or stopping practices that are ineffective, unproven, harmful, overused, or inappropriate”
With opioids, that could be not starting, stopping or reducing.For us, this does *not* reflect a commitment to opioid elimination from care.h/t @VPrasadMDMPH
We are eager to hear the plenary speaker for @US_ASP (the new academic pain org for the US) Dr. Meghani of U.Penn Nursing.. on the "Guideline Epidemic and Pain Care" introduced by @JessicaMerlinMD@DrJohnPereira /1
Key points for Dr. Meghani:
*US fighting its drug war "like other resource poor countries"
*Broad misapplication of the 2016 @CDCgov
opioid guideline
*Seriously undermined care of patients with mod to severe pain
*Obligations of policy makers in scaling high policies /2
Key points made by Dr. Meghani, of U Penn Nursing for @US_ASP
Insurers and states acted rapidly, in 2016-17 after @CDCgov
, to impose hard #opioid dose limits, to require opioid stoppage and taper, all in apparent violation of the Guideline, which had a low evidence GRADE /3