@deandunham

Dean, avid listener to your show on Fridays, but never thought I'd need to write in. Then a blooming insurance claim (sorry not work from home).

As you always say, they're trying to wriggle out!

But the problem is the scam.
We need hot water, and they know it
We claim for a boiler replacement - rejected.
But they're using a bogus renewals argument to reapply an initial no claims period.
That's a first policy first term clause.
Otherwise we're not in contravention, there's no misrepresentation.
We should win

I mentioned a scam...
So while we're dealing with faux claim denial, the dog has become the best smelling member of the household.
Quite seriously - no one wants to live without hot water.
Showers aside it's still blooming cold.

So, dig into savings, buy the boiler now. Collect claim

SCAM time
This policy pays out with vouchers or supplier credits.
If we win our battle ... they pay out in Monopoly money they can't redeem for another 10-15 years, except of course vouchers expire.

It looks to me like they can turn down every claim and just wait on hygiene to run out.
So I've got (I believe) a false claim denial
A forced pre-claim purchase of a boiler
And a post claim inability to refund my purchase.

And I know this is insurance and it's by definition slimy, but that looks like a trail a slug wouldn't want to be associated with
Is there anything Consumer Rights Act can do for us - I know it's a service, but you reminded me that's included and this is definitely SUBSTANDARD.

Or the 2016 amendment to the Enterprise Bill to cover deliberate late payment?
Can we say they were "unreasonable", demand cash?
That's the lot Dean, felt like the sort of fun one you like to get into, so if I can add any more details, let me know.

Thanks as always, PM with with any private questions.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hilary Abernathay. Some #Covid19 & #Nexit for all?

Hilary Abernathay. Some #Covid19 & #Nexit for all? Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @atatimelikethis

25 Mar
I've argued our Government shares more with USSR totalitarian "communists" than with anything in modern Conservatism (attached at end).

From state controls, to spending or resources, anyone can see that.

It begs questions.

Where are the real conservatives?
Are they a threat? Image
Just to recap a little for any new readers, since the start I've argued there was no big mastermind or master plan that led Conservatives to their "masterpiece", Populist #Brexit.

3 simple reasons

1. We saw the factions
2. We watched the seesaw
3. The endless inconsistency Image
In late 2016/2017 we tried to prove this objectively. We used press articles from Brexit, IndyRef, Quebec & Catalonia.

Brexit was unique in three areas:

Policy and terms were decided after referendum
There was no consensus for years
Multiple factions hijacked constantly 🔄🔁 Image
Read 10 tweets
20 Mar
In the dark corners of the nasty end of the large colon of academia, there is a theory.

Fascism will be achieved by...?

The theory argues that "normal" hate monger theorists are wrong. Major pushes create generational counter-reactions that eventually undo them.

So instead?
This may feel like a tangent. It's relevant.

How do you boil a frog?

The answer is NOT to put the frog into boiling water.

It will immediately jump out.

Put the frog in cold water and very slowly heat the water?

The poor frog won't notice until it's too late. Boiled alive
So it is for this fascism theory.

Don't make big changes. People will be alerted and "jump out". You'll end up defeating yourself

Make small changes. Slowly. Changes that alone seem almost minor, not large enough to oppose or reverse

Such as?

How about the right to protest?
Read 5 tweets
18 Mar
Priti's latest dalliance into badly constructed legislation, the

"Statues have feelings too Act"

is notable for all the obvious reasons below.

But I'd like to point out some lesser-known facts.

Since 1851 we've had ~ 30 criminal justice acts (add data crimes etc.)

...cont
Uk average age is 40.1 years.
Of the 30, 23 have been within most lifetimes.

Off the 23, 15 have been introduced by Priti and her ilk. That's 65%.

Take out "genuine modernisation" like data and internet legislation; it's 90%.

Remove money laundering; it's 100% Priti and Pals.
To a good approximation Priti isn't tough on crime so much as tough on wood pulp.

Let's be fair. There is context.
On the one hand she's prioritising statues over women while her PM is investing in Nukes.

On the other hand, all this aggression must be having a result.
Read 5 tweets
17 Mar
Dominic Raaaab.
Unique among foreign secretaries in ignorance and stupidity.

#Raab yesterday, while defending an indefensible bill which hands statue damage a longer sentence than rape...in the NEXT SENTENCE, undermined everything Churchill stood for after the war.

How? Why?
This was Churchill in 1948, after the war talking of what was needed to ensure the evil could never happen again

“In the centre of our movement stands the idea of a Charter of Human Rights, guarded by freedom and sustained by law.”

The European Convention on human rights ECHR
And this is Raab yesterday, straight after he was:
tough on Statue Criminals,
tough on the causes of idle statue damage.

" If we restrict trade to countries with ECHR-level human rights we're not going to do many trade deals with the growth makets of the future. "
Read 8 tweets
15 Mar
For those of you looking for insight as to how the heck the Tories are ahead, it comes down to:

1. Short memories
2. Good spin
3. Ignorance of their crimes.

Explanation follows.

SHORT MEMORIES
Not just in the attached, or in other polls but also in general...recency effect /1
We, humans, are great at recognising what someone did recently and great at forgetting the past. Tories are riding on the back of vaccines (ironically, where they got out of the way and didn't repeat past disasters).

2. Spin.
Vaccines, budget and Brexit, only 1 is good news.
/2
But you wouldn't know it from the press and spin Meister's, and as usual, people are not engaged enough to see the truth.

When you look at this list ⬇️ which isn't even comprehensive, this Mafia of a Government is objectively the worst in history



/3
Read 5 tweets
12 Mar
1/ If we don't resist authoritarianism now, when will we, asks the radio?

Here are 5 times we did & the media were absent, complicit:

1. Conservative manifesto.
2. Covid19 enabling act
3. Legalise bribery act
4. licence to kill act
5. Corporate Manslaughter switch

Sources⏬
2/ 1. Conservative Manifesto
Ironically if anyone should have been screaming about this sordid document, it should have been the libertarian right.
They were silent. Look at the small print.

3/ 2. The Enabling Act
The unbelievable powers written into the original #covid19 emergency powers act

Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!