Dean, avid listener to your show on Fridays, but never thought I'd need to write in. Then a blooming insurance claim (sorry not work from home).
As you always say, they're trying to wriggle out!
But the problem is the scam.
We need hot water, and they know it
We claim for a boiler replacement - rejected.
But they're using a bogus renewals argument to reapply an initial no claims period.
That's a first policy first term clause.
Otherwise we're not in contravention, there's no misrepresentation.
We should win
I mentioned a scam...
So while we're dealing with faux claim denial, the dog has become the best smelling member of the household.
Quite seriously - no one wants to live without hot water.
Showers aside it's still blooming cold.
So, dig into savings, buy the boiler now. Collect claim
SCAM time
This policy pays out with vouchers or supplier credits.
If we win our battle ... they pay out in Monopoly money they can't redeem for another 10-15 years, except of course vouchers expire.
It looks to me like they can turn down every claim and just wait on hygiene to run out.
So I've got (I believe) a false claim denial
A forced pre-claim purchase of a boiler
And a post claim inability to refund my purchase.
And I know this is insurance and it's by definition slimy, but that looks like a trail a slug wouldn't want to be associated with
Is there anything Consumer Rights Act can do for us - I know it's a service, but you reminded me that's included and this is definitely SUBSTANDARD.
Or the 2016 amendment to the Enterprise Bill to cover deliberate late payment?
Can we say they were "unreasonable", demand cash?
That's the lot Dean, felt like the sort of fun one you like to get into, so if I can add any more details, let me know.
Thanks as always, PM with with any private questions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've argued our Government shares more with USSR totalitarian "communists" than with anything in modern Conservatism (attached at end).
From state controls, to spending or resources, anyone can see that.
It begs questions.
Where are the real conservatives?
Are they a threat?
Just to recap a little for any new readers, since the start I've argued there was no big mastermind or master plan that led Conservatives to their "masterpiece", Populist #Brexit.
3 simple reasons
1. We saw the factions 2. We watched the seesaw 3. The endless inconsistency
In late 2016/2017 we tried to prove this objectively. We used press articles from Brexit, IndyRef, Quebec & Catalonia.
Brexit was unique in three areas:
Policy and terms were decided after referendum
There was no consensus for years
Multiple factions hijacked constantly 🔄🔁
Dominic Raaaab.
Unique among foreign secretaries in ignorance and stupidity.
#Raab yesterday, while defending an indefensible bill which hands statue damage a longer sentence than rape...in the NEXT SENTENCE, undermined everything Churchill stood for after the war.
How? Why?
This was Churchill in 1948, after the war talking of what was needed to ensure the evil could never happen again
“In the centre of our movement stands the idea of a Charter of Human Rights, guarded by freedom and sustained by law.”
The European Convention on human rights ECHR
And this is Raab yesterday, straight after he was:
tough on Statue Criminals,
tough on the causes of idle statue damage.
" If we restrict trade to countries with ECHR-level human rights we're not going to do many trade deals with the growth makets of the future. "
We, humans, are great at recognising what someone did recently and great at forgetting the past. Tories are riding on the back of vaccines (ironically, where they got out of the way and didn't repeat past disasters).
2. Spin.
Vaccines, budget and Brexit, only 1 is good news.
/2
But you wouldn't know it from the press and spin Meister's, and as usual, people are not engaged enough to see the truth.
When you look at this list ⬇️ which isn't even comprehensive, this Mafia of a Government is objectively the worst in history
2/ 1. Conservative Manifesto
Ironically if anyone should have been screaming about this sordid document, it should have been the libertarian right.
They were silent. Look at the small print.