1/9 Thread: The agony and ecstasy of concentrated portfolio
JPM recently updated their famous paper on the concentrated portfolios. Just like the earlier two, it is a very humbling read.
Given the pick up in volatility, perhaps the danger of concentration is more intuitive now.
2/9 "more than 40% of all companies that were ever in the Russell 3000 Index experienced a “catastrophic stock price loss”, which we define as a 70% decline in price from peak levels which is not recovered."
3/9 Take a minute to read this. If you have been told "stocks always go up", I have news for you.
It's a very hard endeavor we all still choose to do, for better or worse.
4/9 The returns, of course, do not follow normal distribution. This is why I don't want to waste my time studying companies which are just average.
Easier said than done though; great companies eventually become mediocre or even die all the time. It's a treacherous game.
5/9 Why do companies fail?
"we found that most instances of business failures were largely outside management’s control"
If you find yourself in a difficult industry, you may appear a lot worse than you actually are, and vice versa.
6/9 "At the same time, a measure of market depth has been falling. This latter measure suggests that prices could evaporate should selling pressure suddenly increase for a given stock or sector."
Hmm, kinda rings a bell.
7/9 "the risk is NOT whether the Fed would raise rates to much higher levels; the risk might be whether the Fed would raise them at all. A yield of 3.0%-3.5% on the 10 year Treasury, which would still be low relative to inflation, could create substantial equity market losses."
8/9 While growth investors certainly benefited from low rates in the last few years, let's not forget the broader picture: many "value" stocks did see deep erosion of fundamentals.
9/9 Some more examples of failure/sufferings of old economy stocks here.
Knowing about behavioral biases and knowing *your* biases are very different. Most investors have this implicit assumption that behavioral biases are other people’s problems, and they are somewhat immune from this “disease”.
2/9 Nobody really claims this since it’s not believable, but many carry this implicit assumption.
While discussing with @LibertyRPF recently, we both conceded that we act very differently to a company and its shortcomings depending on whether we own the stock.
3/9 He mentioned how his views on Facebook’s shenanigans had a high correlation to whether he actually owned the stock.
Looking at how many smart people absolutely lambaste Facebook, I have often wondered the same.
Capital allocation is one of the defining determinants of our personal wealth. Two people with similar current wealth but very different capital allocation skillset/priorities will have vastly different wealth in the long run.
2/9 I see a lot of people who want to be rich as fast as possible. Of course, there is hardly any get rich quick scheme, but let’s consider the possibility we do win some “lottery”.
What happens afterwards?
3/9 Unless we know how to deploy our winnings, we probably won’t remain rich for too long. We obviously cannot expect to win too many "lotteries".
Unfortunately, schools are terrible at teaching it, and even if they did, perhaps most of us would not “learn” it anyway.
One of the challenges I feel is to figure out what I believe on investing in my veins i.e. to what extent my portfolio is basically just the product of what has worked in the last few years vs what my investing philosophy truly is.
2/7 Once you read a few investing books and/or work in the investment management industry, you have a decent idea what people want to hear.
Yes, the Overton window can evolve in terms of what is acceptable or what people want to hear, but we rarely push the window.
3/7 I suspect most young investors, including me (in early 30s), who basically never experienced any sustained recession cultivate an investing philosophy that is derived from mimetic desire and involves a lot of self-deception.
1/ Read the image attached here. It's about how Costco was consistently criticized by Wall Street analysts 15 years ago because they took "too much care" of the employees.
2/ So what happened in the last 15 years? Costco was one of the few retailers in America that wasn't beaten to death in the age of Amazon.
It was almost 15x in the last 15 years.
3/ While capitalism does create tension among different stakeholders (shareholders, customers, employees, regulators etc), in many cases what is good for broader stakeholders is usually good for shareholders too.
1/ Six months ago, I launched MBI Deep Dives. I publish one deep dive of a publicly listed company every month for $10/month or $100/yr.
Subscribers receive only one/two email each month, and each deep dive is ~8-10k worded piece.
Here's how it went. A thread.
2/ After 6 months, I have 589 paid subs. Although I started in September last year, I started monetizing from November 15, 2020.
I am glad with how things have gone so far, but of course, what happens after 60 months is much more important than 6 months.
3/ I will be the first to admit that MBI Deep Dives has been greatly benefited by the bull market.
I have no clue what will happen to stock price in 3-6 months, but price action probably played a role in convincing at least some to subscribe to my work.
"we roughly achieved our 2023 aspirations in 2020"
Etsy grew 2.5x as fast as e-commerce, and it is now 4th largest e-commerce site by monthly visit.
3/ Etsy is not just an US story now; the pace of international growth and domestic GMS in those markets highlight not only cross-border network effects in play, but also Etsy itself has become a potent international brand.