2 modern ideologies: cybernetics & game theory, i.e. macroeconomics and microeconomics, unseeing each other.
Keynesian cybernetics systematically extends credit to too-big-to-fail, causing secular increase in relative frequency of Moral Mazes.
Classical economics takes a nation's perspective & tries to increase its wealth. Neoclassical game-theoretic ideas like Pareto improvement assume a nation is made of agents in conflict. RBC theory specifically unsees cybernetics.
Simple example of Keynesian effect: Corporate drugstores with cheap access to capital price out or buy out independent pharmacies. This is the underlying situation in 13 Reasons Why. 6 Feet Under is about the same sort of thing, overtly recognizes the new order as Fascist.
In old order a pharmacist needs to be able to keep accounts like a microeconomic agent. In new order, they need to be able to pass the Asch & Milgram obedience tests like a good employee.
Hayek's price signals coordinate actions between independent rational agents without the need for expensive explicit reconciliation of beliefs and interests across agents, allocating more credit to agents better at satisfying each other's preferences.
This is similar to cybernetics as a reduction to coordinate behavior across nodes, but promotes very different agents than Keynesianism does.
@HiFromMichaelV@wolftivy N is a white woman who's worked for 10+ years in credit unions, currently working on a project to expand access to credit for formerly incarcerated people.
@HiFromMichaelV@wolftivy In our first conversation, I pointed out the difference between credit scores as self-fulfilling prophecies about people's ability to roll over their debts based on future access to credit, and underwriting loans based on fundamentals.
@HiFromMichaelV@wolftivy (Her plan involved making special exceptions to the former but not doing anything about the structural features of the system that create privilege classes, and I wanted to point out that the bigger, more profitable, and more systemic-change-oriented opportunity is the latter.)
Empirically incentives are cancelled in America. Aside from ritualized transactions, offering payment or other inducements makes people run away. I personally know two exceptions but I'm exceptionally well connected.
"Sex work is real work" is about bringing sex workers into the professional class with recognized ritualized transactions and an intelligible generally accepted social role. It's coordination against trade, immigrant entrepreneurs, and migrant farm workers.
People in the kinds of privilege classes I know how to get cozy with now approve of sex workers, their eyes light up when I suggested running sex workers for city council, but I don't think that would have happened if I'd suggested other gray-market entrepreneurs.
@AgnesCallard I think this whole thing is quite relevant to your New York Times piece. The same elements keep showing up in multiple contexts: silencing through medicalization and making things strictly about personal feelings to avoid investigating what happened.
Thankful for my first full day in my new home in NYC. So far, having 2 friends as flatmates seems simply good. I seem to have purged some neuroses about how things Should Be In A Place & some Containment fragments that were causing introversion.
@reasonisfun@DavidDeutschOxf@CurziRose@metaLulie I think this is being viewed from an angle that's causing debate behavior and a more fruitful behavior would be to rotate it to an angle that causes analysis behavior instead.
@reasonisfun@DavidDeutschOxf@CurziRose@metaLulie "There is nothing wrong with you" is a helpful but false statement from within a frame that reifies personal wrongness. But we can just decompose personal wrongness into its components!
@reasonisfun@DavidDeutschOxf@CurziRose@metaLulie There's approval and disapproval. There's error and disease. There's a particular parasitic behavior complex that involves reifiying disapproval as something like a permanent blemish and conflating that with error.
The plot of Miracle on 34th Street is wild. Santa Claus is the rightful king, speaking Dutch is a magic power, Quaker-level honesty gets you institutionalized, and the US Postal System is the legitimate judiciary. Sounds true.
USPS as Judiciary is plausible. They have to know what's going on materially. The Army has to know this stuff but only in wartime, the Courts are under NO similar performance pressure.
Also as the movie points out lower-court judges are often elected & therefore posturing. USPS is more disinterested.