“If SARS-CoV-2 came from a lab, the result would likely be a global crackdown on all high-risk biosafety labs, says Chan.” qz.com/1986084/why-do…
Journalists need to do due diligence. When you interview a scientist, have you checked whether they could stand to lose $millions, possibly even the ability to retain employees if it were determined that COVID-19 emerged due to research activities?
There's a common perception that scientists are somehow anointed saints and have no conflicts of interest that could lead them to temptation.
Getting your PhD doesn't free you from the temptations of mankind.
In fact, I invite journalists to attend any pre-covid or hopefully-post-pandemic poster session so you can witness the susceptibility of scientific trainees and even some professors to free food.
I knew one senior scientist who would sneak into the meetings of OTHER labs to eat their food before their meeting started.
I'll give you a hand. When you interview a scientist, ask them 2 questions.
1. Have they recently (past 5 years) co-authored papers with scientists who hunt for viruses in the wild?
2. Have they recently (past 5 years) received or approved $ to hunt viruses?
Tell the experts you interview that you will publish their statements on these 2 questions before you write about what they told you on the topic of COVID-19 origins.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’m hoping that most of the discussion going forward will be about how we can mitigate the risk of lab pathogen pandemics and quickly trace the origins of future outbreaks.
As opposed to “look at all the racists and conspiracists who said covid-19 came from a lab.”
If scientists & science communicators don’t fulfil this essential role of explaining how pandemics can emerge from various types of research activities, it’s a guarantee that less informed people will.
You can’t not do the work and then complain less qualified people did it.
I kind of expected this day to come, but still surprised that it actually arrived.
I'm going to do a quick FAQ🧵 for the public (both scientists & non-scientists) who are just hearing about the possibility of COVID-19 / SARS-CoV-2 having emerged from lab or research activities.
Is it racist to ask whether COVID-19 emerged from a lab or from the wildlife trade in China? No.
Have racist people asked the question above? Yes.
More importantly, will people call you a racist if you ask whether COVID-19 emerged from a lab or from the wildlife trade in China?
Unfortunately, yes, it is quite likely they will call you a racist and more.
And yes, even if you're Asian, you could be called a race traitor.
Sincere thanks to @jbloom_lab who has taken a lot of heat recently for raising the lab leak hypothesis and for defending me, a “conspiracy peddler” according to some scientists.
Also many thanks to @canardbruno and @DecrolyE who have been publicly discussing the lab leak hypothesis and were among the first to point out the unique furin cleavage site and why it is concerning that it was missed in the WIV’s first papers on COVID-19.
Going to do a serious thread on the new TWIV episode released today because it raises so many commonly held opinions on why #laborigins#labescape of COVID-19 was (extremely) unlikely.
I'm very, very glad that TWIV gets the obvious strawman out of the way immediately.
Very few experts - I can't think of any off the top of my head - are claiming that SARS2 was completely, magically designed from no similar virus in nature.