The Anglosphere’s entire 300-year model [capitalism + imperialism] is breaking. #SundayThoughts ☕️ Image
2. First, we need an objective review of history. It started with the British—navel based war, colonizing, and “forcing markets open.” Uhh, “free trade,” over the barrel of a white person’s gun.
3. After the British Empire, their model migrated to the United States—today it’s the U.S. military occupying 150 countries, media propaganda to infiltrating societies, forced democracy, USD hegemony, sanctions, and by these means the achievement of globally controlled markets.
4. The “free market” has always been about Anglo control; it’s their market [most people in the Anglosphere won’t acknowledge this because they are beneficiaries, which is why I say we need to be objective if we want to see what’s actually happening here].
5. Now the world is changing, again. The Anglos no longer wield totalitarian market control. Why? Because now there’s one big sovereign player [China], and all attempts to control it have failed. Even the 100-year century of humiliation, ultimately failed.
6. Now each time the Algos try imperialism/racism to benefit capitalism/corporatism, as they have successfully for hundreds of years, the latter is made to pay a price for the former (see NBA, H&M/Nike). This is a big change, and difficult for them to psychologically deal with.
7. But this existential crisis, for them, is really just free markets returning. A corporation can’t simultaneously support terrorism in a country, spread racist propaganda, and also get big bucks from that country’s consumers. There is an “invisible hand,” which guides players.
8. People complaining about “China controlling us” are actually just complaining about true free markets returning, and the natural breakup of the Anglo-monopoly. It’s not a bad thing, unless you’re an Anglo-supremacist maniac or related opportunist.
9. Strategically, it’s hard to see ways out of this. The Anglosphere can either 1) allow true free markets, or 2) attempt to reestablish global totalitarian control over them.

They are still dangerously pursuing for the second path. (9/9) #Imperialism #Capitalism

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sol 太阳 쏠

Sol 太阳 쏠 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Solzi_Sez

10 Mar
British academic David Harvey lists typical explanations for capitalism’s crisis:

1. just human nature; greed
2. anglo-cultural origins
3. based on false theory; neoliberalism
4. institutional failure requires reconfiguration
5. failure of govt policy
2. He claims these all have truth. Partly human nature, certain parts are nurtured by American/British cultural roots, it features a central theory which is flawed, and it’s now seeing widespread institutional failures with a lack of policy response.
3. He then offers his British Marxist perspective—it’s a problem of capital accumulation, and resultant excess power of finance capital which crowds out labor and other interests. He concludes we have to first admit this system “is crap,” then change our “mode of thinking.”
Read 9 tweets
12 Feb
The S&P500 and CPC are both “superintelligences,” but quite different in their goal seek.

Let’s study the world’s two largest systems in terms of how they aggregate, and direct the efforts of, hundreds of millions of humans into their state-corporate systems.
2. First, what’s a superintelligence? “A superintelligence is a hypothetical agent that possesses intelligence far surpassing that of the most gifted human minds”—Wikipedia. But contrary to this definition, not hypothetical...
3. S&P500: The modern corporation is a legal entity which arranges humans in a hierarchical structure, for the pursuit of a narrow mathematical algorithm—maximize short-term investor return. Google for example, has 135K workers all focused on this goal.
Read 15 tweets
10 Feb
Western “defending myself” gun people can’t comprehend societies that 1) don’t have guns, 2) have impenetrable gated towers with CCTV and steels door, 3) are filled with civilized Confucian people; rarely a murder.

I can’t even *imagine* his scenario...
How would anyone break into my residence? It’s essentially impossible.

And if they did, how would they get out with my stuff, with CCTV watching?

And if I were there, why would I need to do/say anything? They would just see someone is there and run away.

Different worlds.
Now he switches to “but Tiananmen Square!!” 😂
Read 4 tweets
14 Dec 20
This is it—the core social problem of the Anglosphere this century—there is a deep cultural attitude in the colonies, who still see themselves as superior rulers of the world.
Other civilizations don’t exist, in the mind of the West. Or at least they shouldn’t exist.

All the convoluted reasons given by them for why they hate China, are really just rage that a different civilization still exists.

Yes, the bigotry goes that deep. /2
Check the actual definition of this word, which Westerners often use incorrectly (“racist”). This is the West, in a word...

BIGOTED: having or revealing an obstinate belief in the *superiority* of one’s own opinions and prejudiced *intolerance* of the opinions of others. /3
Read 5 tweets
13 Dec 20
POST-TRUTH ERA—WHY WEST, NOT EAST?

Q: How is it that America finds itself ripped apart by postmodernism (i.e. subjectivism / post-truth era), yet East Asia remains sanely grounded in reality?

Cc: @SRCHicks @ConceptualJames @jordanbpeterson @BryanVanNorden @StatesWarring
Background: public intellectuals in the West have been addressing postmodernism (Stephen Hicks, Jordan Peterson, James Lindsay, etc), yet they find themselves going over the same tired old philosophic ground and not really getting to root cause. /2
Apparently it hasn’t yet occurred to them that Western thinking might not be able to solve this Western problem, if it was that thinking itself which created the problem. 💡/3
Read 12 tweets
1 Dec 20
The #Anglosphere, in the 21st century.

It all goes back to the British Empire. It set up colonies, it set global markets rules, and it assumed itself king of this system forever. But...

...now Anglo exceptionalism faces an existential crisis.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglosphe… Image
Think about it, the UK set up these colonies. But any colony in Asia (e.g. Australia) is dependent on Asia, period.

There's no way around geography. Australia is in China's orbit. But how can the white-culture superiority complex ever psychologically deal with dependency? /2
Think about it some more, the US set up this financial & trade system. But whatever country becomes the biggest economy, all other countries are dependent on it.

But how can the while-culture superiority complex deal with a yellow-culture taking over THEIR "free market"? /3
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!