The Anglosphere’s entire 300-year model [capitalism + imperialism] is breaking. #SundayThoughts ☕️
2. First, we need an objective review of history. It started with the British—navel based war, colonizing, and “forcing markets open.” Uhh, “free trade,” over the barrel of a white person’s gun.
3. After the British Empire, their model migrated to the United States—today it’s the U.S. military occupying 150 countries, media propaganda to infiltrating societies, forced democracy, USD hegemony, sanctions, and by these means the achievement of globally controlled markets.
4. The “free market” has always been about Anglo control; it’s their market [most people in the Anglosphere won’t acknowledge this because they are beneficiaries, which is why I say we need to be objective if we want to see what’s actually happening here].
5. Now the world is changing, again. The Anglos no longer wield totalitarian market control. Why? Because now there’s one big sovereign player [China], and all attempts to control it have failed. Even the 100-year century of humiliation, ultimately failed.
6. Now each time the Algos try imperialism/racism to benefit capitalism/corporatism, as they have successfully for hundreds of years, the latter is made to pay a price for the former (see NBA, H&M/Nike). This is a big change, and difficult for them to psychologically deal with.
7. But this existential crisis, for them, is really just free markets returning. A corporation can’t simultaneously support terrorism in a country, spread racist propaganda, and also get big bucks from that country’s consumers. There is an “invisible hand,” which guides players.
8. People complaining about “China controlling us” are actually just complaining about true free markets returning, and the natural breakup of the Anglo-monopoly. It’s not a bad thing, unless you’re an Anglo-supremacist maniac or related opportunist.
9. Strategically, it’s hard to see ways out of this. The Anglosphere can either 1) allow true free markets, or 2) attempt to reestablish global totalitarian control over them.
British academic David Harvey lists typical explanations for capitalism’s crisis:
1. just human nature; greed 2. anglo-cultural origins 3. based on false theory; neoliberalism 4. institutional failure requires reconfiguration 5. failure of govt policy
2. He claims these all have truth. Partly human nature, certain parts are nurtured by American/British cultural roots, it features a central theory which is flawed, and it’s now seeing widespread institutional failures with a lack of policy response.
3. He then offers his British Marxist perspective—it’s a problem of capital accumulation, and resultant excess power of finance capital which crowds out labor and other interests. He concludes we have to first admit this system “is crap,” then change our “mode of thinking.”
The S&P500 and CPC are both “superintelligences,” but quite different in their goal seek.
Let’s study the world’s two largest systems in terms of how they aggregate, and direct the efforts of, hundreds of millions of humans into their state-corporate systems.
2. First, what’s a superintelligence? “A superintelligence is a hypothetical agent that possesses intelligence far surpassing that of the most gifted human minds”—Wikipedia. But contrary to this definition, not hypothetical...
3. S&P500: The modern corporation is a legal entity which arranges humans in a hierarchical structure, for the pursuit of a narrow mathematical algorithm—maximize short-term investor return. Google for example, has 135K workers all focused on this goal.
Western “defending myself” gun people can’t comprehend societies that 1) don’t have guns, 2) have impenetrable gated towers with CCTV and steels door, 3) are filled with civilized Confucian people; rarely a murder.
This is it—the core social problem of the Anglosphere this century—there is a deep cultural attitude in the colonies, who still see themselves as superior rulers of the world.
Q: How is it that America finds itself ripped apart by postmodernism (i.e. subjectivism / post-truth era), yet East Asia remains sanely grounded in reality?
Background: public intellectuals in the West have been addressing postmodernism (Stephen Hicks, Jordan Peterson, James Lindsay, etc), yet they find themselves going over the same tired old philosophic ground and not really getting to root cause. /2
Apparently it hasn’t yet occurred to them that Western thinking might not be able to solve this Western problem, if it was that thinking itself which created the problem. 💡/3
Think about it, the UK set up these colonies. But any colony in Asia (e.g. Australia) is dependent on Asia, period.
There's no way around geography. Australia is in China's orbit. But how can the white-culture superiority complex ever psychologically deal with dependency? /2
Think about it some more, the US set up this financial & trade system. But whatever country becomes the biggest economy, all other countries are dependent on it.
But how can the while-culture superiority complex deal with a yellow-culture taking over THEIR "free market"? /3