Under current FL law, you can't hand voters *anything* within 100 ft. of a polling station. But you can give them brochures, water, and paella (this is a thing in Miami) outside of that.
These laws exist to protect voters from harassment while they're waiting in line to vote.
This is a picture of a popular Miami voting site. In practical terms, it means that campaign workers can't go beyond the cross-walk. But they can hand you water and snacks before that.
This is a Miami voting site where I've volunteered.
Florida law doesn't allow campaign workers to go beyond that white car and chase voters into the station.
That's not an issue because you can hand them water on the way in from the parking lot. This is a fake controversy.
Of course, an obvious point is that the voting sites themselves can provide water for people waiting in line.
The current law just prevents campaign volunteers from walking up to voters while they're waiting in line within 100 feet from a voting site.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2) Parler let people like Lin Wood use their platform to demand VP Pence’s execution.
Private companies refusing to do business w #2 is not an “attack on conservatives.” That’s not conservatism. It’s criminality.
Here’s what’s really frustrating:
The country actually needs a sensible conservative alternative to the insanity of “Awoman” progressivism that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris will try to impose.
Republicans are bleeding support in the suburbs.
I say this with kindness: Twitter is not real life. Your average suburban voter has (1) no idea what’s happening here and (2) is probably not unsympathetic to Apple’s stance here.
While I agree that broadcasters should be more responsible in their programming, the outrage over disinformation in Spanish media is selective, at best. I don't see any calls for "accountability" when Univision Network acts as the DNC's de facto stenographer.
The bad reporting and bias at Univision (by some in its national desk; the local affiliates are generally more professional) shouldn't be overlooked merely because they're more elegant about it or flatter liberal political biases.
Let's be absolutely clear: The people pushing these narratives about "Spanish disinformation" are censorious, left-wing political operatives who are unsatisfied with their current control over the vast majority of Spanish media. They insist on total and absolute hegemony.
I'm glad @EsotericCD raised this question. A good starting point for this discussion is to erase preconceived notions of Hispanics's views on immigration policy.
Below are the results of the majority-Latino border counties in CA, AZ, NM, and TX that I shared earlier.
Hispanics are perfectly capable of having nuanced views on complex policy issues.
Are Latinos supportive of Dreamers and immigration? Yes....but we also want strong borders!
Many Dems and the media, including networks like Univision, treat the latter as anti-immigrant.
But the election results show that many Hispanics actually want strong borders.
There's a disconnect.
It's easy to be dismissive of a border wall from the comfort of a TV studio in Miami, but to people in places like Hidalgo, it's a way to protect their families and livelihood.
The best research on the impact of advertising on elections comes from Kellogg.
In major races where candidates enjoy similar name recognition, you need to significantly outspend your opponent just to move the vote by 0.5%. kellogg.northwestern.edu/faculty/spenku…
Mind you: The Kellogg researchers studied the impact of TV ads, which usually last 30 seconds, involve compelling visuals, present arguments that have been tested, and are well-produced.