@MFA_China And since China is so transparent, could it actually release the WHO investigation report of the very bad SARS leaks at the top Chinese P3 (Beijing) in 2003?
Funny enough, it was never made public!
That's transparency with Chinese characteristics.
@MFA_China Is it because it exposed crass incompetence and incredible bad practices, such as a SARS sample fridge moved into the corridor outside of the lab, without forgetting an attempted cover-up?
@MFA_China Or maybe you could tell us how China was moving (disappearing) about a 100 patients out of hospitals to hotel rooms, or just driving them in ambulances, when the WHO was investigating the SARS outbreak in Beijing in 2003?
2/ That case of the 16th was not even shown correctly on the WHO map and very close to the terminus of bus line that goes past the WIV (Zhengdian site).
3/ The ‘market’ mentioned by the WHO in relation to that case was a foreign-owned modern supermarket like Walmart or Tesco.
When a WHO scientist on a coronavirus origins probe announced in February that the idea that the virus leaked from a lab was “extremely unlikely” and unworthy of further investigation, senior WHO staff in Geneva were shocked. “We fell off our chairs”
.. when the probe’s findings were released in a report in March, it repeated that the lab scenario was “extremely unlikely.” Afterward [--] the WHO director general told China’s envoy in Geneva that he would tell the truth about the report “even if China did not like it.”
Ouch!
The book from which this is extracted will be released on the 24th Aug, but has already been reviewed (by Susan Rice, former US National Security Advisor, Ambassador William J. Burns, Ambassador Samantha Power, etc).
This happened on the month he named for himself, following in the immediate steps of his predecessor, Julius Caesar, who as first Roman dictator (however he may have tried to present it) had no problem being immortalised in ‘July’.
Only problem for Augustus was that the month after July had only 30 days and since July had 31, it would have not looked good.
Problem quickly solved by removing one day from February, the boring cold month at the end of the year, and transferring it to the newly minted August.
Until 48 hours before we finished the whole mission, we still had no agreement that we would talk about the laboratory part of the report, so it was right up to the end that it was discussed whether it should be included or not, says Peter Embarek.
We did not get to look at laboratory books or documents directly from the laboratory. We got a presentation, and then we talked about and asked the questions we wanted to ask, but we did not get to look at any documentation at all, says Peter Embarek.