THREAD: As news rolls out about the next round of economic recovery measures—here’s a plea for the Biden team not to forget a critical program for low-income seniors & disabled people that’s been left to wither on the vine for decades:
Supplemental Security Income, aka SSI.
Nearly 8 million low-income seniors and people with disabilities rely on SSI for subsistence income.
The income support SSI provides is critical—but benefits are so meager, they consign people to abject poverty.
The max SSI benefit for 2021 is $794/mo, about $26 a day.
2/
Putting SSI's sub-poverty benefit levels in context:
They’re not enough to afford rent in any state in the U.S.—even spending 100% of your monthly benefit on rent.
Average rent for a 1-bedroom apartment: $1,063/mo—128% of an SSI recipient’s monthly income.
3/
Meanwhile, under current law, SSI beneficiaries are legally prohibited from having even modest emergency savings.
The program’s outdated and absurdly low asset limits have been stuck at $2,000 for an individual/$3,000 for a couple for more than THREE DECADES—since 1989.
4/
Setting aside how counterproductive asset limits are to economic security… if SSI's asset limits had at least been updated for inflation over the years, they’d be $9,500 for an individual and $12,675 for a couple today.
5/
Here are the (long-overdue) SSI improvements President Biden promised to make—at least some, if not all of which, need to be in the mix for the next round of economic recovery:
1: Increase the sub-poverty level SSI federal benefit rate to 100% FPL and index it to inflation
6/
2: Raise SSI’s absurdly low asset limits (at least to update them for inflation)
3: Eliminate SSI’s marriage penalty—so marriage equality finally extends to disabled people
7/
4: Eliminate SSI’s archaic and mean-spirited “in-kind support and maintenance” rule—which slashes already-inadequate benefits by *one-third* for folks who get even a little help (even a bag of food!) from friends or family so they can make it through the month.
8/
BONUS: All of this can be done through reconciliation—i.e. without any Republican votes.
(While Title II of the Social Security Act can’t be changed in reconciliation under the Byrd Rule, Title XVI, which authorizes SSI, can.)
9/
SSI beneficiaries are by definition some of the lowest-income, most economically vulnerable seniors and disabled people in the U.S.
It’s downright shameful how long they’ve been deprioritized and forgotten by federal policymakers.
This thread wasn’t meant to be exhaustive, but 💯 another urgently needed reform that warrants lifting up is updating SSI’s archaic earned/unearned income disregards which have hugely lost value, frozen at $65 & $20/mo respectively *since the ‘70s*
THREAD: Grim new data from the @SocialSecurity Administration show a *huge* drop in low-income elderly & disabled folks able to access SSI during the pandemic. Field office closures are clearly part of this, but there are deeper problems too. Let’s unpack. npr.org/2021/02/19/969…
First, the data: January 2021 marked the lowest number of new SSI awards per capita in the program’s history. (The 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th lowest months were also during the pandemic, so this has been a steady and worsening trend.) 2/
This is troubling on many levels. SSI provides critical if meager income support to the very poorest seniors & people with disabilities. It also provides access to Medicaid. One would hope to see *rising* numbers of people helped given the dramatic increase in need. 3/
Getting these rules withdrawn is a *HUGE* win for the #HandsOffSNAP community, who submitted an avalanche of public comments underscoring how the cruelty, once again, was the point.
so hey, remember how the Trump admin was trying to strip hundreds of thousands of disabled people of #SocialSecurity, to “save” $2.6 billion in disability benefits, via a backdoor administrative action?
BREAKING: @AGKarlRacine, @NewYorkStateAG & a coalition of 22 Attorneys General have sent a 🔥 letter calling on Trump & Ag. @SecretarySonny Perdue to immediately suspend a rulemaking that could slash Food Stamps for 3.1 million people amid #COVIDー19 if allowed to take effect.
Refresher on what the rule would do, as well as the politics (like how this is another instance of Trump slashing critical programs by fiat when he doesn’t get his way in Congress)
“It’s a sh-- sandwich, and it was designed that way by @SenRickScott.”
Per an adviser to FL @GovRonDeSantis, Florida's UI system was deliberately designed to “make it harder for people to get benefits so the numbers were low to give the governor something to brag about.”
/2
in light of the news that the Trump admin has FINALLY hit pause on taking Food Stamps away from 700,000 jobless workers in the middle of the #COVID19 pandemic... i put together a short history of the past month’s events, to put this in full ugly context:
(thread)
MARCH 12: Trump's USDA confirms it has considered whether to suspend its Food Stamp cuts due to #COVID19 19—and has decided to let them take effect April 1.
MARCH 14: A federal judge issues a temporary injunction blocking Trump’s Food Stamp cuts from taking effect, noting the immense cruelty of stripping jobless workers of food amid the global #COVID19 pandemic: