Why and how do people join violent extremist organizations? And how do they become deradicalized?

To find out, we conducted interviews with former extremists and their families and friends.

Here are 10 key takeaways... [thread] bit.ly/3wlkCXK
The attack on the Capitol and other recent events emphasize the need for more research to inform prevention and deradicalization strategies.

These interviews illustrate how 24 white supremacists and 8 Islamic extremists became radicalized—and how some left these groups.
1️⃣Negative life events are part of radicalization, but they’re not the sole cause.

Abuse/trauma, family problems, and bullying often have psychological/behavioral consequences and are sometimes implicated in radicalization pathways. But they're not the most direct cause.
2️⃣Those with mental health challenges often had difficulty accessing care.

Not every respondent spoke of mental health problems, but those who did mentioned a lack of treatment options that were accessible or affordable.
3️⃣The enduring appeal of extremist groups seems to lie in attending to fundamental human needs.

Important needs––for social bonds, for love/acceptance, to have a purpose in life––go unmet for some people. This can leave them prone to become involved with extremist views/groups.
4️⃣Radical ideology and involvement in extremist activities have addictive properties for many.

Physical violence and engaging in extremist activity online have addictive properties that appear linked to the experience of joint risk and struggle against a common enemy.
5️⃣Recruitment to radical groups deliberately leverages psychological vulnerabilities.

Groups restrict access to information or circumstances that challenge ideological constructs and use social/cognitive strategies for reinforcing in-group bias and hatred toward outsiders.
6️⃣Extremist groups nurture a self-reinforcing social milieu.

This includes shared purpose, camaraderie, friendship, and joint activities, all of which can involve both risk and emotional rewards.
7️⃣Both radicalization and deradicalization are linked to being in the right place at the right time.

An individual's experience of a dramatic life event and of highly meaningful social interactions (negative and positive) play fundamental roles in both processes.
8️⃣Heavy-handed attempts by formal institutions to deradicalize individuals often fail.

Such measures taken by intelligence and law enforcement agencies can sometimes deepen ongoing radicalization processes and push potentially salvageable cases to more-extreme behaviors.
9️⃣Stigmatization of groups seems mostly to push at-risk individuals further down the extremist path.

Punitive measures, banned speech, and indignant public discourse can backfire and increase the drive for radicalization.
🔟Media literacy, access to diverse sources of information, and positive experiences with diversity appear critical for deradicalization.

Structured, opportunistic interventions that involve exposure to people outside the group who exhibit kindness/generosity may be effective.
Check out the full report, including recommendations for preventing radicalization and promoting deradicalization, here. ⤵️ bit.ly/3wlkCXK

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with RAND Corporation

RAND Corporation Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RANDCorporation

8 Dec 20
We're living in an era of #TruthDecay: Americans increasingly disagree about basic facts. This can have dire consequences.

Civic education is key to reversing the course. Our new report identifies ways to spark an American civics revival. [thread] bit.ly/2JYWXc3
Let's start by defining "civics." You might be thinking of lessons from your high school government class. But our research explores a much broader set of skills (e.g., critical thinking, communication) that help students engage in democracy in an active and informed way.
We recently surveyed U.S. social studies teachers to learn more about:

🏫 the state of civic education and media literacy in public schools
✏️the challenges teachers face in promoting kids' civic development
🇺🇸 ways to enhance civic learning opportunities for students.
Read 11 tweets
3 Apr 20
Creative measures are needed to meet the critical care demands of #COVID19.

This quick-turn study and online calculator—our first self-funded research response to the pandemic but not our last—can help health officials plan for patient surges. [thread]

bit.ly/3bQ2iv6
Hospitals can prepare for a surge of patients critically ill with COVID-19, but it will require hospital leaders, practitioners, and regional officials to adopt drastic measures that challenge the standard way of providing care.
This new analysis summarizes a range of evidence-based and promising strategies for creating critical care capacity in U.S. hospitals.

Our researchers identified two tiers of activities that hospitals can take...
Read 8 tweets
21 Feb 20
Americans are placing less faith in institutions that were once trusted sources of information—including the media.

That's one of the key trends that characterizes #TruthDecay—defined as the diminishing role of facts and analysis in American public life.
bit.ly/2V798qG
Tonight, RAND leaders and media experts are gathering at our Santa Monica HQ to discuss the role the media plays in exacerbating #TruthDecay—and the role it can play in fighting the phenomenon.

We'll have live updates on this thread.
We're joined by panelists
🔹@michaeldrich, RAND president and CEO
🔹@jekavanagh, leader of our Countering #TruthDecay initiative
🔹@WendyMcMahon7, president, ABC Owned Television Stations
🔹@NPearlstine, executive editor, @latimes

and moderator @Willow_Bay, dean of @USCAnnenberg
Read 19 tweets
10 Dec 19
One-third of Americans rely on news platforms that they acknowledge are less reliable — mainly social media and peers.

That’s from our new report on how reliability, demographics, and political partisanship factor into Americans’ news choices. bit.ly/2YA5jKE [thread]
☝️This study is the latest release from our research initiative on how to counter #TruthDecay, the diminishing role of facts and analysis in American public life.👇
rand.org/research/proje…
As for the other two-thirds of Americans, they consider their primary news sources (mainly print news and broadcast TV) to be trustworthy.
Read 14 tweets
19 Sep 19
Despite globalization, game-changing technology, and important demographic changes, America's approach to workforce preparation today is more or less the same as it was decades ago.

What might a reimagined system look like? [thread] bit.ly/30b5E9v
RAND experts took a systems approach to rethinking the status quo and how it's failing many Americans. They explored how educators, employers, workers, and other stakeholders can rebuild the current system to bring about much-needed transformation.
First, the researchers explored what's wrong with the system now. They found that workers:
🔸need to re-skill but have no clear path forward
🔸don't have equal access to training
🔸face less stability and more risk
Read 8 tweets
14 May 19
How has the presentation of news — its style and linguistic characteristics — changed over time and across media platforms?

To find out, we conducted a quantitative analysis of 30 years of news stories. This thread provides an overview. rand.org/pubs/research_… via @jekavanagh
Since the late 1980s, U.S.-based journalism has gradually shifted away from objective news and offers more opinion-based content that appeals to emotion and relies heavily on argumentation and advocacy.
Researchers used a RAND text analysis tool to comb through tens of thousands of articles & TV transcripts to identify patterns in the use of words and phrases.

This let them a) see how news has changed in tone, sentiment, and language and b) quantify the sizes of those changes.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!