The red flags re: the #GA06 election (Ossoff v Handel) & the public attention brought to them almost certainly played a key part in the court’s landmark decision that paperless touchscreens are unconstitutional. Those who claim we shld not discuss red flags do a disservice. 1/
https://twitter.com/jennycohn1/status/1297573587042226176
2/ I wrote about the #GA06 election here. Change doesn’t occur in a vacuum. Those who think we can effect meaningful change—while pretending to be able to know that no one has ever hacked an election—are naive. jennycohn1.medium.com/georgia-6-and-…
3/ Fortunately, @MarilynRMarks1 stepped up to the plate in Georgia. But it was not easy.
4/ Democracy requires vigilance and the National media — and even most election protection groups — are unwilling to get into the nitty gritty out of fear it will undermine trust in an u trustworthy election outcome.
You can thank @MarilynRMarks1 that Georgia got rid of its paperless voting machines. Most others wanted to pretend the risks of paperless machines were purely hypothetical. She was the only one to say, “Hold on. There are tangible concerns re: THIS specific election.” 5/
She got the ruling (paperless voting machines are unconstitutional) that no one else had. This is almost certainly why. 6/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
