The last year has led me to a somewhat sad conclusion about racism. I’m noting it down here. Sorry, if this is completely obvious to you, but being in a position of privilege I sometimes have to think out loud to even get the basics. So here goes. 1/
Black Lives Matter … How can that possibly provoke anyone? Well, it has. We have had at least three different ”replies”: ”All Lives Matter”, ”Blue Lives Matter”, and even, on the deep deep right, ”White Lives Matter”. Each, of course, disingenuously missing the point. 2/
But there’s another thing that has appeared very clearly over the last year. Those making the replies mostly don’t believe in them when it is put to the test. 3/
”Blue Lives Matter” as a slogan died on January 6th when its supposed supporters literally and lethally, attacked the police. It was never about the police. 4/
However, the last year has also given lie to the two other slogans. Their proponents have eagerly supported politicians and politics that lied about and grifted on a global pandemic with lethal consequences for everybody – for all lives, including the celebrated white lives. 5/
”No”, seems to be the message, ”they don’t really matter if we have to abandon our pet ideologies to protect them.” 6/
So what matters then? If no lives truly matter, then why the ire against Black Lives Matter? 7/
I’m left with only one explanation. Apparently, it matters greatly to this group of people that black lives don’t matter. 8/
It seems to be a racism so ingrained that they are literally willing to die for it. It’s as if something is taken away from them if black lives matter that is more important to them than life itself. Supremacy, apparently, is more important. 9/
This is my conclusion for now, and it’s a fair bit less hopeful than I could have hoped for. Could someone provide me with a bit of hope please? 10/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In the spirit of the #InternationalWomensDay here's a thread of blogposts I have done over the years with eminent women of genre research holding center stage. All but one are "random" as gender-political statements. They are simply me being impressed by my female colleagues. 1/
I'll pick them up chronologically from my blog. When I first started blogging I had to pay my dues to the best genre blog around. 2/
Then, I wanted to suggest a set of reading texts in genre research for literary PhDs. Eight texts; five by eminent women. The spread mirrors the field just fine. 3/
This is your daily reminder that you have millions of friends and allies in the EU.
Also, can I just repeat what a great favor you do your country. The government's visage as the face of Britain has been one of lording arrogance. You show the world that Britain has another face.
Interestingly the example provided by @MerriamWebster is in itself a case in point:
"Wherever French voters had turned, somehow there was still a neoliberal lording over them in the Élysée Palace, favoring the diktats of the European Union, the forces of unregulated markets, the juggernaut of globalization."
I have to tell you this little story about the best answer to the worst question I ever witnessed. It was two minute masterclass in educating stupidity. If only I could ever be that good. This is not strictly #ForeniscLinguistics, but it is something with language and law. 1/
I was at a public lecture about the concept of justice in the Danish legal system, and the lecturer was the Danish public Ombudsman at the time. Quite possibly the most silver-tongued person I ever met. 2/
Now, the function of the Ombudsman is literally the rule of law. And the Ombudsman's primary purpose is to protect citizens from legal, administrative, and broadly speaking public overreach. As such he is, of course [sigh], universally detested by the tough-on-crime crowd. 3/
#AnneFreadman is well known among #genre researchers for her insistence on seeing genre as a loose open-ended system of interrelations and differences. A key point in her understand is her presentation of what she calls "not-statement". 2/
The point is most easily made in an example. If I say "a refrigerator is not a deep freezer" the statement will almost always be more meaningful than if I say "a refrigerator is not a rhinoceros." 3/
"Many of them are very young, have little or no experience of government and, it’s perhaps fair to say, a greater degree of confidence in their own abilities than a more objective analysis would warrant."
"... for increasingly there are reports (£) of the resentment that experienced MPs and ministers (and, I would assume, senior civil servants) feel about the transparent contempt with which they are treated by the Vote Leave wunderkinds. ...
Bad enough to be subjected to that indignity by those who are competent; intolerable when it comes from those who are serial bunglers."
Hver gang min fireårige datter står og vasker hænder synger hun:
Vaske hænder
Raske venner
På med vand og sæbe
Væk med alt det slemme
Tommel ikke glemme
Før vi spiser
Når vi grisser
Og gør stort og tisser.
Hun har lært det i børnehaven, og hun bliver troligen ved med at vaske hænderne, indtil sangen af omme, og tomlen på begge hænder får også en tur på det relevante sted i sangen.
Nej, det er vel ikke en professionel håndvask, som kommer ud af det, men jeg kan godt love, at hendes hænder er betydeligt renere bagefter, end mine nogensinde blev det i fireårsalderen. Så #genren læredigt er virkelig kommet til sin ret her.