Covid UK: Different models make different assumptions. 'Clearly, there is a substantial amount of uncertainty about these long-term forecasts as indicated by the wide credible intervals. Part of this uncertainty is due to the fluctuations in transmission risk and mobility.' (1)
Here is the LSHTM model for a large surge in hospitalisations in September 2021 (2)
Here is the Imperial model for hospital admissions. Looks a bit worse, with an earlier even higher peak under the worst case scenario (3)
And the Warwick model which has its peak earlier in August, and a worst case of almost double the hospital admissions peak in January. For all models see gov.uk/government/pub… (4)
UCL's Friston dynamic causal model is different. It responds "to real-time deaths, infections, vaccinations, vaccine effectiveness data, hospital admissions + Google mobility trends, informs transmission trends + the 'R' rate, now estimated as 1.12." (5) telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/04/0…
Critics point out that Friston's model was overly optimistic last year, which he agrees with, but also partly because of the emergence of the new UK variant. But he says that the new model is informed by better current data.(6)
I'm not a modeller. I can see arguments for pessimism about another surge, + also for vaccines bringing about herd immunity quicker than we hoped. Either way, we need to focus on vaxx AND the public health response to lock down infections + contacts as quickly as possible. (7)
If you want to watch two animated simulations of natural spread of the virus and the impact of rapid testing and isolation on spread, watch Nobel laureate Paul Romer's two models from a year ago. paulromer.net/covid-sim-part… and paulromer.net/covid-sim-part… (8)
Local public health teams (1 worker per 1500 pop) w finance support, are the best way to identify cases and contacts quickly, + to monitor and ensure compliance with isolation. Asian states look on with shock at the failure of the UK, USA and most European states to do this. (9)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Vaccines alone will not control the pandemic. Isolation of cases and their contacts is critical as cases fall. (1) theguardian.com/global-develop…
Sir Patrick says they got it right a yr ago when they predicted a 2nd + 3rd wave. But he + SAGE on Mar 16 2020 wrote that they were 'unanimous' that China and Asian states wd face a massive second wave. They didn’t. Why? Bec they suppress outbreaks rapidly w trace +isolation. (2)
Two weeks ago Sir Patrick agreed test, trace and isolation would be critical as cases fall. Yet no mention again today of our leaky programme - test results delayed, contacts missed, isolation not monitored, Tories on TV saying £500 'encourages people to be infected'. (3)
Control of the global pandemic is a balance between achieving population immunity (vaccines, natural infection) and containing/suppressing/eliminating the virus through public health measures (find, test, trace, isolate, behaviour change). Lockdowns are a sign of failure. (1)
Countries that implemented public health measures at speed (S Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, Vietnam, China, Thailand, Finland, Iceland, Denmark etc) avoided national lockdowns and their terrible economic effects. And have far, far lower death rates. (2)
Attention to local public health detail is essential...isolate all people with suspected symptoms, rapid test results, one community worker per 1500 population in teams of 5-6, links with primary care teams +data, supported + monitored isolation, reimbursement to all. (3)
My lengthy thread on test, trace and isolate in light of Sir Patrick Vallance’s comments and the Public Accounts Committee Report committees.parliament.uk/committee/127/… (1)
Yesterday, when asked about his assessment of TTI by Greg Clark, Sir Patrick Vallance said ” Test and trace is working very well at the moment” (March 9 Science Select Committee, 11.32am) (2) parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/36…
Sir Patrick agreed that “The isolate bit is very important (at all levels of cases)..TTI is more important as case numbers fall”. He also identified the importance of backward contact tracing i.e finding which contacts caused the case infection in order to identify clusters.(3)
Sorry George. Only just seen this. Thanks for the references to hypothesis papers. I don't disagree with Lavine et al’s model when she suggests "SARS-CoV-2 could join the ranks of mild, cold-causing endemic HCoVs in the long run”. Depends upon what is meant by the long run. (1)
Nor that vaccines could slow or accelerate this process depending upon the type of immunity they induce. I certainly agree with her that "These results reinforce the importance of behavioral containment during pandemic vaccine rollout”. (2)
I also agree with Veldhoen and Simas that the "question is whether the vaccines will be effective against reinfection or even eradicate SARS-CoV-2. Here, we suggest both answers are most probably no”. (3)
There is a lot of nonsense about Zero Covid being an extreme position, only possible in repressive states (er..S Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Norway, Finland, NZ??) and our UK strategy reflects a more sensible centrist view. So compare the UK with successful countries...(1)
In fact we had a clear statement for proper public health control of the epidemic from WHO on Jan 29 2020, and the China Report from WHO on Feb 24 2020. All measures were not controversial and not based on rocket science or modelling. (2)
A new paper from Anhui province (pop 64 million, almost same as UK) in China shows how control was achieved without any severe or prolonged lockdown. sciencedirect.com/science/articl… (3)
Today we lost 1820 of our citizens. Many of these deaths could have been prevented. I plead with our Secretary of State @MattHancock and @CMO_England to make changes to our community protective shield as follows: (1)
Face the data with humility. Latest data show only 32% of in-person test results were received within 24 hours...Way too slow. For all routes combined, 18.3% of tests from all test sites were received within 24 hours of a test. (2)
Since Test and Trace launched, 97.8% of all contacts managed by local health protection teams have been successfully reached. Performance of call centres is much worse. The % reached within 24h of the case that reported them reaching the contact tracing system fell to 67.7%. (3)