Control of the global pandemic is a balance between achieving population immunity (vaccines, natural infection) and containing/suppressing/eliminating the virus through public health measures (find, test, trace, isolate, behaviour change). Lockdowns are a sign of failure. (1)
Countries that implemented public health measures at speed (S Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, Vietnam, China, Thailand, Finland, Iceland, Denmark etc) avoided national lockdowns and their terrible economic effects. And have far, far lower death rates. (2)
Attention to local public health detail is essential...isolate all people with suspected symptoms, rapid test results, one community worker per 1500 population in teams of 5-6, links with primary care teams +data, supported + monitored isolation, reimbursement to all. (3)
We failed to do this last March, last July, last September. We still haven't invested in local public health teams. Last week a district PH director said he has 19 contact tracers, not the 100 he needs, funded by his routine budget, not the £37 billion wasted by outsourcing. (4)
So our government and advisers pursue a vaccine and lockdown policy only, causing huge economic damage. I hope high vaccine coverage will solve the problem. But we could have avoided so many deaths and lockdowns if we had invested in proper local public health. (5)
@CMO_England was right to emphasise the inequalities in our country and @uksciencechief the importance of FTTI as cases fall. But our find, test, trace and isolate system can never be fit for purpose without local investment to ensure contact tracing and isolation.(6)
The best case scenario right now is that high vaccine coverage plus natural infection in the young will create population immunity and free us all from restrictions. (7)
But @CMO and modellers predict further surges. The British variant is far more transmissible +increases severity of illness in younger people. We cd see many more cases and hospitalisations in people under 65. We must invest in local contact tracers and finance for isolation. (8)
We cannot eradicate the virus from the earth. Zero Covid aims to eliminate spread from countries but yes is inherently unstable. New outbreaks are a risk: an even bigger reason to have local public health teams to suppress them quickly as in Asia. (9)
The S. Africa variant is 10% of cases in France + appears largely resistant to AZ vaccine. It cd replace the British variant as cases fall here. I simply don't understand why UK policy is vaccines or lockdowns, + ignores local FTTI teams. And why govt advisers say nothing.(10)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My lengthy thread on test, trace and isolate in light of Sir Patrick Vallance’s comments and the Public Accounts Committee Report committees.parliament.uk/committee/127/… (1)
Yesterday, when asked about his assessment of TTI by Greg Clark, Sir Patrick Vallance said ” Test and trace is working very well at the moment” (March 9 Science Select Committee, 11.32am) (2) parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/36…
Sir Patrick agreed that “The isolate bit is very important (at all levels of cases)..TTI is more important as case numbers fall”. He also identified the importance of backward contact tracing i.e finding which contacts caused the case infection in order to identify clusters.(3)
Sorry George. Only just seen this. Thanks for the references to hypothesis papers. I don't disagree with Lavine et al’s model when she suggests "SARS-CoV-2 could join the ranks of mild, cold-causing endemic HCoVs in the long run”. Depends upon what is meant by the long run. (1)
Nor that vaccines could slow or accelerate this process depending upon the type of immunity they induce. I certainly agree with her that "These results reinforce the importance of behavioral containment during pandemic vaccine rollout”. (2)
I also agree with Veldhoen and Simas that the "question is whether the vaccines will be effective against reinfection or even eradicate SARS-CoV-2. Here, we suggest both answers are most probably no”. (3)
There is a lot of nonsense about Zero Covid being an extreme position, only possible in repressive states (er..S Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Norway, Finland, NZ??) and our UK strategy reflects a more sensible centrist view. So compare the UK with successful countries...(1)
In fact we had a clear statement for proper public health control of the epidemic from WHO on Jan 29 2020, and the China Report from WHO on Feb 24 2020. All measures were not controversial and not based on rocket science or modelling. (2)
A new paper from Anhui province (pop 64 million, almost same as UK) in China shows how control was achieved without any severe or prolonged lockdown. sciencedirect.com/science/articl… (3)
Today we lost 1820 of our citizens. Many of these deaths could have been prevented. I plead with our Secretary of State @MattHancock and @CMO_England to make changes to our community protective shield as follows: (1)
Face the data with humility. Latest data show only 32% of in-person test results were received within 24 hours...Way too slow. For all routes combined, 18.3% of tests from all test sites were received within 24 hours of a test. (2)
Since Test and Trace launched, 97.8% of all contacts managed by local health protection teams have been successfully reached. Performance of call centres is much worse. The % reached within 24h of the case that reported them reaching the contact tracing system fell to 67.7%. (3)
SAGE Minutes Dec 22: "It is highly unlikely that measures with stringency + adherence in line with the measures in England in November (i.e. with schools open) wd be sufficient to maintain R below 1 in the presence of the new variant. R would be lower with schools closed"
SAGE Minutes Dec 22 "It is not known whether measures with similar stringency and adherence as Spring, with both primary and secondary schools closed, would be sufficient to bring R below 1 in the presence of the new variant." google.com/search?client=…
SAGE Minutes Dec 22 "ACTION: PHE to share information on new variant and South Africa variant with policymakers and ministers for consideration of action".
The PM says all frontline workers, people aged 70+ and people with serious underlying conditions will be vaccinated by mid-February. That’s 13 million, so 2 million per week. Potentially doable if GPs are supported with staff, volunteers funding and supplies. (1)
We must see a generous allowance funded by Treasury for isolation when infected or a contact. Without it, transmission will remain high increasing the risk of vaccine resistance. If not, could be the costliest mistake of the whole pandemic. (2)
Border screening must be made much tighter. Especially to identify new aggressive strains from other countries. (3)