1/ Assessing mandatory stay‐at‐home and business closure effects on the spread of COVID‐19 (Bendavid, Oh, Bhattacharya, Ioannidis)
"After subtracting less-restrictive NPI effects, we find no benefit of more-restrictive NPIs on case growth in any country." onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…
2/ "In the absence of empirical assessment, the effects of NPIs on reduced transmission are assumed rather than assessed.
"The slowing of COVID-19 epidemic growth was similar in many contexts in a way that is more consistent with natural dynamics than policy prescriptions."
3/ "We estimate the unique effects of more-restrictive NPIs (mrNPIs) on case growth rate in the spring of 2020 by comparing effects in other countries to those in Sweden/South Korea.
"The data consists of daily case numbers in subnational administration regions of each country."
4/ "Because the true number of infections is not visible, it is impossible to assess the impact of national policies on transmission.
"We follow other studies and implicitly assume that observed dynamics may represent a consistent shadow of the underlying infection dynamics."
5/ "The average daily growth rate prior to NPIs ranged from 23% (95CI 13% to 34%) in Spain to 47% (95CI 39% to 55%) in the Netherlands.
"The variation of pre-policy growth rates may reflect testing coverage and pre-policy behavior changes."
6/ "While the effects of 3 individual NPIs were positive (contributing paradoxically to case growth) and significant, the effects of about half of individual NPIs were negative and significant.
"The combined effect of all NPIs were negative and significant in 9 of 10 countries."
7/ "After accounting for less-restrictive NPIs (lrNPIs), none of the 16 comparisons (vs. Sweden or South Korea) had more-restrictive NPIs (mrNPIs) that were significantly beneficial.
"The 95% confidence intervals excluded a 30% reduction in daily growth in all 16 comparisons."
8/ "In this framework, there is no evidence 'lockdowns' contributed to bending the curve in England, France, Germany, Iran, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, or the U.S. in early 2020.
"Most of the effect sizes point to an *increase* (not stat. significant) in the case growth rate."
9/ "It is possible that stay-at-home orders facilitate transmission if they increase contact in closed spaces.
"Data on individual behaviors show dramatic decline days to weeks *prior* to implementation of business closures and mandatory stay-at-home orders in our countries."
10/ "School closures cost an estimated 5.5 million life-years for U.S. children during the spring closure alone.
"Considerations of harm should play a role in decisions, especially if an NPI is also ineffective.
"Sweden did not close primary schools in 2020 as of this writing."
11/ "While we find no evidence of benefits for mrNPIs, the underlying data/methods still have important limitations."
* Cross-region comparisons are difficult
* Case counts are a noisy measure of transmission
* The underlying dynamics may be non-linear and contain feedback loops
12/ "We fail to find an additional benefit of stay-at-home orders and business closures above less-restrictive NPIs.
"The data cannot fully exclude the possibility of some benefits. However, even if they exist, they may not match the harms of the more aggressive measures."
13/ The Supporting Information section includes the chart below as well as the code the authors used for their data preparation, analysis, and visualization. (Visit the page below and scroll to the bottom.)
* IFR estimation
* Pandemic models may be overfitted & subject to publication bias
* Paper: Assessing mandatory stay‐at‐home & business closure effects on the spread of COVID‐19
* Politicization and ad-hominem attacks
1/ Crowding and Factor Returns (Kang, Rouwenhorst, Tang)
"We construct a direct measure of factor strategy crowding that is based on CFTC aggregate positioning. Crowding measure has a strong negative predictive impact on expected factor returns."
2/ Crowding at the commodity level = excess speculative pressure (deviation of non-commercial traders’ positions from the 52-week average, scaled by open interest)
"We will show that it is straightforward to aggregate individual commodity crowding to the factor strategy level."
3/ "Speculative positions show substantial short-term variation (σ ≈ 15%) that is independent from accommodating the hedging demands of commercial traders, which are unlikely to vary substantially at the weekly horizon."
1/ Effectiveness of three versus six feet of physical distancing for controlling spread of COVID-19 among primary and secondary students and staff
"There is no sig. difference between requiring ≥3 & ≥6 feet if other mitigation measures are implemented." academic.oup.com/cid/advance-ar…
2/ "National and international guidelines differ about physical distancing for the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission; studies directly comparing impact of ≥3 vs. ≥6 feet of distancing in school settings are lacking.
"The majority of districts required universal masking."
3/ "Current guidance from the WHO is to maintain one meter (3.3 feet) between students; the CDC recommends 6 feet.
"Data from different countries implementing different distancing guidelines seem to suggest no major difference, though they did not do a direct comparison."
1/ Can Momentum Investing Be Saved? (Arnott, Kalesnik, Kose, Wu)
"Live results for mutual funds that take on a momentum factor loading are surprisingly weak. But momentum can probably be saved, even net of fees and trading costs."
2/ "A momentum strategy is very vulnerable to crashes that tend to occur when the momentum trade is relatively expensive and in periods of heightened volatility. Its performance has also shown dismayingly high global correlation—especially during the crashes—since about 1999."
3/ "Momentum dominates everywhere except Japan. Since being documented in US stocks, the effect has also been documented in many other asset classes. So on paper, momentum looks fantastic!
"Sadly, live results net of trading costs hint at trouble for momentum investors."
1/ Best Strategies for Inflationary Times (Neville, Draaisma, Funnell, Harvey, Hemert)
"Unexpected inflation is bad for bonds and equities, with local inflation mattering most, while commodities and futures trend following performance is strong."
2/ Inflationary regimes are when:
* YOY CPI ≥ 5% and is above 50% of its highest level over the past 24 months, OR
* YOY CPI ≥ 2%, is below 50% of its highest level over the past 24 months, then re-accelerates to ≥ 5%
* Episode length ≥ 6 months
B/M (market values updated monthly; financials and small stocks excluded)
Industry-adjusted B/M
Negative of five-year spot return (commodities, bonds)
Five-year change in ten-year yield (bonds)
Five-year change in relative PPP (currencies)
3/ "Value spreads in stocks, industries, commodities and equity indexes correlate strongly and positively with each other.
"The first PC explains 51% of total variation. The correlation between a simple across-asset-class average of the value spreads and the first PC is 0.95."