A friendly reminder to always approach the topic of vaccinations with empathy. Hesitancy is complex & has many layers.

ie. this week, I've been receiving a lot of msgs from people scheduled for 1st or 2nd AstraZeneca vax. They want a vaccine but are SO anxious from the news 😔
Anxiety is also high in those who recently received their 1st dose & are now seeing headlines that have them on edge.

I am glad the potential rare side effect of clots has been so transparently shared by experts & media.

But all the more reason to be kind in our scicomm 💕
I've had anxiety forever (in the midst of finding a new therapist now!🎉), so I feel each one of these messages in my core.

This pandemic really sucks.

I hope through empathetic scicomm with culture + trauma-informed approaches to hesitancy we can end it sooner.
PS. If you've also been feeling anxious over the news about this vaccine, I sincerely hope this video can help:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 🔬Samantha Yammine, PhD (aka Science Sam)

🔬Samantha Yammine, PhD (aka Science Sam) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @heysciencesam

14 Apr
I'm reflecting a lot on Aristotle's 3 appeals for effective rhetoric.

In part b/c of the news about the very rare & atypical clots after AstraZeneca & now Janssen J&J vaccination... but also just with how we talk about the science of the pandemic in general.

#SciComm 🧵 | 1/13
I know many argue rhetoric - or persuasive communication - has no place in science, and I agree my goal is never to persuade but to inform.

But we always have to make our arguments "appealing", even those based on facts.

To catch attention, & make em relatable/memorable.

2/13
We can debate the role of rhetoric in science communication later, but for now, the three appeals are:

✨LOGOS - logic
✨PATHOS - emotion
✨ETHOS - character/credibility

3/13
Read 13 tweets
15 Sep 20
🧵

People in their 20s are now disproportionately represented in new COVID-19 cases in Ontario.

Instead of shaming & blaming, I asked them what challenges they’re currently facing with respect to the pandemic.

After 100s of replies, some key themes emerged. Here they are:
Many people in their 20s mentioned peer and social pressure, plus general difficulty navigating behaviours of those around them as a major challenge during the pandemic.
Difficulty seeing or isolating from family was cited as a key challenge folks in their 20s are facing.

This one is big given data from France suggesting cases in young people eventually spread to older folks in 3-5 weeks.
Read 13 tweets
16 May 20
A quick visual guide to risk assessment, based off some of the fantastic research summaries created by @mugecevik @firefoxx66 and @ErinBromage

1/13 Graphic saying covid-19 exposure risk = viral dose x time
Your exposure risk is some function of viral dose & time.

The tricky thing is we don’t know how many virus particles it takes to cause an infection, and this will likely vary from person to person.

The good news is we know some ways to reduce our relative risks

2/13 Graphic saying We don’t yet know how many virus particles it takes to cause an infection, but we do know how to reduce the chances of virus particles getting near our eyes nose and mouth. Yes physical distancing and hand hygiene, but wait there’s more!
Time is perhaps an under-appreciated component of the risk equation.

Slow & steady can “win the race” to an infection too.

3/13 Time complicates things. Even exposure to a low viral dose for a long time can become risky. The more we understand the risks in our environments, the better we can get at navigating them - for the sake of everyone!
Read 14 tweets
20 Mar 20
PSA TO MEDIA:

“AEROSOLS” is jargon - IT IS YOUR JOB TO CLEARLY STATE HOW THEY DIFFER FROM DROPLETS WHEN SHARING RESULTS FROM THE NEJM PAPER.
In a nutshell: COVID-19 patients likely cough/sneeze DROPLETS, which are larger than aerosols and all fall to the floor within 1-2m, give or take.

AEROSOLS are smaller so can last in air for longer, but are very likely only produced in hospitals after certain medical procedures
THE TAKEAWAY: this paper does NOT mean SARS-CoV2 is floating around in the air for 3 hrs - it does NOT seem to be airborne like that (the R value would be much higher if it were).

Healthcare workers DO have to deal with aerosols so save the masks for them.
Read 6 tweets
3 Mar 20
YES, hand sanitizer DOES kill many viruses, not just bacteria. Here's how.

#FactsNotFear #COVID19
To clarify the line about water (I struggled to multi-task😅): a mixture of water & alcohol is better than 100% alcohol for many reasons - the water keeps hands from drying out too much, helps with penetration, and even slows down evaporation of the alcohol so it has time to work
But it’s the mixture of alcohol in your hand sanitizer that helps to dissolve away the molecules that make up the cell membrane of bacteria or outer coat of a virus.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!