Remember the global financial crash? Packaged mortgage securities? The Big Short? This time the problem may be hedge funds borrowing to gamble on stocks, using the same stocks as securities.(1)
The hedge fund industry has borrowed a reported $814 billion in the past year, to gamble on stocks, a 49 per cent increase since Feb 2020. The true figure is likely much higher, into trillions. (2)
Gambling on stocks using borrowed money pushes up share prices which can then be sold. But some hedge funds may get the timing wrong, leading to big losses if the market smells a rat. This is what happened with Archegos, a relatively small family hedge fund. (3)
In turn banks that give these 'margin loans', like Credit Suisse, can lose a fortune and destabilise the banking and credit system. The regulators say these loans should never be for more than the value of 50% of assets bought. In Archegos case it was 85%. (4)
Archegos owned about 209 million shares of Viacom CBS and 609 billion class B shares ,in total worth $20 billion bought opaquely through derivatives so no one knew. That amounted to 34% of all Viacom shares. (5)
Yet Fed rules are that once you own 5% of a company you must declare this publicly. The share price soared and other investors didn't know why. The online financial press encouraged retail investors to buy ViacomCBS! (6)
But Archegos didnt have an exit plan because if they tried to sell large amounts of stock in a hurry the share price would plunge. So when the banks called in loans to Archegos, savvy banks rushed to dump their Viacom stocks. (7)
The share price fell by 50%. Credit Suisse was last to sell and lost £4.7 billion. This is deeply destabilising to credit markets, almost like a Lehman's moment. If the market cannot discover price quickly because the media are tricked, a lot of people suffer. (8)
The banks shd not be lending huge amounts for hedge funds to gamble. Central banks should stop it. Otherwise we shall soon have a repeat of the sub-prime mortgage disaster, another case of mispricing of assets, which led to the collapse on the US and much of the world economy.(9)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Anthony Costello

Anthony Costello Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @globalhlthtwit

8 Apr
Covid UK: Different models make different assumptions. 'Clearly, there is a substantial amount of uncertainty about these long-term forecasts as indicated by the wide credible intervals. Part of this uncertainty is due to the fluctuations in transmission risk and mobility.' (1)
Here is the LSHTM model for a large surge in hospitalisations in September 2021 (2)
Here is the Imperial model for hospital admissions. Looks a bit worse, with an earlier even higher peak under the worst case scenario (3)
Read 9 tweets
5 Apr
Vaccines alone will not control the pandemic. Isolation of cases and their contacts is critical as cases fall. (1) theguardian.com/global-develop…
Sir Patrick says they got it right a yr ago when they predicted a 2nd + 3rd wave. But he + SAGE on Mar 16 2020 wrote that they were 'unanimous' that China and Asian states wd face a massive second wave. They didn’t. Why? Bec they suppress outbreaks rapidly w trace +isolation. (2)
Two weeks ago Sir Patrick agreed test, trace and isolation would be critical as cases fall. Yet no mention again today of our leaky programme - test results delayed, contacts missed, isolation not monitored, Tories on TV saying £500 'encourages people to be infected'. (3)
Read 4 tweets
26 Mar
Control of the global pandemic is a balance between achieving population immunity (vaccines, natural infection) and containing/suppressing/eliminating the virus through public health measures (find, test, trace, isolate, behaviour change). Lockdowns are a sign of failure. (1)
Countries that implemented public health measures at speed (S Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, Vietnam, China, Thailand, Finland, Iceland, Denmark etc) avoided national lockdowns and their terrible economic effects. And have far, far lower death rates. (2)
Attention to local public health detail is essential...isolate all people with suspected symptoms, rapid test results, one community worker per 1500 population in teams of 5-6, links with primary care teams +data, supported + monitored isolation, reimbursement to all. (3)
Read 10 tweets
10 Mar
My lengthy thread on test, trace and isolate in light of Sir Patrick Vallance’s comments and the Public Accounts Committee Report committees.parliament.uk/committee/127/… (1)
Yesterday, when asked about his assessment of TTI by Greg Clark, Sir Patrick Vallance said ” Test and trace is working very well at the moment” (March 9 Science Select Committee, 11.32am) (2) parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/36…
Sir Patrick agreed that “The isolate bit is very important (at all levels of cases)..TTI is more important as case numbers fall”. He also identified the importance of backward contact tracing i.e finding which contacts caused the case infection in order to identify clusters.(3)
Read 26 tweets
10 Mar
Sorry George. Only just seen this. Thanks for the references to hypothesis papers. I don't disagree with Lavine et al’s model when she suggests "SARS-CoV-2 could join the ranks of mild, cold-causing endemic HCoVs in the long run”. Depends upon what is meant by the long run. (1)
Nor that vaccines could slow or accelerate this process depending upon the type of immunity they induce. I certainly agree with her that "These results reinforce the importance of behavioral containment during pandemic vaccine rollout”. (2)
I also agree with Veldhoen and Simas that the "question is whether the vaccines will be effective against reinfection or even eradicate SARS-CoV-2. Here, we suggest both answers are most probably no”. (3)
Read 8 tweets
7 Feb
There is a lot of nonsense about Zero Covid being an extreme position, only possible in repressive states (er..S Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Norway, Finland, NZ??) and our UK strategy reflects a more sensible centrist view. So compare the UK with successful countries...(1)
In fact we had a clear statement for proper public health control of the epidemic from WHO on Jan 29 2020, and the China Report from WHO on Feb 24 2020. All measures were not controversial and not based on rocket science or modelling. (2)
A new paper from Anhui province (pop 64 million, almost same as UK) in China shows how control was achieved without any severe or prolonged lockdown. sciencedirect.com/science/articl… (3)
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!