Big headline annual surge in China’s GDP in 1st qtr, but largely due to almost 10% reported quarterly fall this time last year. On a quarterly basis, last quarter was actually a damp squib riding just 0.6%, aka 2.4% annualised. /1
This follows a 2.5% quarterly rise in Q4 2020. At this rate, officially reported growth will be tumbling rapidly before year end towards 4%. Jan/Feb were esp disappointing partly related to a COVID scare, but the structure of the GDP growth - more details tomorrow - was too. /2
Most of the increase was thanks to industry and construction. Plus exports. Consumer spending is showing good y/y comparisons of course, but isn’t carrying the load as one might have hoped. /3
Not yet at least. Perhaps better in Q2. But can’t endure because foundational support for the HH sector just isn’t there. So if other restraints over real estate, local govt spending etc persist, there might be a govt rethink on infrastructure, credit etc later this yr /3
Just to contextualise, we are still in pandemic pandemonium as far as official econ stats are concerned. Was always case that economy would return to lower growth as it ran back into structural headwinds. But Q1 sends warning this point might’ve arrived sooner than expected. Ends

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with George Magnus

George Magnus Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @georgemagnus1

9 Mar
As always look at these numbers through more calibrated lenses than cheerleading authors. Example: citing China’s ambitious planned urbanisation rise from 69 to 65% doesn’t map with eg Scott Rozelle’s trenchant research in which he says only 34% of pop have urban hukou .....1/
....registration. So there are many ppl classified as urban who have neither urban status and benefits or live in places only loosely urban. Same with R&D spending. Compounding growth over 5 years tells you little about quality or content. ....2/
....and as China’s former Industry Minister, Miao Wei, confirmed last Sunday, China is weak in foundational technologies and products. So catch up needs to be qualified. ...3/
Read 5 tweets
5 Mar
Short version, with comment, of Li Keqiang's Government Work Report today at China's National People's Congress. More details on 14th FYP by early next week. Try this for starters. 1/ 11
Leaving aside backward looking parts of the GWR, with emphasis on the positive economic consequences of containing the pandemic and on eradication of poverty, the forward-looking parts were rather sober overall. 2/11
Contrary to expectations, the govt did announce a growth target of 'about 6 per cent', but in 2021, hitting this target will be like falling off a log in a fast flowing river. Li said there will be annual targets for economic growth. Hmmm 3/11
Read 11 tweets
18 Feb
Hooray, I have found a soul mate in @CapEconomics whose latest rpt says 'Our long-run forecasts suggest that China will still be the second largest economy, measured at market exchange rates, in 2050'. My view too. Read on /1
They say that if China hasn't overtaken the US by 2030, it won't. and even if it did, the bragging rights might not last (my words). They say China's poorer demographics and output per worker are the key drivers of this non consensus view. I think there's more /2
So I would add 2 things. First, the prod'ty part of this is key. I'm also more optimistic that US economic structure, assets and strengths still give it an edge, along with politics permitting more robust institutions and stronger tech branding and commercialising capability /3
Read 6 tweets
26 Mar 20
Thread on saving (mostly older peoples) lives v economy. Spoiler: rant because a lot of ppl incl on @BBCr4today misunderstand or misrepresent this. There is no choice. 1/n
Ppl, incl a Bristol Univ Prof in risk mgt, say economic slumps are injurious to health and we have the balance wrong. We should protect economy more and presumably be more tolerant of higher cv fatalities. 2/n
It’s true that slumps take a heavy toll on physical and mental health. Which is partly why we have well developed if not always adequately funded social sec and healthcare progs. But in today’s cv world, the deaths vs economy argument is a total red herring and wrong 3/n
Read 10 tweets
17 Jun 19
On HK protest movement against the E law, lots of thoughts swirling around. No question it’s been a huge boost for HKers, who must feel buoyed that if the govt or Beijing persist in erosion of civil liberties, they know what to do. Yet, this is ultimately toxic for the CCP 1/n
At same time, also no question that this is the biggest climb down Xi Jinping has made since coming to power. The all-powerful, truck no nonsense, leader of China has had to bow to street politics. This will not have made him happy or quiescent.2/n
Under the circumstances though, and with a G20 coming up in Osaka next week, he had no choice. Interesting though, that faced with international and domestic pushback, the gov has virtually eradicated Made in China 25 rhetoric, moderated its Belt and Road strategy (pro tem) 3/n
Read 7 tweets
6 Jan 19
Remarkable graphic showing that even though China rebalancing has made some progress, it is light years away and structurally a country mile from its developed and emerging peers. 1/n
Though China has GDP per capita about same as Brazil, its consumption per capita is comparable to Nigeria. Can you imagine? Not what you see in glitzy Shanghai or Shenzhen, but a truism regardless. Now look at the debate about rebalancing and reform, and you'll see.... 2/n
....the emptiness of the agenda on what's needed to really move China from top left to middle or bottom left in the chart (first tweet). Of course, as the investment rate drops away, pushing growth much lower, the Consumption share will rise, but that's just maths, and not... 3/n
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!