Two months ago India confirmed 11,300 cases per day.

This shows the rise of confirmed cases since then.
A straight line on a logarithmic axis tells you that you are looking at exponential growth with a constant growth rate.

Now India confirms more than 200,000 cases a day.
This is how the rate of positive tests changed in that same period.

A strongly rising positive rate tells us that the testing efforts are not keeping up with the size of the outbreak.

(here is all the data: ourworldindata.org/explorers/coro…)
COVID deaths in India have now surpassed the previous peak from last September.
Both, confirmed cases and confirmed deaths are increasing at a rate of about 60% per week.

The growth rate of cases at the top and of deaths below.

All the data is here: ourworldindata.org/explorers/coro…
One crucial question is by how much confirmed cases differ from the actual true number of cases.

The IHME estimates the true number of cases and this is how their estimates compare with the reported number of cases in India.

[we publish it here ourworldindata.org/covid-models]
On April 2 the ratio between confirmed cases to true cases was estimated to be about 20.
(i.e. 5% of cases are detected)

If this is accurate, then the current number of infections in India is about 4.4 million per day.
(220,000 confirmed cases times 20)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Max Roser

Max Roser Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MaxCRoser

14 Apr
Forests in England declined for many centuries up until the late 19th century.

Then deforestation came to an end and was actually reversed: the forested area has doubled since then.

From @_HannahRitchie’s work on forests and deforestation ourworldindata.org/forests-and-de…
Many are asking good questions, so I'll write a short thread.

If you want to know more then follow Hannah (@_HannahRitchie), she has a lot of work coming out on forest transitions.
The tweet-sized summary is that humans – throughout history and today – cut down forests for two big reasons:

Because they need the trees themselves or because they find the forested land to be more valuable when it is not forested.
Read 8 tweets
4 Apr
This thread is more personal than most of the things I share here, but I’m at my limit with Jason Hickel.

I want to explain why I dislike him so much and how we got here.

This is a personal story over several years so it’ll take a bit of time.
Jason Hickel is an anthropologist who wrote many articles and tweets about me, my motivations, and my work in the last couple of years.

I’m sure there are good points among them, where he is right and I’m wrong. But some of his big claims against my work are false.
One such big claim he put forward in an article in The Guardian. It was about my work on global poverty and he claimed that it “couldn’t be more wrong” to say that global poverty has declined.

It was shared tens of thousands of times. (theguardian.com/commentisfree/… ).
Read 72 tweets
1 Apr
This just got published and is very good.

A new study that asks: How has extreme poverty changed in the last 2 centuries?

The authors estimate poverty in many ways.
Their main innovation is to rely on 'a cost of basic needs approach' based on Bob Allen’s recent work.

👇 thread
The authors write that in 1820 roughly three-quarters of the world "could not afford a tiny space to live, food that would not induce malnutrition, and some minimum heating capacity.”

As you see in the chart above, the huge majority of the world was extremely poor in the past.
Since 1820 the share in extreme poverty across the globe declined to 10%, "the lowest level ever achieved", according to this study.

But of course more recently the share in extreme poverty has unfortunately increased.
Read 20 tweets
25 Mar
A very helpful interactive interactive visualization on global poverty.

@DanyX23 built this tool that lets you see the share of every country that lives below any absolute poverty line you might be interested in.

This is the share living on less than $20 per day.

👇link/thread
Here is the link to this tool that Daniel Bachler built – have a look at it, it is very interesting really: observablehq.com/@danyx/share-o…

And as another example this chart shows the share of the world population living on less than $10 per day. Image
He based this visualization on my last post for which I made this visualization that shows the share of the world living on less than $30 per day.

"How much economic growth is necessary to reduce global poverty substantially?"

–– ourworldindata.org/poverty-minimu… Image
Read 8 tweets
9 Mar
Just saw that the World Health Organization is now relying on the COVID vaccination database that we are producing at @OurWorldInData!

Great to see that our work is useful for them during this pandemic.
• On our site you find it here: ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinat…
• On the WHO's site here:
worldhealthorg.shinyapps.io/covid/
And as I mentioned before, this database is maintained by just one person: my colleague Edouard Mathieu.

Edouard started the global vaccination database in December and by now he keeps the entire world informed about the global vaccination campaign.

Follow him here: @redouad
Read 4 tweets
7 Mar
The IPCC climate reports rely on scenarios of how the world will change in the coming decades.

This is the IPCC's description of the 'Sustainability Scenario'.

What does the IPCC assume for economic growth here?
Global GDP per capita increases to over $80,000 per person.
Better health and education, an 'emphasis on human well-being', and lower resource and energy intensity –– the future described in that scenario sounds like a future that I'd like to help achieve.

At the same time that scenario is the most optimistic about global CO2 emissions.
This scenario (SSP1) is also a future in which deforestation comes to an end – and instead we see substantial reforestation and much more space for the wildlife on our planet.

[this paper on the SSPs is very helpful
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…]
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!