In class, I draw a direct connection to Lothrop Stoddard's 1920 book "Rising Tide of Color"
In his excellent write up on the AFC document, @KevinMKruse also references Stoddard. That's not surprising, as the AFC platform is definitely hearkening back to the white nationalism of the 1920s. msnbc.com/opinion/gop-s-…
Typical of a platform document, it's basically a list of policy issues, with short write ups on each.
Example: here is the part on removing power from the federal government -- which, should be noted, was what the Confederate states claimed as the true issue of the Civil War
It is notable that the longest sections of the document are about immigration (which is where the phrase `Anglo-Saxon' is used)...
...and trade
On the trade section, I'm impressed they name dropped David Ricardo and referenced "Comparative Advantage".
But let's be honest: saying that wealth is moving to the "Western Pacific" away from the "North Atlantic" is another way of saying "from white people to not-white people"
Hence, both the trade & immigration sections are centered on the same idea: US `white culture' (i.e. Anglo-Saxon/North Atlantic) is threatened by the "outside world" due to economic forces (i.e. globalization)
Near the end of his career, Huntington himself didn't shy away from making similar claims amazon.com/Who-Are-We-Cha…
To be clear: not everyone who criticizes the displacements caused by globalization is a white nationalist. Far from it. foreignaffairs.com/articles/world…
Also, anti-globalization backlash is not unique to the US. For instance, this is a key reason for the rise of border walls GLOBALLY over the past 30 years journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
But such displacements have historically created fodder for white-nationalist groups in the US. See the Kruse piece above and @carolmswain's book from 2002 amazon.com/New-White-Nati…
Did the AFC platform authors actually read Huntington?
🤷♂️
But his ideas permeate the document.
[END]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Before diving into the paper's specific claim, a few prefacing points.
First, to make sure we're all on the same page, the democratic peace is the claim that democracies rarely fight one another. The below thread covers the history of this "empirical law", reviewing work that I cover in my "Quantitative Security" course
Have questions about the new "Jan 6 Capitol Attacks" study by my @CPOST_UChicago colleagues? Please see their slide deck laying out the methodology and analysis:
People around the world will reflect today on the meaning of empire, rivalry, COIN tactics, and buffer states.
I'm of course referring to hearing the Passion account during Good Friday services.
[THREAD]
Just to make sure we're on the same page, the Passion account is the narrative in the New Testament Gospels (such as Mark, linked below) describing the trial and execution of Jesus of Nazareth.
For Christians, it (and the aftermath -- i.e. Easter) is central to their faith. How central? A New Testament scholar once said something to the effect of "The gospels are just passion accounts with prologues"
(maybe @BartEhrman can help me recall the exact quote)
Much work in International political economy (IPE) & International Economics discusses two extreme forms of disruption to the flows of goods & services in the global economy.