The "Ever Given" has indeed given: not just memes, but a teachable moment.

Let's explain why the global economy is extremely fragile.

[THREAD]
The @nytimes just ran a story on this very issue

nytimes.com/2021/03/26/bus…
Much work in International political economy (IPE) & International Economics discusses two extreme forms of disruption to the flows of goods & services in the global economy.
On the one end, IPE focuses a lot on policy restrictions -- tariffs or non-tariff barrier regulations -- and how these come about (i.e. interest group pressure; firm interests).

Two recent examples include...
On the other end, #COVID19 shows how an extreme global shock can bring the the global economy to a virtual halt.

For example, see...
...this new @voxeu paper by Natalia Martín Fuentes & Isabella Moder (both of the @ecb)...

voxeu.org/article/scarri…
...or this Emerging Markets Finance and Trade paper by C.T. Vidya & K.P. Prabheesh (@IITHyderabad)

tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
In contrast to these two extremes, the Ever Given debacle shows that there is a more fundamental fragility to the global economy: small shocks that can bring down the whole thing.
This fragility is inherent to the networked nature of the global economy: supply chains, shipping routes, inter-firm trade.

This is a big theme in @thoatley's work. See...
These networks create the potential for "small" (sometimes seemingly random events) to have huge global economic consequences.

Think of the refinery fire last year in Louisiana

dallasnews.com/business/energ…
Here's the thing. Governments know this. And they can leverage it.

This goes to the heart of what @ANewman_forward & @henryfarrell call "Weaponized Interdependence"
belfercenter.org/publication/we…
A good example of this process was (and is) 5G internet development and access
globalasia.org/v14no3/cover/w…
Indeed, the fragility of the global economy is not new.

Consider how a key focus of the @USNavy is to keep open "choke points" (one of which is the Suez Canal): narrow maritime passageways through which cargo ships must travel.
IR scholars have written on how governments could seek to disrupt the global economy by closing off one of these choke points (see @ProfTalmadge in @Journal_IS)...

belfercenter.org/publication/cl…
... and why pirates are a threat
tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
Which, of course, brings us back to Suez and the Ever Given. While this wasn't a case of piracy or a government blocking the choke point, it illustrates how it doesn't take much to accomplish that aim.
A cruiser or two could do the trick...or, in the case of the Bosphorus strait, a really long chain
In sum, the shipping debacle in the Suez provides a great lesson on the inherent fragility of the global economy (and how governments can exploit it). Oh, and a source for great memes 👇

[END]
Addendum 1: While the above thread highlights the fragility of the global economy, worth noting that this can be a short-term problem.

Longer term, adjustments can be made.

That appears to be the case in this specific instance...

wsj.com/articles/compa…
... and can be a feature of many global markets, such as the market for rare earth metals today (explored by Eugene Gholz and @LlewelynHughes recently in @RIPEJournal)...

tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
...or (in one of my favorite examples) the 19th century market for cotton.
smithsonianmag.com/history/how-am…
So the global economy is not fragile in the "it will all permanently vanish"-sense

But it is fragile in the "one small thing creates a huge mess costing lots of folks globally a lot of money"-sense

And THAT second type of fragility could be exploited by governments.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Poast

Paul Poast Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfPaulPoast

23 Mar
Should @NATO reorient itself to counter 🇨🇳, as recommended recently by @sb_moller?

As it turns out, doing so is consistent with the original vision of the "Atlantic Pact".

[THREAD]
washingtonpost.com/outlook/chinas…
Consider three aspects of how the "Atlantic Pact" was viewed when originally negotiated.
First, it was recognized that the alliance could have a reach outside of Europe -- potentially as far as China.
Read 23 tweets
20 Mar
Should Americans be concerned about the US National Debt?

As I tell my students: No.

[THREAD]
This thread is inspired by seeing, in the wake of the $1.9 Trillion stimulus bill, much fretting over the size of the national debt.

But as @mcopelov has emphasized time and time again: such concerns are largely misplaced

Read 31 tweets
17 Mar
How much does 🇺🇸 spend on defense compared to the rest of 🌏?

That's a hard question to answer. For starters, we don't precisely know how much 🇺🇸 spends on defense (& that's the easy part).

[THREAD]
This thread is inspired by a debate several folks were having recently about comparing US defense spending to that of other countries
So how much does the US spend on defense?

One might think this is simply a budgeting and accounting exercise. That's part of it, but it's actually a conceptual exercise: what do we mean by "defense" or "national security"

jstor.org/stable/2145138…
Read 18 tweets
10 Mar
Why did the US invade Iraq in 2003?

Retaliation for 9/11? A demonstration of US power? Saddam Hussein was a threat? Bush had a personal vendetta to settle? A mistake? All of the above?

The reality is that we don't know.

[THREAD]
This thread is partly motivated by what @_danigilbert recently observed

To start, let's give some background and review the war's lead-up.
Read 53 tweets
6 Mar
The @WhiteHouse released an "Interim National Security Strategic Guidance" this week. After reading it, I'm sure international relations scholars will go.....hmmmmmm 🤔

[THREAD]

whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
Don't get me wrong. I agree with @MatthewKroenig that releasing this document is a good thing: folks are anxious to know more about what "America is Back" means. This document offers some...well..."guidance" (hence the name)

And given how early it is being released (for example, 2017 NSS wasn't released until December of Trump's first year) sends a useful signal about intentions

Read 32 tweets
27 Feb
Possible 🇺🇸 arms sales restrictions on 🇸🇦 raises a question: Is there such a thing as a "defensive weapon"? Can some weapons ONLY be used to STOP attacks?

International Relations scholars are (mostly) unanimous: No

[THREAD]
reuters.com/article/usa-sa…
To be clear, it is possible that a weapon will only be USED to stop attacks, not attack others.

After all, that's the heart of "self-defense" clause in Article 51 of the UN Charter

legal.un.org/repertory/art5…
Also, it is possible that a state's military will have a "defensive strategy" -- i.e. non-expansionist -- rather than an "offensive strategy" -- i.e. expansionist.

Indeed, that is a core part of the theory in my book "Arguing About Alliances"
cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/978150174…
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!