Versions of Ramayana before 12th century @Faizanazizi (left accepted dates):
1) Kamba Ramayana, 12th Century (Tamil) 2) Yoga Vashishtha, (4th Century BC or 5th Century AD) 3) Vasudevahindi, 4th Century AD 4) Dasagriva Raksasa Charitam Vardham (6th Century AD)
23) Prasana-Raghava of Jayadeva (12th century) 24) Raghu-vilasa of Ramachandra (12th cen) 25) Raghavabhyudaya of Ramachandra (12th cen) 26) Janaki-Raghava (12th cen) 27) Rama-vikrama (12th century)
Well Shri @Faizanazizi you also asked about foreign language versions before 12th century. Below are places of Ramayana in Chines texts:
A) 3rd Century, Sambuka Jataka
B) 6th Century, in Biography of Vasubandhu
C) Buddhacarita (5th Cen)
Since you are talking of Ramayana in response to a verse for Vishnu Puran
& then say that I’m giving half information you are making yourself a laughing stock.
In Ramayana while Killing of Tadka is justified Bharat does object slaying of Manthara when Shatrughan asks.
3/n We have various parts of RigVeda compiled by Rishikas (female Rishis). Justice Nariman must be told by somebody that as per the latest researches RigVeda was conceived at millenniums before the alleged birth of Jesus.
Ashoka has been one of the worst emperors of India. He massacred many in name of religion.
Since you name Ambedkar, you must know that he said: Islam “killed” Buddhism in India.
“Killed” is key.
What can be bigger shame @TawhidWarrior than this that Ambedkar who once wanted to convert to Islam initially chooses to call it more horrible than Islam & chose not to convert.
It does not matter which period I chose, the saga of atrocities on ancestors gives immense pain.
The power packed attack on our civilization's ethos still continues.
Often it becomes too challenging to type down those sagas.
Fingers tremble as I capture them in words.
There are so many. The attack of Turks, Turko-Mongols, the Portuguese, the Dutch, Huns.
When we had world's best education system, existence of democracy, pursuance of "Science, Mathematics, Philosophy, Astronomy etc etc," they were busy establishing supremacy of new prophets in markets of various regions.
1)I said the point of law. Why you are supposed to kill cow in land where it’s prohibited? It’s not about what’s important & what not. By that logic Quran is damn garbage for we Hindus, so , why not appealing against beheadings?
2) We Hindus tolerated Namaaz on streets for so many years but you have problem not accepting to kill our sacred ones?
3)So yes as far as Asifs case is concerned, first please explain why he went inside Mandir if two water points were already there outside?
3)Have you cared to research why people resort to beating Asif ? No, here urinating in temples isn’t important, right? Why action isn’t imp but reaction?
4)@YawarNazirMir ever cared to condemn @KhanAmanatullah for calling beheading?
1) It’s my stand so I will chose whom I speak about. 2) My countrymen will certainly have preference in my narrative over outsiders. I won’t let thieves take undue advantage of brawls of my home.
3)I do talk of Ashoka’s disastrous massacres. Can u begin with Md (if he existed)?
More here @YawarNazirMir
4)In modern times,Islam brings max troubles,Ahmadiya know it better.
5)since u acknowledge that forced conversion happened, don’t you think there was prob with fundamentals of Islam?
6)Which country is more secured for Ahmadiyas than Hindu Maj India?
7) dear @YawarNazirMir don’t try to defame the faith which has been most tolerant & now sees max threats from all Corners. 8) If instances of urinating in temples, killing of Hindus in BD for Modi’s visit doesn’t trouble u then Ahmadiya love for all is fake.