Union jobs lead to better wages—not just for unionized workers, but for the entire working class.
@EconomicPolicy has a must-read new report showing the erosion of collective bargaining has been costing working people money for forty years.
The share of workers covered by a union contract fell from 27.0% in 1979 to just 11.6% in 2019.
The declining unionization rate translates to a loss of $1.56 per hour worked, the equivalent of $3,250 for a full-time, full-year worker. epi.org/publication/er…
Unions built the middle class by raising the wages of all workers.
The declining rate of unionization in the past 40 years is directly correlated with the collapse of the middle class.
"Unions have disproportionately benefited Black and Latino workers, workers with low and moderate wage levels and lower levels of education since as far back as the 1940s."
Unions do the most to help disadvantaged workers who have the least power on their own.
Unions help raise the wage of non-union workers through "spillover effects."
Once unions establish a good wage in a given industry, profession, or area, the prevailing wage increases. Unions make it easier for other workers to demand higher wages.
The loss of union jobs has a negative impact on the wages of all workers.
The loss of union jobs is most impactful to the wages of Black and Latino workers, low and moderate income workers, and the less educated.
Being anti-union is racist.
In the era from the end of WWII until the 1970s, unions “[were] a powerful force for equalizing the income distribution.”
As the number of union jobs declined, so did the middle class.
How did we lose so many good union jobs?
"The primary reason was a concerted corporate attack on unions, starting in the 1970s, that exploited weaknesses in our labor laws to suppress the ability of workers to choose collective bargaining and organize."
The percentage of workers who want to join a union hasn't decreased since the highpoint of unionization in the 1970s.
"This collapse of [union] organizing was due to increased employer aggressiveness and use of both legal and illegal tactics."
As we showed in the Bessemer, AL union election at an Amazon warehouse, corporate America can get away with intimidating, threatening, and coercing workers to vote against a union.
And it's costing working people everywhere thousands of dollars per year.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BREAKING: @AOC and @EdMarkey just introduced The Civilian Climate Corps Act of 2021.
The program expands President Biden's American Jobs Plan to provide an additional 1.5 million Americans with jobs fixing the climate crisis that pay at least $15/hr.
America’s courts are stacked in favor of corporations.
If we’re going to save it, we need judges who’ve represented real people, not corporations.
@POTUS needs to name public interest lawyers to the federal bench, as @brianefallon explains.
Nearly 60% of circuit court judges were corporate law firm partners, as of 2019.
Judges with corporate backgrounds and prosecutors are more likely to rule against workers in employment lawsuits. demandjustice.org/wp-content/upl…
Since John Roberts—a former corporate lawyer—became chief justice in 2005, the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Chamber of Commerce 70% of the time.
EXCLUSIVE: More Perfect Union has obtained a sweeping 150-page draft GOP voter suppression bill that would severely restrict voting in Ohio.
The legislation includes provisions that are even more radical than Georgia's new voting laws, which have spurred a national backlash.
The new Ohio voter suppression bill would:
- Require voters to provide *two* forms of ID to vote absentee or early
- Create different ID rules for mail and early in-person voting
- Eliminate ALL ballot drop boxes
- Cut the most popular day of early voting
- Ban pre-paid postage
Ohio already has some of the most restrictive voting laws and is one of the most gerrymandered states.
It has purged 2 million voters since 2012 and significantly depressed minority turnout.
These measures will further target low-income voters, young people & people of color.
NEW: Police and sheriffs in Minnesota have been paid more than $500,000 by a foreign corporation, Enbridge Energy, while they surveilled & harassed Indigenous activists opposing the Line 3 pipeline.
The payments came via an escrow account overseen by an ex-deputy police chief.
Enbridge, a Canadian corporation responsible for the largest-ever U.S. inland oil spill, is now building a massive tar sands pipeline through pristine wetland and Indigenous land in Minnesota.
Enbridge's construction permit established an escrow account that the company uses to pay Minnesota law enforcement for any activity related to the pipeline, including "Public safety related costs for maintaining the peace in and around the construction site."
Today, Jeff Bezos released a letter to Amazon shareholders defending the company against accusations that it's bad for employees, small businesses and the environment.