We work together at a company with 135K other people. For some reason, they've asked me to write this instead of people who are directly familiar with the quality of their work.
Fear not! I've conducted diligence and searched news.google.com to validate that they're not publicly accused of atrocities. I've also punched their name into Twitter's search and found nothing notable there either.
You might wonder how I can confidently recommend them. First, look at where they work. The "our employee used to work here" is a badge of honor for some folks.
Second, excellence is situational. Even if they were utter crap here, they might be golden at your shop.
And lastly, the fact that you're reading this at all means that you weigh the value of candidate-provided references more heavily than you should.
"Can you give me three people who will sing your praises" is what you're saying with references. I won't save you from yourself.
In conclusion, they're probably fine. But should it turn out that they have no clue what they're doing, it's apparent that they'll be in good company at your company.
Nobody ever got asked to apologize for referring a crap candidate,
Corey
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In an effort to broaden my mass-market appeal, I will attempt to livetweet today's #AppleEvent in this thread in something approaching my usual keynote livetweet style.
My tweet threads are to "shitposting" as Macbooks are to "laptops;" both involve garbage and the keyboard.
The best #AppleEvent streaming experience is on Apple devices using Safari. Other browsers "may be able to access the stream" but I've seen enough of these to recognize a "go fuck yourself" when I see one.
The "Audio descriptions" are hilarious. It's trying to explain what's happening. "A blue line swoops in from the top right and then the lower left, then swoops up back to the left. A thick yellow line moves up from the left and become slight green."
Nice: Oracle Cloud is technically excellent and doesn't get enough attention for what it does well.
Nasty: It's a heavy, heavy lift to recommend it for greenfield projects just because "you should use Oracle" sounds like terrible advice without heavy contextual bounding.
So far it's universally positive, but the AWS folks need to finish being furious and stop seeing red long enough to work their keyboards to yell at me.