op-ed on 15 minute cities, after seeing so many US mayors and planners try and water down by removing density, radical mixing and open space, and solidarity.
another op-ed for treehugger further highlighting growing disparity between US AEC industry, and the rest of the world - especially on energy efficiency
Thingy i did for @Sightline on the history of land use in seattle, and how continual downzones and other land use regs at behest of homeowners exacerbated housing crisis
was asked by @CityObs a few years ago to write about vienna and it's phenomenal social housing and land use, and how it could be a model for seattle and the US
not an op-ed per se - but in 2018, almost a year to the day before i moved to bayern, @archinect sessions podcast on zoning/land use, building materials, passivhaus, etc
a lot of ones i've repeatedly gone back to over the years, it's short but i think my piece on neue heimat tirol as a model for a (innovative, passivhaus-friendly, counter-cyclical) social housing provider in seattle is a personal fave. also my 1st there theurbanist.org/2014/04/07/cit…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
it's interesting to me, that in my @Treehugger piece on how bad the US architecture and construction industries are - everyone latches on to the single stair issue.
it really brings out the most amazing comments, and it's something i've been meaning to talk about for a while, so here's a little thread on the topic.
european cities are *laden* with pre-war buildings that contain only a single means of egress, like this one. many don't even have elevators. there are a number of reasons for this.
attended a happy hour work thing and everyone was surprised i had worked abroad, been on a panel at @SPUR_Urbanist, spoken internationally on mass timber, passivhaus, and baugruppen.
like did you even look at my resume? apparently not.
explains a lot!
the SPUR event was fun and piggybacked on a talk at @naphnetwork - got to learn about what @JonDishotsky was doing at starcity, and have the grand dame of cohousing in the US tell me to stop using the word 'baugruppe' 🤣
our brand new almost passivhaus 3 BR maisonette in a 4-plex was 1/3 rent of townhouse in seattle.
daycare was 1/12th cost v. seattle
dining out w/ tip and drinks was half as much or less.
travel: cheap, green and easy v. seattle
can't take a train to go skiing in seattle. hell you can barely take a train to get to vancouver BC. and it's slow, very infrequent and sometimes cancelled.
new development in seattle v. new development in stuttgart
spot the differences
seattle: 1. no sense of community 2. no private outdoor space not observable by neighbors 3. auto-oriented despite 1 block from decent transit 4. not accessible 5. not affordable 6. no diversity in unit size or type 7. poor design 8. setbacks and driveway make for sh*t urbanism
seattle (cont'd) 9. built to bare minimum 10. poor sound protection 11. few to no eyes on the street 12. no place for kids to play 13. little privacy 14. virtually no open space on site
they're not made in the US. they're manufactured in places notorious for conservative industries, but that are adopting stringent energy codes - like germany, austria.
i've been thinking a lot about CLT floors of late.
i've always struggled a bit with how we do it here - thin floor plates w/ CLT panels, and it hit me in a discussion w. hundegger's wolfgang piatke - the US puts CLT in floors, the EU puts CLT in walls
and it's not just that we put CLT in floors - we also do it wrong.
in the US, nearly everyone is trying to do the thinnest floor plate they can w/ CLT. they do this by adding a layer of acoustic insulation and a concrete or gypcrete topping.
this sets up a couple of issues
1. the approach is not the best from an acoustic standpoint. yes, it can meet the bare minimum of the code, but performance isn't ideal.