Thread -
Shallow understanding of @VedicWisdom1 on शूद्र and duties.
His claim : कृषि (Farming) is NOT work of शूद्र. This is FALSE.
Responsibilities/Duties of शूद्र are
शूद्रस्य द्विजातिशुश्रूषा वार्त्ता कारुकुशीलवकर्म च ।
#अर्थशास्त्रम् (1.3.8). See image. (1)
Shallow understanding of @VedicWisdom1 on शूद्र and duties.
His claim : कृषि (Farming) is NOT work of शूद्र. This is FALSE.
Responsibilities/Duties of शूद्र are
शूद्रस्य द्विजातिशुश्रूषा वार्त्ता कारुकुशीलवकर्म च ।
#अर्थशास्त्रम् (1.3.8). See image. (1)
https://twitter.com/VedicWisdom1/status/1384372630736703494
(2)
Where is कृषि here ? It is in वार्त्ता (Economical activities).
कृषिपाशुपाल्ये वणिज्या च वार्त्ता ।
#अर्थशास्त्रम् (1.4.1)
कृषि (Farming), पशुपालन (Cattles), वाणिज्य (Trade).
So, farming is also work of शूद्र.
Where is कृषि here ? It is in वार्त्ता (Economical activities).
कृषिपाशुपाल्ये वणिज्या च वार्त्ता ।
#अर्थशास्त्रम् (1.4.1)
कृषि (Farming), पशुपालन (Cattles), वाणिज्य (Trade).
So, farming is also work of शूद्र.
(3)
Another FALSE propaganda to demean शूद्र (image 1).
Reality (image 2) - Explanation of 1st & 2nd tweets. शूद्र can do all activities related to economics as well as कारुकुशीलवकर्म (Performing/ non performing arts).
This person doesn't know any शास्त्र. Don't belive him.
Another FALSE propaganda to demean शूद्र (image 1).
Reality (image 2) - Explanation of 1st & 2nd tweets. शूद्र can do all activities related to economics as well as कारुकुशीलवकर्म (Performing/ non performing arts).
This person doesn't know any शास्त्र. Don't belive him.
(4)
Pls note that #अर्थशास्त्रम् is in line with #मनुस्मृतिः on social structure of ancient India.
If anybody claims both texts differ is baseless. No such evidence.
Limited reading of people w/o know how of शास्त्र is dangerous.
Read the full article
vyasonmukh.in/2021/01/12/sva…
Pls note that #अर्थशास्त्रम् is in line with #मनुस्मृतिः on social structure of ancient India.
If anybody claims both texts differ is baseless. No such evidence.
Limited reading of people w/o know how of शास्त्र is dangerous.
Read the full article
vyasonmukh.in/2021/01/12/sva…
(5) Adding @Vedic_Revival 's tweet on the same subject 👇
https://twitter.com/Vedic_Revival/status/1382766248988176384?s=19
(6)
What an audacity insulting शूद्र !
शूद्र was responsible for driving/controling/sustaining economy and this ignorant says them ignorant ! 😇
This is an insult of entire शूद्र community.
What an audacity insulting शूद्र !
शूद्र was responsible for driving/controling/sustaining economy and this ignorant says them ignorant ! 😇
This is an insult of entire शूद्र community.
https://twitter.com/VedicWisdom1/status/1384343574205005834?s=19
(7) More insult to शूद्र by twisting/misinterpreting the words of मनु.
शूद्र is a slave as per this propaganda. Irony is - slave concept was not present in ancient #India.
People devoid of common sense are commenting on #धर्मशास्त्रम् 🤦🏻♂️
शूद्र is a slave as per this propaganda. Irony is - slave concept was not present in ancient #India.
People devoid of common sense are commenting on #धर्मशास्त्रम् 🤦🏻♂️
https://twitter.com/VedicWisdom1/status/1382767819671015424?s=19
(8) Adding @SaffronVaibhav 's tweet where explanation from Shankaracharya is given.
This गुणकर्मविभागशः is the most misunderstood and maligned verse by anti Hindus.
This गुणकर्मविभागशः is the most misunderstood and maligned verse by anti Hindus.
https://twitter.com/SaffronVaibhav/status/1384365608939102208?s=19
(9) Adding tweet of @bhriguvanshi1 where the same explanation of #भगवद्गीता 4.13 is given in detail.
Don't fall for any propaganda. All शास्त्र are very clear and on the same page. शूद्र is NEVER insulted by them.
Don't fall for any propaganda. All शास्त्र are very clear and on the same page. शूद्र is NEVER insulted by them.
https://twitter.com/bhriguvanshi1/status/1384374034352140289?s=19
(10)
U must know अभिधा (Direct meaning), लक्षणा (Implied meaning) and व्यंजना (Suggested meaning).
Taking only direct meaning is a sign of an ignorant.
Do u hv any प्रमाण that ब्राह्मण gets converted to शूद्र in 3 days ? Does magic happen ? @RituRathaur
U must know अभिधा (Direct meaning), लक्षणा (Implied meaning) and व्यंजना (Suggested meaning).
Taking only direct meaning is a sign of an ignorant.
Do u hv any प्रमाण that ब्राह्मण gets converted to शूद्र in 3 days ? Does magic happen ? @RituRathaur
https://twitter.com/VedicWisdom1/status/1384408451044966402?s=19
(11)
शास्त्रवचन has all three meanings but which one is applicable is only known to the अध्येता and गुरु.
This is why anybody can not interpret शास्त्र and if he does so, श्रीकृष्ण has warned in #भगवद्गीता
शास्त्रवचन has all three meanings but which one is applicable is only known to the अध्येता and गुरु.
This is why anybody can not interpret शास्त्र and if he does so, श्रीकृष्ण has warned in #भगवद्गीता
(12) Adding another thread where his अशास्त्रीय "वर्ण by कर्म" agenda is debunked.
Nowhere this guy applies logic. Only selective quoting and ranting his own belief.
This is why he is not taken seriously by any Aacharya/scholar of Sanskrit.
Nowhere this guy applies logic. Only selective quoting and ranting his own belief.
This is why he is not taken seriously by any Aacharya/scholar of Sanskrit.
https://twitter.com/Vyasonmukh/status/1377960332681912327?s=19
(13) स्वभाव of Jabala was of ब्राह्मण. It is because of his संचितकर्म of past birth, not the current birth. This is why he spoke truth. This is how he was identified as ब्राह्मण.
Rejecting birth means you don't know basics and still paddling agenda.
Rejecting birth means you don't know basics and still paddling agenda.
https://twitter.com/VedicWisdom1/status/1384339777252560901?s=19
(14)
Typical Aryasamaji ranting (pic 1).
This मूर्ख @VedicWisdom1 wants everything at one place in the शास्त्र. Is it possible to have everything in just one verse ?
In pic 2, Shankaracharya ji is giving explanation how to understand such concepts by various linkages.
Typical Aryasamaji ranting (pic 1).
This मूर्ख @VedicWisdom1 wants everything at one place in the शास्त्र. Is it possible to have everything in just one verse ?
In pic 2, Shankaracharya ji is giving explanation how to understand such concepts by various linkages.
(15)
Good find from #चाणक्यनीतिः on स्वभाव. It is in line with शास्त्र. Only an idiot like @VedicWisdom1 and his gang can't understand. 👇
Good find from #चाणक्यनीतिः on स्वभाव. It is in line with शास्त्र. Only an idiot like @VedicWisdom1 and his gang can't understand. 👇
https://twitter.com/bhriguvanshi1/status/1384200182032523266?s=19
(16)
रामानुजाचार्य defines स्वभाव in his भाष्य. No difference. जडमति @VedicWisdom1 doesn't know basics. Poor guy.
👇
रामानुजाचार्य defines स्वभाव in his भाष्य. No difference. जडमति @VedicWisdom1 doesn't know basics. Poor guy.
👇
https://twitter.com/bhriguvanshi1/status/1384522237546356737?s=19
(17) In connection to 10th tweet, I warned this मूढमति @VedicWisdom1 to not to take the meaning literally.
Kulluka Bhatta (Commentator #मनुस्मृतिः) says ब्राह्मण becomes शूद्रतुल्य, not शूद्र
Moral - वर्ण can't be changed in same birth.
@RituRathaur
Kulluka Bhatta (Commentator #मनुस्मृतिः) says ब्राह्मण becomes शूद्रतुल्य, not शूद्र
Moral - वर्ण can't be changed in same birth.
@RituRathaur
https://twitter.com/VedicWisdom1/status/1384408451044966402?s=19
(18) Same way, no need to reject भविष्यपुराण and दक्षस्मृति. Everywhere the context is same - वर्ण can't be changed in same birth.
Problem with you @VedicWisdom1 is - You do selective quoting and taking only literal meaning.
This proves, u don't understand #Sanskrit.
Problem with you @VedicWisdom1 is - You do selective quoting and taking only literal meaning.
This proves, u don't understand #Sanskrit.
(19) let us see, who is this @VedicWisdom1 ?
He may be a sleeper cell of anti Hindu/शास्त्र gang @/StringReveals. See the below quoted tweet and scroll down.
They are building ecosystem to take the narrative in their hand. This is a big nexus. 👇
He may be a sleeper cell of anti Hindu/शास्त्र gang @/StringReveals. See the below quoted tweet and scroll down.
They are building ecosystem to take the narrative in their hand. This is a big nexus. 👇
https://twitter.com/Vyasonmukh/status/1383865448345731086?s=19
(20) String team is taking information from his blog (see image).
Why from his blog only ?
Because agenda is same and both are on same page.
Goal is also common - Present the distorted/maligned image of शास्त्र and misguide the mass as much as possible.
Why from his blog only ?
Because agenda is same and both are on same page.
Goal is also common - Present the distorted/maligned image of शास्त्र and misguide the mass as much as possible.
(21) Some of his team members whose "anti traditional" tweets are RTd by him. He is promoting them too. This is just an example. There are many such cases.
Big sleeper cell is promoting medium/small cells. A standard technique. 👇
Big sleeper cell is promoting medium/small cells. A standard technique. 👇
https://twitter.com/Vyasonmukh/status/1383867702012309504?s=19
(22)
Below thread mentions some shocking anti Hindu and anti tradition thinking of @VedicWisdom1. It shows this person doesn't hv any moral right to speak anything on शास्त्र.
He is planted by some gang to confuse Hindus. 👇
Below thread mentions some shocking anti Hindu and anti tradition thinking of @VedicWisdom1. It shows this person doesn't hv any moral right to speak anything on शास्त्र.
He is planted by some gang to confuse Hindus. 👇
https://twitter.com/Vyasonmukh/status/1392078805175443459?s=19
(23)
Here this clown treating पारिभाषिक word माया as illusion. See the quoted tweets where many people have provided correct understanding of word माया directly from भाष्य.
W/o having basic knowledge of Sanskrit, he is paddling nonsense. 👇
Here this clown treating पारिभाषिक word माया as illusion. See the quoted tweets where many people have provided correct understanding of word माया directly from भाष्य.
W/o having basic knowledge of Sanskrit, he is paddling nonsense. 👇
https://twitter.com/VedicWisdom1/status/1375413796794028032?s=19
(24) Here, this fraud @VedicWisdom1 declares रावण as क्षत्रिय and insult entire क्षत्रिय community.
Neither Valmiki nor any commentator/scholar has said so in #रामायणम्.
What this shows ? He doesn't have knowledge of Sanskrit and tradition both. 👇
Neither Valmiki nor any commentator/scholar has said so in #रामायणम्.
What this shows ? He doesn't have knowledge of Sanskrit and tradition both. 👇
https://twitter.com/VedicWisdom1/status/1378890039527043072?s=19
(25) Understanding Sanskrit also needs basic sense. If somebody doesn't possess it and also doesn't listen others then he is मूर्ख indeed. 👇
https://twitter.com/Vyasonmukh/status/1378977338621263872?s=19
(26) Here @vedaechoesji has exposed Aryasamaji @VedicWisdom1 on his poor understanding of अश्वमेध यज्ञ with शास्त्र प्रमाण. Understand and contemplate. 👇
https://twitter.com/vedaechoesji/status/1402673858415521795?s=19
(27) Another thread by @vedaechoesji on similar topic (वैदिक यज्ञ) where he beautifully explains how to understand the context with various प्रमाण. Here also, @VedicWisdom1 (PDF expert) gets exposed. 👇
https://twitter.com/vedaechoesji/status/1403033308141740035?s=19
(28) Understanding वैदिक संस्कृत is not possible w/o studying under a proper source (Guru etc.).
Here, @vedaechoesji exposing this PDF expert's alt @SanatKumaara. See all quoted tweets.
It shows why force fitting of meaning is not possible in Vedas 👇.
Here, @vedaechoesji exposing this PDF expert's alt @SanatKumaara. See all quoted tweets.
It shows why force fitting of meaning is not possible in Vedas 👇.
https://twitter.com/vedaechoesji/status/1403050864365903872?s=19
(29) Thread on shallow understanding of PDF expert @VedicWisdom1 on the concept of वर्णसंकर used in #भगवद्गीता and #मनुस्मृतिः 👇
https://twitter.com/Vyasonmukh/status/1398609060899876869?s=19
(30) PDF copy paste expert @VedicWisdom1 is exposed on his shallow understanding on शास्त्रीय concepts like माया and अवतार in this scholarly thread by @vedaechoesji
Just by reading translation, you can't understand पारिभाषिक words. 👇
Just by reading translation, you can't understand पारिभाषिक words. 👇
https://twitter.com/vedaechoesji/status/1403400361767890946?s=19
(31) Adding one more nonsense of @VedicWisdom1 on शब्द प्रमाण. In supporting Sanjay Dixit, once more he is going against authorities/शास्त्र. 👇
https://twitter.com/Vyasonmukh/status/1416775352278417408?s=19
(32) #मनुस्मृतिः 5.15 says don't eat fish (general rule) but 5.16 gives permission to eat the fish, if offered in यज्ञ/पितृ etc.
Commentators (Kullukabhatta & Medhatithi) both are on same page (Image).
One more nonsense of @VedicWisdom1 refuted here 👇
Commentators (Kullukabhatta & Medhatithi) both are on same page (Image).
One more nonsense of @VedicWisdom1 refuted here 👇
https://twitter.com/HinduHistory108/status/1439261848231047171?s=19
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
