1/ The @nytimes has a good interactive story on the safety of flying during the pandemic, but they didn’t discuss boarding & deboarding. Judging by CO2 readings I saw on recent flights, this is the most dangerous part of flying. #covidco2 #COVIDisairborne
nytimes.com/interactive/20…
2/ By now there is overwhelming evidence #COVIDisAirborne. It’s transmitted mainly by shared air, i.e. inhaling the air others have exhaled, which contain aerosols—tiny, liquid particles that float suspended in air for seconds to hours, depending on size.
3/ There’s no easy way to measure virus levels in the air, but CO2 is a good proxy measure of risk. Outdoor CO2 levels are ~410 ppm, but since we exhale CO2, indoor concentrations are higher. The higher the CO2 level, the more air you’re sharing.
4/ I used an Aranet CO2 meter, which was tested & recommended by @jljcolorado, a top aerosol expert. I flew from Ft. Wayne, IN (FWA), to Rochester, MN (RST) with a layover at Chicago. FWA was not busy, & the CO2 ranged from 516 to 546 ppm.
5/ When we first sat down on the plane, the CO2 level was at 1424. Four minutes later, it was 1470. Over the course of the next 6 minutes, the CO2 concentration rose steadily.
6/ In the next four minutes, the CO2 level rose from 1654 ppm to 1899 to 2027 to 2255. Most IAQ experts, including @linseymarr, recommend keeping CO2 below 700 for a multitude of reasons.
7/ The next two pictures are quite blurry because the plane started to move, but you can tell the CO2 rose to 2343, then 2351 ppm.
8/ I think the ventilation system started bringing in outdoor air when the plane began taxiing but that it took a couple minutes for the CO2 to begin to decline. Two minutes after peaking at 2351 ppm, it had decreased to 2026, and two minutes after that it was 1738.
9/ By the time we took off the CO2 was around 1400 ppm, and it stayed right around that level for the entire flight.
10/ Chicago’s O’Hare Airport appeared to have quite good ventilation. The CO2 level stayed in the low-600 range where I was. I did not venture into the crowded cafeteria area nearby, where I imagine the levels were significantly higher.
11/ The next flight was to Rochester, MN, also on American Airlines. Immediately after boarding, the CO2 was already at 2096 ppm.
12/ Five minutes later, the CO2 concentration had risen to 2393 ppm, and in the next two minutes it rose further, to 2548 before peaking at 2650 ppm.
13/ At this point there was a revving noise, and CO2 levels started to decline, falling to 1820 ppm seven minutes later. 20 minutes after the peak 2650 reading, CO2 had declined to 1292 when we started taxiing.
14/ After taxiing for several minutes, we stopped. CO2 once again rose, but only to 1546, after which the plane started rolling again and levels declined.
15/ During this flight, which seemed equally crowded as the first flight and on a similarly small plane, CO2 concentrations were lower, ranging between 900-1030 ppm. Notably, relative humidity got as low as 12% later on in the flight.
16/ The Rochester Airport wasn’t very crowded, but with CO2 at 492 ppm, it still must have had good ventilation. Doors about 10 meters away likely helped.
17/ I’ll stop there for now. Later I’ll add info about the CO2 levels at Mayo Clinic and our hotel. Our return flights, again with a layover at O’Hare, are later today, and it will be interesting to see how they compare.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ryan Hisner

Ryan Hisner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LongDesertTrain

17 Apr
Still quite a bit of uncertainty about this new Indian variant, but this much at least seems clear: as transmission continues unabated, allowing the virus limitless opportunities to mutate, the variants emerging dominant are invariably worse, not better, than what came before.
As B.1.1.7 spread and became dominant in country after country, it eventually became clear that it was not only more contagious but also ~60-70% more deadly than older variants.
When B.1.351 (the S. African variant) was studied, it was found to evade neutralizing antibodies from the serum of both vaccinated & previously infected individuals & seemed to infect previously infected people as easily as those never previously infected. fda.gov/media/144245/d…
Read 8 tweets
7 Apr
Facebook censorship is out of control. In the past 10 days I've had 4 comments removed for "violating community standards." All were Covid related, & I have no idea why they were suppressed. Perhaps someone here can figure it out. Here's a censored comment from yesterday. Image
The comment above was (I think) on the superb Hoosier Covid Update page, run by the estimable & amiable @gbosslet. The two below were on a friend's page, which was not public but only viewable to his friends. They were supposedly flagged as spam, though I cannot fathom why. ImageImage
This last one I tried posting three times, only to find it disappear almost immediately each time. This was on the excellent Public Health Is Your Health Too page (follow!), run by @EpiRNActivist. In addition to the text, one of @MicahPollak's superb graphs was attached. Image
Read 7 tweets
29 Dec 20
1/ So I found out this garbage meta-analysis is apparently being shared all over the place. I decided to take a look at the studies they cited as evidence that asymptomatic and presymptomatic spread are marginal. What I found was shocking to say the least.
2/ They only included four studies that analyzed asymptomatic or presymptomatic transmission. One of the four studies was based on 8 cases and their 23 contacts. Four cases were presymptomatic and four asymptomatic. One of their 23 contacts was infected.
3/ The one case of transmission was from one of the four presymptomatic cases. They did not analyze any cases of symptomatic transmission. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Read 22 tweets
13 Nov 20
1/ Thanks to help from @Poppendieck & @CorsIAQ, I've used my @AranetIoT CO2 meter to estimate the # of air changes per hour (ACH) in my classroom. CO2 builds up when students are in a room & falls when they leave. Description & graphs below. #covidco2 @jljcolorado @ShellyMBoulder
2/ If you record the CO2 level each minute after the room empties, plug those measurements into the formula pictured below, and graph the resulting values as a function of time (designated in hours), the slope of a linear best-fit line reveals the ACH. @MarcelHarmon1 @CathNoakes
3/ So the rate of change of the CO2 level functions as a proxy measurement for ventilation. I trust if you’ve made it this far, you are aware of the vital importance of ventilation in preventing aerosol-spread pathogens like SARS-CoV-2. @akm5376 @jksmith34 @stephensbrent
Read 16 tweets
7 Nov 20
1/ I went to the eye doctor for a glaucoma checkup earlier this week & took my CO2 monitor with me to see how good the ventilation was there. It's a medical office & a new building (~3 years old), so I expected excellent ventilation. The ventilation was not excellent. #covidco2
2/ Instead, I was appalled to see the CO2 jump from ~500 ppm in my car to 1600+ immediately upon entering the building, which was actually quite empty apart from workers. I only saw one other patient the entire time I was there.
When I went back to an exam room for testing, the CO2 levels got even worse, nearing 2000 ppm. Here's the full day's CO2 levels, including the levels from my HS/MS classroom throughout the school day for comparison. @jljcolorado @CorsIAQ @ShellyMBoulder @jksmith34 @Poppendieck
Read 7 tweets
11 Oct 20
Pictured throughout thread are CO2 readings from my classroom Aranet4 CO2 meter. I have two 90-min classes (8:00-9:30, 9:40-11:10) & one 25-min homework/reading period (11:20-11:45) before lunch/prep from 11:50-1:15 & one 95-min class after (1:25-3:00). #covidco2 1/7
Maximum readings:

10-1: ~1200
10-2: ~1200
10-5: ~1200
10-6: 1447
10-7: 1345
10-8: 1446
10-9: 1448

Like ~80% of the rooms in my school, mine has no windows, but I'm lucky to have two doors, one opening to the hallway and one to our science lab. #covidco2 2/7
When I can keep both doors open, CO2 usually stays btwn 1000-1200, depending on the size of my class, which varies from 11 to 26.

I have 11 HS students in my AP Physics class & 16-26 6th-graders in my other 5 classes. My room volume is 215 m^3, & area 78.3 m^2. #covidco2 3/7
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!