Our concerns include:
📲 Exclusion & discrimination — Not everyone has vaccine access & these “passports” could further divide nations
📲 Privacy & security — Any system would collect personal info, risking privacy & increasing potential for surveillance, profiling & breaches
Our recommendations for decision-makers include:
✅ Do what is effective, not what is trending: Prioritize people and their needs, not a technical tool, and optimize for solutions that are less intrusive and that don’t hinder rollout of COVID-19 vaccines.
✅ Prioritize data protection: Minimize data collection and retention, meet and surpass legal requirements, and follow privacy-by-design principles to ensure robust respect for human rights.
✅ Be transparent in design and implementation: Use open-source tools, be aware of uncertainties, consult civil society, audit potential new tools with care, and communicate clearly with the public.
✅ Be equitable and inclusive: Access to any digital vaccine certificate should be free of charge, accessible, and paired with easily accessible paper-based forms as an interchangeable alternative. All approved vaccines should hold the same value.
✅ Focus: Digital vaccine certificates must not be treated as a vehicle for accelerating digital transformation more broadly.
✅ Prevent abuse now and in the future: Include strict data retention periods in public policy. Governments & companies must refrain from capitalizing on COVID-19 vaccination efforts to expand surveillance, silence dissent, or restrict freedom of expression, assembly & movement.
✅ Don’t create division: Systems that make digital vaccine certificates a requirement will divide and exclude.
“Governments must design and implement systems that put people first, supporting vaccine rollouts rather than contributing to a world where people are split between haves and havenots,” says @veroluiza.
Yesterday, the Ugandan Communication Commission ordered ISPs to:
- block social media platforms, including Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, Instagram, and Playstore Apps
- block over 100 VPNs (circumvention tools), making it impossible to avoid the censorship accessnow.org/uganda-interne…
The government has effectively cut off millions of people off from each other and the world.
Tech companies made the right call to stop hosting Parler after it refused to combat calls to violence. Action was needed, even though it was late and reactionary.
It’s also not that simple. THREAD 🧵
We should take platform shutdowns seriously.
What happened with Parler points to several larger issues that are not completely about Parler. Here are 5 we want to break down 👇
1) It highlights that Big Tech companies like Apple, Google, and Amazon hold too much power over the internet ecosystem.
2) There’s little to no transparency from these companies on how decisions like this are made.
1/ While our communities are focused on staying safe, as of now, @PIRegistry is still holding @ICANN to the March 20 deadline to decide on whether control of .ORG will transition from @internetsociety to private equity firm @ethos_capital.
2/ The #dotorg transition would add risk to crucial channels of trusted information in a precarious time.
3/ Given the current global crisis around #COVID19, and what is at stake for all who depend on .ORG — including civil society and many healthcare providers around the world — to reach people in urgent need of assistance, PIR should immediately extend the deadline.