Very well written opinion piece on the imagined war on meat. There's no such thing (yet). Just some scientists pointing out it has a really high carbon footprint and requires a lot of (fertile) land.
Once again reality has a strong liberal bias.
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Once again reality has a strong liberal bias.
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Of course there is also all the myths about meat eating being healthier (although most actual health experts say the opposite).
And what about animal suffering you ask? I predict that in 30 years we'll be just as ashamed about the bio industry as we are now about genocides.
And what about animal suffering you ask? I predict that in 30 years we'll be just as ashamed about the bio industry as we are now about genocides.
Which brings out the techno-optimist in me. (Apparently that is a bad thing, but I don't think so.)
I think plant-based alternatives will continue to get tastier to the point where you like them more.
Together with cultured meat they will replace traditional meat I think.
I think plant-based alternatives will continue to get tastier to the point where you like them more.
Together with cultured meat they will replace traditional meat I think.
I'm wondering what this will mean for the culture wars.
Will we see Tucker Carlson and other nutjobs personally slaughtering animals because real men only like meat that has suffered?
Or will they tow the company line of their cultured meat sponsors?
Exciting times!
Will we see Tucker Carlson and other nutjobs personally slaughtering animals because real men only like meat that has suffered?
Or will they tow the company line of their cultured meat sponsors?
Exciting times!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
