tl;dr: the worst of 🇪🇺's supply woes are behind it now...
1/11
22-29 January was really the low point
22 Jan: AZ scaled back its delivery forecast to the EU for Q1 from 100m to 31m
29 Jan: von der Leyen caused all the controversy by including reference to Art 16 NI Protocol in the transparency mechanism
2/11
But that transparency mechanism was when it all began to turn. For it allowed the EU to explain what vaccines were going where - and also highlight how much of UK's early vaccine success was based on exports from the EU
3/11
It also stemmed the tide of more exports of vaccines to other parts of the world that *themselves* also had production capacity (UK, US), while keeping exports flowing to places that didn't
To date only 1 250k shipment has actually been turned back by the mechanism
4/11
Behind the scenes Thierry Breton and governments of numerous EU Member States (notably Germany and Spain) were sorting out EU-only supply chains for BioNTech and J&J, while headaches with AZ persisted
5/11
Also Pfizer/BioNTech - with the most integrated EU-UK supply chain - was spared completely... because it had been delivering to schedule
There were only 2 public funders of BioNTech in the early phase: the EIB and the German Government
6/11
The decision from September 2020(!) - when BioNTech used the German government investment to purchase the Marburg plant from Novartis - is the single biggest reason why the EU supply is so strong
7/11
BioNTech might be a comparatively expensive vaccine, but its production has been rock solid and scaleable, it remains the most effective vaccine, and to date seems to have had the least problems of side effects
And the EU has *huge* supply of it coming on stream
8/11
Sure, the EU could have been *faster* in the first stage of the pandemic - it did not get the earliest orders. With hindsight the EMA could possibly have approved BioNTech and AZ a little faster. And the EU should perhaps have ensured more EU-only supply chains sooner.
9/11
But as it stands now, EU Member States' vaccines are motoring ahead, driven forward by 250m BioNTech doses due this quarter, and with mRNA vaccines assured into Q3/Q4 and beyond. The EU can afford to plan without AZ.
10/11
Was all of this perfect? No.
But it was not the catastrophe many claimed. The EU's bet on BioNTech paid off. Its vaccine supply is solid, and it's not nervously waiting on the approval of other vaccines to come. It all could be a lot worse!
11/11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The critique from plenty of people in 🇪🇺 and 🇬🇧 has been 🇪🇺 got its vaccines strategy *wrong*
So if it were wrong, what should it have done better?
First BioNTech/Pfizer orders and approval
🇬🇧 approved 3 weeks before 🇪🇺, and received a solid early order (shipped from Puurs 🇧🇪)
🇬🇧 signed contract with Pfizer/BioNTech 4 months before 🇪🇺, but EIB and 🇩🇪 provided funding, 🇬🇧 govt did not
BioNTech has also stated that more public funding would have not helped it scale up faster
Also looking forward, with Marburg 🇩🇪, Frankfurt 🇩🇪 due on stream in a couple of months, and lipids from Hanau 🇩🇪 (Evonik) to complete the 🇪🇺-based supply chain, this looks solid now
On 28 February this NY Times piece by @SharonLNYT:
"The initial 3.9 million [J&J] doses were manufactured at its factory in the Netherlands; officials have said the rest of the doses were expected to come from its Baltimore plant." (that's Emergent)
So now the European Commission *is* taking AstraZeneca to court, I presume all the EU-sceptics who said the Commission will never dare will eat their words?
"Have you seen that Express is rebroadcasting one of your Euronews interviews?" @RobHarrison_EU asked me earlier
"What?" I replied
And so they are... here I am saying there is "fear in Brussels at the moment" in a clip on the Daily Express site
A 🧵 on fake news
The story is titled "Brussels chaos: UK tells EU it's all set for WTO rules as Australia deal gives huge boost" and is dated yesterday, Saturday 24 April
I have never even spoken to Euronews about the EU-Australia trade deal
Listening to BBC Radio 4 Briefing Room with @DAaronovitch explaining the German Grüne and why Baerbock is Chancellor candidate. It interviews @fazbub and @chantalS_T. It has some interesting background, but I'm not sure it really explains what's going on
It makes the case the rise of the Grüne was a sort of counterweight to the rise of the AfD in 2015-2017. That's not really right I think. The programme doesn't really explain the headaches of other parties that help the Grüne.
Also I am not sure you can understand what the Grüne could do without asking where they'd manage to get agreement with coalition partners.
@SophiaBesch talking on foreign policy at the end of the programme is the clearest of the speakers.