*Perhaps* approved earlier
*Perhaps* ordered earlier, so as to have secured more doses in Q1 - but before Puurs upgrade total doses were limited overall
What about AstraZeneca?
π¬π§ approved 4 weeks ahead of πͺπΊ, but due to the thin data available there was perhaps good reason for caution here. And what has happened since has borne this out
Extent of AZ having an exclusive supply arrangement with π¬π§ hasn't been definitively answered, but given π¬π§ has AZ production of 6m AZ doses/month, even were that not the case, production from π¬π§ would not have made up the shortfall
The crux: AZ projected 100m doses for Q1 to πͺπΊ and delivered 31m. Had that not been the case, vaccine roll out in πͺπΊ would have been further along
The mystery of the Halix plant contributes to this - we still don't know what's up there
What could πͺπΊ have done to improve this in 2021 until now? Pretty much nothing, as the news of the shortfall came too late (22 Jan)
What about Moderna?
πͺπΊ has a rather small order of it (as does π¬π§ for that matter) and it has not been central to roll out for either
Had πͺπΊ been alert to this danger sooner - in autumn rather than in early 2021 - it's possible there might be a little more J&J on stream already now
So - in summary - even *if* πͺπΊ had done pretty much everything in its control right, it would have had a little more Pfizer/BioNTech sooner (up to 20m doses) and perhaps some more J&J (no more than 10m)
Given an EU adult population of 330m or so, that'd still mean the vaccination supply in πͺπΊ would not have been significantly better than it is now
There is also the other aspect of a counter-factual: if πͺπΊ had not handled procurement jointly, vaccine supply would vary wildly between Member States, leaving poorer states and those without their own supply suffering. Doing this jointly made sense
So, to conclude:
Was this done perfectly? NO
Were there errors? YES
How much better would vaccine supply be in EU be in a best-case? A LITTLE
Let's keep the doomsday takes in perspective please!
/ends
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
tl;dr: the worst of πͺπΊ's supply woes are behind it now...
1/11
22-29 January was really the low point
22 Jan: AZ scaled back its delivery forecast to the EU for Q1 from 100m to 31m
29 Jan: von der Leyen caused all the controversy by including reference to Art 16 NI Protocol in the transparency mechanism
2/11
But that transparency mechanism was when it all began to turn. For it allowed the EU to explain what vaccines were going where - and also highlight how much of UK's early vaccine success was based on exports from the EU
On 28 February this NY Times piece by @SharonLNYT:
"The initial 3.9 million [J&J] doses were manufactured at its factory in the Netherlands; officials have said the rest of the doses were expected to come from its Baltimore plant." (that's Emergent)
So now the European Commission *is* taking AstraZeneca to court, I presume all the EU-sceptics who said the Commission will never dare will eat their words?
"Have you seen that Express is rebroadcasting one of your Euronews interviews?" @RobHarrison_EU asked me earlier
"What?" I replied
And so they are... here I am saying there is "fear in Brussels at the moment" in a clip on the Daily Express site
A 𧡠on fake news
The story is titled "Brussels chaos: UK tells EU it's all set for WTO rules as Australia deal gives huge boost" and is dated yesterday, Saturday 24 April
I have never even spoken to Euronews about the EU-Australia trade deal
Listening to BBC Radio 4 Briefing Room with @DAaronovitch explaining the German GrΓΌne and why Baerbock is Chancellor candidate. It interviews @fazbub and @chantalS_T. It has some interesting background, but I'm not sure it really explains what's going on
It makes the case the rise of the GrΓΌne was a sort of counterweight to the rise of the AfD in 2015-2017. That's not really right I think. The programme doesn't really explain the headaches of other parties that help the GrΓΌne.
Also I am not sure you can understand what the GrΓΌne could do without asking where they'd manage to get agreement with coalition partners.
@SophiaBesch talking on foreign policy at the end of the programme is the clearest of the speakers.