#Lidar is an operational technology for #forestinventory. Single-photon lidar (#SPL) may provide an acquisition advantage for large areas. How does #SPL perform in an area-based #forest inventory? Some things we have learned (i.e. a thread)!

#OpenAccess: bit.ly/37GTeZG
2/ We used #SPL and 269 field plots to generate an area-based operational #forestinventory over a 15000 ha study area of temperate mixedwood forest representing a complex assemblage of tree species, forest structures, and management histories. bit.ly/37GTeZG
3/ We validated our #forestinventory estimates at the stand-level using independent field measured data. Why? Because the stand is the fundamental spatial unit for forest management and planning, and the unit at which decisions are made. #CFSEFI bit.ly/37GTeZG
4/ We predicted a suite of #forestinventory attributes and assessed model performance overall and by forest type. bit.ly/37GTeZG
5/ Accuracy and bias varied by forest type. Stand-level validation was important for assessing model performance in different stand conditions. Overall, plot-level results (OOB) overestimated model error and underestimated bias relative to the stand-level validation results.
6/ #Forestinventory attributes such as volume and basal area were most challenging in managed pine stands and red pine plantations, which have very different stand structures. bit.ly/37GTeZG
7/ Results were on par with area-based outcomes achieved using linear-mode #lidar in this same study area, as well as with results reported in other studies using SPL data (in boreal forests): bit.ly/3u0dhLE and bit.ly/2PyHpPy.
8/ For large FMAs, the ability to acquire #lidar data from a single instrument with a consistent specification can be critical for operational implementation. From a model performance perspective, SPL data provided accurate #forestinventory attribute estimates with minimal bias.
9/ Collaborators: Dr. Margaret Penner and Murray Woods. Partners: @CIF_IFC, @cwfc_ccfb & @PRF_CFS. Data provided by @ONresources. Funding provided by the Ontario Forestry Future's Trust.
#OpenAccess: bit.ly/37GTeZG
10/ To learn more about our project "Exploring the innovation potential of single photon lidar for Ontario's eFRI" (including recorded webinar): bit.ly/32ReN72 and also bit.ly/3e134cE
11/ It is worth noting that although #SPL offers an advantage for #lidar data acquisition over large areas because of the high altitude used for acquisition (~3800 m agl and as documented bit.ly/3u0dhLE and bit.ly/2PyHpPy), low clouds/smoke can be problematic.
12/ Finally, to access the SPL and field plot data used in our research, as well as the predicted EFI attribute layers, visit the PRF remote sensing supersite [bit.ly/3vqaADD] and use search terms PRF and SPL. #PRFSS #CFSEFI
#OpenAccess: bit.ly/37GTeZG

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Joanne C. White

Dr. Joanne C. White Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Joanne_C_White

6 Jan 20
An increasingly common question: “We generated an enhanced forest inventory with #lidar data and ground plots for one of our management units. Can we use the same models for our other management areas?” #CFSEFI #forestinventory
A great question and one that is top of mind for many of us who generate and use #forestinventory data. So what does the #science tell us about the transferability of area-based models? #CFSEFI
Fekety et al. 2015: "Mapping response variables at the landscape level demonstrates that the relationship between field data and LiDAR metrics holds true even though the data were collected in different years."

Read: dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!