Share this page!

Maybe Scrolly?
Lazarus Long Profile picture
Twitter logo
28 Apr, 9 tweets, 5 min read
Pandata Scientific Advisory Board - How it started on October 6, 2020!

Jay Bhattacharya!
Sunetra Gupta!
Martin Kulldorff!
Michael Levitt!

URL to board (now defunct):
pandata.org/scientific-adv…

Press Release:
web.archive.org/web/2021012620… Image
Then, 3 became 8! Bonus -Scott Atlas joined on January 1, 2021! What a way to start the new year!



Backed up (no games now, Abir...)
Image
January 14th! 9 members?! What!?

Would you believe that Karol Sikora joined?! So excited to be there with a Nobel winner!

Is his buddy, Carl Heneghan next!?

web.archive.org/web/2021011413… Image
So close to getting Heneghan! January 26th, the one and only most reputable Scott Jensen!

Kulldorff must be so proud to have Jensen right next to him. It's not like he works for the CDC on vaccines.

Or Jensen is antivax...
minnesotareformer.com/2020/02/09/ant…

web.archive.org/web/2021012605… Image
Uh oh, trouble in paradise on the same day! Pandata gets called out for being anti-vax.



Backup:


Interesting to note that stance is exactly Jensen's stance.

So, Karol Sikora resigns:
.
By February 25th, Paul Peterson of the Hoover Institute has joined! Yes! Two Hoovers with Scott Atlas!

web.archive.org/web/2021022504… Image
April 19th, 2021. A sad day for all of us who really, really appreciate Pandata19's excellent data analysis.

Michael Levitt leaved it. Sorry - bad pun.

Levitt left. BECAUSE Pandata is anti-vax.


Backup.
April 20th, 2021.

Due to several resignations because Pandata19 is against vaccines, "(t)he role of the Scientific Advisory Board will be subsumed into the organisation."

Misspelling the last word of the existence of the Board.

web.archive.org/web/2021042823…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Lazarus Long

Lazarus Long Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LazarusLong13

Lazarus Long Profile picture
30 Apr
Always a great study when tweeted out by Dr. Noakes - let's dive in.

✅2 cases of transmission from bus drivers to passengers up to more than 9 feet/ 3 meters.
✅Genomic confirmation
✅Airflow traced - please see Dr. Noakes original thread for commentary on the method used. Image
Limitations:
📌Facemask compliance unsure
📌Fomite possible. Not likely
📌Community transmission possible - but not likely Image
Two trips and two separate van drivers involved.

Both trips - windows closed, ventilation NOT on recirculate, heaters on medium fan.

First trip - 4 patients on 2-hour trips to and from the hospital on December 2, 2020. Driver tested +positive on December 3, 2020.

Van below. Image
Read 12 tweets
Lazarus Long Profile picture
29 Apr
This. This is why I push ever harder on #CoVidIsAirborne, and against Conly and Heneghan.

If we let impossible standards to be ramrodded down our throat by a @WHO who has hired an antimasker to run an airborne transmission, then we are lost.
Heneghan is clearly antimask. The corollary to that is to think that CoVid is NOT airborne.

Conly is clearly conflicted without EVER declaring that he's getting paid to push handwashing. Image
That little nugget is not in any of the competing interest statements on any of the studies he is working with Heneghan on.

He also didn't list it in the debate.

Read 4 tweets
Lazarus Long Profile picture
29 Apr
The man getting paid by @WHO leading the transmission reviews of CoVid, folks.

Tweeting out an article that argues that Kulldorff, Heneghan, and Jefferson are being censored because their views are not allowed to course freely on Twitter or Facebook.
Such silliness. These are private companies.

We all agree to their terms and conditions when we sign up.

BTW - here's his article - you'll noticed it's published?

Literally, one google away.
spectator.co.uk/article/do-mas…
It's not like there aren't a million other places like Parler or AIER for Heneghan to voice his opinion.

Here's Paul Alexander, The Not Nice Canadian, who urged herd immunity upon us through Trump, citing Heneghan's study in a typical antimasker piece.

aier.org/article/maskin…
Read 7 tweets
Lazarus Long Profile picture
29 Apr
The logic that aerosols produced by a nebullizer aren't indicative of aerosol transmission was also used by Dr. Conly, the @WHO's lead on the transmission committee during the discussion of #CovidIsAirborne.



The study being referenced is a preprint, but
after reviewing it, I see no obvious gotchas on why it won't go forward.

Title "Aerosol Exposure of Cynomolgus Macaques to SARS-CoV-2 Results in More Severe Pathology than Existing Models"

While ferrets are typically the gold standard for respiratory studies, macaques are good
because their lungs and respiratory system are up and down, as opposed to horizontal like a ferret's.

Relevant section - using a Collison Nebulizer Image
Read 6 tweets
Lazarus Long Profile picture
29 Apr
Dr. Conly getting to be more famous for his anti-masker stance than all of his good work in the past?

Is he heading down the sad road of Michael Levitt?

I hope not.

But - even Dubai is calling him out.

gulfnews.com/special-report…
Maybe calling him out is not the right phrase. "Taking him to the woodshed" is a phrase that's more applicable.

Here Conly is trotting out the classic antimasker arguments: acne, CO2, etc. And the article calls him out for being absurd.

Which it is - I've pointed these Image
out personally.


The article actually started to address that question as well - but is missing that the question and answer.

In the process of reaching out to them to get it corrected and gathering resources for them, I discovered THE Paul Alexander of
Read 5 tweets
Lazarus Long Profile picture
29 Apr
Must read study on the 6 feet rule and the 5 microns - some eye candy to get you to read it.

(Come for the candy, stay for the healthy veggies).

Nodes in peach are 3 foot rule
Nodes in blue are 6 feet.
Nodes in red are variable.
Arrows show older cited in newer. Image
Full explanation. Image
Dark purple outline - mention of 5 micron cut-off
Purple - airborne = particles that remain suspended in the air.
Light Green - "particles that can be inhaled"
Dark Green - "particles that are infectious".
A dotted line indicates the older source is cited in order to disagree. Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @LazarusLong13 has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @LazarusLong13!

Read all threads by @LazarusLong13